RESULTS OF EXPERIMENTS ON AUTOMATED MATCHING OF NETWORKS AT DIFFERENT SCALES

Many geographical databases of the same area are produced and maintained. In order to remove inconsistencies between those databases, and in order to facilitate the updating process, a close integration is required. This paper reports the results of experiments of data matching between the networks of two IGN databases at different scales (road, electric, hydrographical, railway and hiking routes networks). We illustrate the main results of these experiments through four different aspects. The first aspect is the identification of data that can not be matched because they only appear in one database. Some of these differences between the contents of the databases are clearly explained by the specifications: they reflect the difference between points of views. Some other differences are just discovered in the data: they reflect the different sources used to build databases and inconsistencies due to errors. The second aspect is the analysis of differences and inconsistencies between databases when corresponding objects are identified. In particular, we identified differences between attribute values, geometric descriptions, but also topological relationships between objects. A third studied aspect is the degree of automation of the matching process. We managed to automatically match from 90% to 100% of objects in networks, depending of the complexity of the networks. Finally, the fourth considered aspect concern the interactive checking of results. We identified ergonomic difficulty to visualize data and results of matching. We thus propose some solutions to overcome these difficulties.

[1]  Udo W. Lipeck,et al.  Matching cartographic objects in spatial databases , 2004 .

[2]  T. Kilpeläinen Maintenance of Multiple Representation Databases for Topographic Data , 2000 .

[3]  M. Egenhofer Evaluating Inconsistencies Among Multiple Representations , 2000 .

[4]  Volker Walter,et al.  Matching spatial data sets: a statistical approach , 1999, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[5]  Liqiu Meng,et al.  A generic matching algorithm for line networks of different resolutions , 2005 .

[6]  Stefano Spaccapietra,et al.  Database Integration: the Key to Data Interoperability , 2022 .

[7]  Jean-Daniel Zucker,et al.  Consistency Assessment Between Multiple Representations of Geographical Databases: a Specification-Based Approach , 2004, SDH.

[8]  Max J. Egenhofer,et al.  Asessing Semnatic Similarities among Geospatial Feature Class Definitions , 1999, INTEROP.

[9]  Monika Sester,et al.  Multiple representation and interoperability of spatial data , 2006 .

[10]  Monika Sester,et al.  Real-time integration and generalization of spatial data for mobile applications , 2002 .

[11]  David Sheeren Méthodologie d'évaluation de la cohérence inter-représentations pour l'intégration de bases de données spatiales. Une approche combinant l'utilisation de métadonnées et l'apprentissage automatique. , 2005 .

[12]  J. Paiva Topological Equivalence and Similarity in Multi-Representation Geographic Databases , 1998 .

[13]  Stefano Spaccapietra,et al.  Modelling and Manipulating Multiple Representations of Spatial Data , 2002 .

[14]  Martien Molenaar,et al.  Ontology-Based Geographic Data Set Integration , 1999, Spatio-Temporal Database Management.

[15]  Stefano Spaccapietra,et al.  On Spatial Database Integration , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[16]  Thomas Devogele,et al.  Processus d'intégration et d'appariement de Bases de Données Géographiques; Application à une base de données routières multi-échelles , 1997 .

[17]  Sébastien Mustière,et al.  Database Requirements for Generalisation and Multiple Representations , 2007 .

[18]  Anastasiya Sotnykova,et al.  DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF FEDERATION OF SPATIO-TEMPORAL DATABASES : METHODS AND TOOLS , .

[19]  Jan-Henrik Haunert Link based Conflation of Geographic Datasets , 2005 .