Neither high-pass filtering nor mathematical differentiation of the EMG signals can considerably reduce cross-talk.

Using mathematical simulation of motor unit potentials (MUPs), detected by a point and rectangular plate electrode, we have shown that the muscle tissue does not act like a low-pass frequency filter on MUPs. Depending on the electrode type and its longitudinal position, the relative weight of the terminal phases (reflecting the excitation extinction) in MUPs and thus of high frequencies in the MUP power spectrum, increase with the MU depth. Therefore, high-pass filtering or differentiating signals detected neither monopolarly nor bipolarly could eliminate the cross-talk produced by high frequency components of MUPs from deep MUs. Such methods could be effective against the main components but not against the MUP leading edge and terminal phases. To reduce the cross-talk, position of the detecting electrodes should correspond to anatomy of muscles producing the cross-talk. Monopolar electrode should be located above the ends of the muscles. Cross-talk of the muscles located beyond the muscle of interest could be higher than that produced above the end-plate of deep muscles. On the contrary, under detection by a longitudinal bipolar electrode, the cross-talk is much smaller above the end-plate region or beyond deep muscles. The cross-talk is the greatest above the ends of the deep muscles.

[1]  T J Koh,et al.  Cross talk in surface electromyograms of human hamstring muscles , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[2]  Daniel W. Stashuk,et al.  Detection of motor unit action potentials with surface electrodes: influence of electrode size and spacing , 1992, Biological Cybernetics.

[3]  C. J. Luca Myoelectrical manifestations of localized muscular fatigue in humans. , 1984 .

[4]  C J De Luca,et al.  The relation between the myoelectric signal and physiological properties of constant-force isometric contractions. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  A H Lang,et al.  The time parameters of motor unit potentials recorded with multi-electrodes and the summation technique. , 1974, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  S. L. H. Notermans,et al.  Current practice of clinical electromyography , 1984 .

[7]  B. S. Sonde,et al.  Special Purpose Amplifiers , 1973 .

[8]  D F Stegeman,et al.  Muscle fiber action potential changes and surface EMG: A simulation study. , 1992, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[9]  Karin Roeleveld,et al.  Far-field potentials in surface EMG , 1995 .

[10]  D. Stegeman,et al.  Motor unit potential contribution to surface electromyography. , 1997, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[11]  E. Kaplan Muscles Alive. Their Functions Revealed by Electromyography. J. V. Basmajian. Baltimore, The Williams and Wilkins Co., 1962. $8.50 , 1962 .

[12]  Jiri Silny,et al.  Spatial Filtering of Noninvasive Multielectrode EMG: Part I-Introduction to Measuring Technique and Applications , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  R. Lemon,et al.  Selective facilitation of different hand muscles by single corticospinal neurones in the conscious monkey. , 1986, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  The effects of training through high‐frequency electrical stimulation on the physiological properties of single human thenar motor units , 1999, Muscle & nerve.

[15]  E Stålberg,et al.  On the volume conduction in human skeletal muscle: in situ measurements. , 1977, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  Z Xu,et al.  Digital filter design for peak detection of surface EMG. , 2000, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[17]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  A Note on the Noninvasive Estimation of Muscle Fiber Conduction Velocity , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  D. Stegeman,et al.  Finite limb dimensions and finite muscle length in a model for the generation of electromyographic signals. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  G Rau,et al.  Non-invasive detection of the single motor unit action potential by averaging the spatial potential distribution triggered on a spatially filtered motor unit action potential. , 1999, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[20]  M. Solomonow,et al.  Surface and wire EMG crosstalk in neighbouring muscles. , 1994, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[21]  E. Keshner,et al.  Neck muscle activation patterns in humans during isometric head stabilization , 1989, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  C. Håkansson Action potentials recorded intra- and extracellularly from the isolated frog muscle fibre in Ringer's solution and in air. , 1957, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[23]  J. Basmajian Muscles Alive—their functions revealed by electromyography , 1963 .

[24]  M. Grabiner,et al.  Evaluation of methods to minimize cross talk in surface electromyography. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  Physiology and Mathematics of Myoelectric Signals , 1979 .

[26]  M. Revel,et al.  Surface electrodes are not appropriate to record selective myoelectric activity of splenius capitis muscle in humans , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  G. E. Goslow,et al.  "Cross-talk" in electromyograms: contamination of EMGs recorded with bipolar fine-wire electrodes by volume conducted myoelectric activity from distant sources. , 1986, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[28]  P. Rosenfalck Intra- and extracellular potential fields of active nerve and muscle fibres. A physico-mathematical analysis of different models. , 1969, Acta physiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[29]  K. L. Boon,et al.  A study of the motor unit action potential by means of computer simulation , 1978, Biological Cybernetics.

[30]  L. Widen,et al.  Recent Advances in Clinical Neurophysiology , 1967 .

[31]  D Kosarov,et al.  The influence of the volume conduction on the shape of the action potentials recorded by various types of needle electrodes in normal human muscle. , 1975, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[32]  Catherine Disselhorst-Klug,et al.  Simulation analysis of the ability of different types of multi-electrodes to increase selectivity of detection and to reduce cross-talk. , 2003, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[33]  L.H. Lindstrom,et al.  Interpretation of myoelectric power spectra: A model and its applications , 1977, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[34]  C. D. De Luca,et al.  Surface myoelectric signal cross-talk among muscles of the leg. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[35]  C. Disselhorst-Klug,et al.  Principles of high-spatial-resolution surface EMG (HSR-EMG): single motor unit detection and application in the diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders. , 1997, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[36]  G V Dimitrov,et al.  Bipolar recording of potentials generated by excitable fibres in a volume conductor. , 1977, Agressologie: revue internationale de physio-biologie et de pharmacologie appliquees aux effets de l'agression.

[37]  Z C Lateva,et al.  Influence of the fiber length on the power spectra of single muscle fiber extracellular potentials. , 1991, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[38]  D W Stashuk,et al.  Motor unit number estimates based on the automated analysis of F‐responses , 1994, Muscle & nerve.

[39]  T. S. Miles,et al.  Cross-talk from other muscles can contaminate EMG signals in reflex studies of the human leg , 1990, Neuroscience Letters.

[40]  D Kosarov,et al.  Volume conduction of the potentials from separate motor units in human muscle. , 1972, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[41]  D. Graupe,et al.  Motor unit number estimation by spatial‐temporal summation of single motor unit potentials , 1997, Muscle & nerve.

[42]  R. L. Nó,et al.  A Study Of Nerve Physiology , 1947 .

[43]  Jiri Silny,et al.  Spatial Filtering of Noninvasive Multielectrode EMG: Part II-Filter Performance in Theory and Modeling , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[44]  G V Dimitrov,et al.  Effect of electrode dimensions on motor unit potentials. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[45]  D. Winter,et al.  Crosstalk in surface electromyography: Theoretical and practical estimates. , 1994, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[46]  T J Doherty,et al.  A method for the longitudinal study of human thenar motor units , 1994, Muscle & nerve.

[47]  Svend Erik Mathiassen,et al.  Electromyographic activity in the shoulder-neck region according to arm position and glenohumeral torque , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[48]  Morrenhof Jw,et al.  Cross-correlation and cross-talk in surface electromyography. , 1985 .

[49]  Use of the collision technique to improve the accuracy of motor unit number estimation , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[50]  Volume conduction of motor unit potentials from different human muscles to long distances. , 1982, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[51]  D. Antonelli,et al.  Surface versus intramuscular electrodes for electromyography of superficial and deep muscles. , 1981, Physical therapy.

[52]  P. Zipp,et al.  Effect of electrode geometry on the selectivity of myoelectric recordings with surface electrodes , 1982, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[53]  S. Andreassen,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Individual Motor Unit Potentials: A Proposition for Standardized Terminology and Criteria for Measurement , 1986, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[54]  Electromyographic cross‐talk within a compartmentalized muscle of the cat. , 1989, The Journal of physiology.

[55]  Isak Gath,et al.  Techniques for Improving the Selectivity of Electromyographic Recordings , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[56]  N. Dimitrova,et al.  Model of the extracellular potential field of a single striated muscle fibre. , 1974, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[57]  Vladimir Medved,et al.  Standards for Reporting EMG Data , 2000, Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology.

[58]  G V Dimitrov,et al.  Fundamentals of power spectra of extracellular potentials produced by a skeletal muscle fibre of finite length. Part I: Effect of fibre anatomy. , 1998, Medical engineering & physics.

[59]  N. Dimitrova,et al.  Precise and fast calculation of the motor unit potentials detected by a point and rectangular plate electrode. , 1998, Medical engineering & physics.

[60]  G V Dimitrov,et al.  Extracellular potential field of a single striated muscle fibre immersed in anisotropic volume conductor. , 1974, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[61]  J F Yang,et al.  Methods for estimating the number of motor units in human muscles , 1990, Annals of neurology.

[62]  Extracellular potential field generated by activated short muscle fibres. , 1978, Agressologie: revue internationale de physio-biologie et de pharmacologie appliquees aux effets de l'agression.

[63]  D. Denny-Brown,et al.  Interpretation of the electromyogram. , 1949, Archives of neurology and psychiatry.

[64]  C. Elwin,et al.  Stimulation of Gastric Acid Secretion by Irrigation of the Antrum with Some Aliphatic Alcohols1 , 1969 .

[65]  Steen Andreassen,et al.  Recording from a Single Motor Unit During Strong Effort , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.