论文信息 - Difficulty with life and death: methodological issues and results from the utility scaling of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) Instrument - 字舞流文

Difficulty with life and death: methodological issues and results from the utility scaling of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) Instrument

G. Hawthorne | J. Richardson

[1] P. Dolan,et al. Valuing health states: a comparison of methods. , 1996, Journal of health economics.

[2] J. Richardson,et al. Cost utility analysis: what should be measured? , 1994, Social science & medicine.

[3] J. Richardson,et al. Social Evaluation of Health Care Versus Personal Evaluation of Health States: Evidence on the Validity of Four Health-state Scaling Instruments Using Norwegian and Australian Surveys , 1993, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[4] G. Torrance. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. , 1986, Journal of health economics.

[5] R. L. Keeney,et al. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[6] G. Hawthorne,et al. Negative Utility Scores and Evaluating the AQoL All Worst Health State , 2001 .

[7] J. Richardson,et al. Construction and Utility Scaling of the Assessment of Quality of Life ( AQoL ) Instrument , 2001 .

[8] G. Hawthorne,et al. The Australian Multi-attribute Utility (AMAU) construction and Initial Evaluation , 1996 .

[9] H. Sintonen,et al. A fifteen-dimensional measure of health-related quality of life (15D) and its applications , 1993 .

[10] Rachel M. Rosser,et al. A health index and output measure , 1993 .

[11] G. Torrance. Multi-attribute preference functions for a comprehensive health status classification system , 1992 .