Emergence of species in evolutionary “simulated annealing”

Which factors govern the evolution of mutation rates and emergence of species? Here, we address this question by using a first principles model of life where population dynamics of asexual organisms is coupled to molecular properties and interactions of proteins encoded in their genomes. Simulating evolution of populations, we found that fitness increases in punctuated steps via epistatic events, leading to formation of stable and functionally interacting proteins. At low mutation rates, species form populations of organisms tightly localized in sequence space, whereas at higher mutation rates, species are lost without an apparent loss of fitness. However, when mutation rate was a selectable trait, the population initially maintained high mutation rate until a high fitness level was reached, after which organisms with low mutation rates are gradually selected, with the population eventually reaching mutation rates comparable with those of modern DNA-based organisms. This study shows that the fitness landscape of a biophysically realistic system is extremely complex, with huge number of local peaks rendering adaptation dynamics to be a glass-like process. On a more practical level, our results provide a rationale to experimental observations of the effect of mutation rate on fitness of populations of asexual organisms.

[1]  Eugene I. Shakhnovich,et al.  Enumeration of all compact conformations of copolymers with random sequence of links , 1990 .

[2]  I. Matic,et al.  Evolution of mutation rates in bacteria , 2006, Molecular microbiology.

[3]  Eugene I. Shakhnovich,et al.  Protein stability imposes limits on organism complexity and speed of molecular evolution , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  R. Lenski,et al.  Evolution of high mutation rates in experimental populations of E. coli , 1997, Nature.

[5]  R A Goldstein,et al.  The distribution of structures in evolving protein populations. , 2000, Biopolymers.

[6]  J. Drake,et al.  Mutation rates among RNA viruses. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  I. Ispolatov,et al.  Propagation of large concentration changes in reversible protein-binding networks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  S. Elena,et al.  Exponential increases of RNA virus fitness during large population transmissions. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  C. Cameron,et al.  RNA virus error catastrophe: Direct molecular test by using ribavirin , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Sergei Maslov,et al.  Constraints imposed by non-functional protein–protein interactions on gene expression and proteome size , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[12]  T. Baker,et al.  Specificity versus stability in computational protein design. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  T. Johnson,et al.  The evolution of mutation rates: separating causes from consequences , 2000, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[14]  Eugene I. Shakhnovich,et al.  A First-Principles Model of Early Evolution: Emergence of Gene Families, Species, and Preferred Protein Folds , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[15]  M. Huynen,et al.  Neutral evolution of mutational robustness. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  A. E. Hirsh,et al.  Evolutionary Rate in the Protein Interaction Network , 2002, Science.

[17]  H. A. Orr,et al.  The rate of adaptation in asexuals. , 2000, Genetics.

[18]  F. Taddei,et al.  Role of mutator alleles in adaptive evolution , 1997, Nature.

[19]  F. Taddei,et al.  Highly variable mutation rates in commensal and pathogenic Escherichia coli. , 1997, Science.

[20]  Eugene I Shakhnovich,et al.  Understanding protein evolution: from protein physics to Darwinian selection. , 2008, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[21]  A. R. Fresht Structure and Mechanism in Protein Science: A Guide to Enzyme Catalysis and Protein Folding , 1999 .

[22]  Claus O. Wilke,et al.  Adaptive evolution on neutral networks , 2001, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[23]  K. de Queiroz,et al.  Species concepts and species delimitation. , 2007, Systematic biology.

[24]  R. Lenski,et al.  Microbial genetics: Evolution experiments with microorganisms: the dynamics and genetic bases of adaptation , 2003, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[25]  M. Eigen,et al.  Molecular quasi-species. , 1988 .

[26]  M. Huynen,et al.  Smoothness within ruggedness: the role of neutrality in adaptation. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  C. Wilke,et al.  Genealogical process on a correlated fitness landscape. , 2002, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[28]  E. Mayr Systematics and the Origin of Species , 1942 .

[29]  P. Sniegowski,et al.  Fitness evolution and the rise of mutator alleles in experimental Escherichia coli populations. , 2002, Genetics.

[30]  Christoph Adami,et al.  Selection for mutational robustness in finite populations. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[31]  B. Godelle,et al.  The Evolution of Mutation Rate in Finite Asexual Populations , 2006, Genetics.

[32]  A. Perelson,et al.  Complete genetic linkage can subvert natural selection , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  L. Loeb,et al.  Viral error catastrophe by mutagenic nucleosides. , 2004, Annual review of microbiology.

[34]  M. Hasegawa,et al.  Entropy increase of amino acid sequence in protein , 1974, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[35]  R. Lenski,et al.  Punctuated Evolution Caused by Selection of Rare Beneficial Mutations , 1996, Science.

[36]  J. Krug,et al.  Adaptation in simple and complex fitness landscapes , 2005, q-bio/0508008.

[37]  David J. Earl,et al.  Evolvability is a selectable trait. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  P. Schuster,et al.  IR-98-039 / April Continuity in Evolution : On the Nature of Transitions , 1998 .

[39]  M. Eigen Selforganization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules , 1971, Naturwissenschaften.

[40]  J. Drake,et al.  The Distribution of Rates of Spontaneous Mutation over Viruses, Prokaryotes, and Eukaryotes , 1999, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[41]  P. Hogeweg,et al.  Phenotypic error threshold; additivity and epistasis in RNA evolution , 2005, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[42]  Richard A Goldstein,et al.  Why are proteins so robust to site mutations? , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.