Active Comparison as a Means of Promoting the Development of Abstract Conditional Knowledge and Appropriate Choice of Diagrams in Math Word Problem Solving

This study sought to address the problem of novices not being able to select the appropriate diagrams to suit given tasks. It investigated the usefulness of providing teaching sessions that involved active comparison of diagrams and review of lessons learnt following problem solving. Fifty-eight 8th grade participants were assigned to one of two instruction conditions. In both, traditional math classes were provided in which diagrams were used to explain how to solve math word problems. However, participants in the experimental group were additionally provided with sessions that required them to actively compare diagrams used, and consider and articulate the lessons they learnt from the problem solving exercises. The results showed that participants in the experimental condition subsequently constructed more appropriate diagrams in solving math word problems. In an assessment of conditional knowledge, these participants also provided more abstract and detailed descriptions about the uses of diagrams in problem solving.

[1]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987 .

[2]  Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al.  A Cognitive Task Analysis of Using Pictures To Support Pre-Algebraic Reasoning , 2002 .

[3]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes In The Age Of The Machine , 1993 .

[4]  Sean M. Hurley,et al.  Evidence for abstract, schematic knowledge of three spatial diagram representations , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[5]  Peter C.-H. Cheng,et al.  Why Diagrams Are (Sometimes) Six Times Easier than Words: Benefits beyond Locational Indexing , 2004, Diagrams.

[6]  Yuri Uesaka,et al.  What kinds of perceptions and daily learning behaviors promote students' use of diagrams in mathematics problem solving? , 2007 .

[7]  Richard Cox Analytical reasoning with multiple external representations , 1996 .

[8]  R. Cox Representation construction, externalised cognition and individual differences , 1999 .

[9]  L. Verschaffel,et al.  Do realistic contexts and graphical representations always have a beneficial impact on students' performance? Negative evidence from a study on modelling non-linear geometry problems , 2003 .

[10]  Richard Cox,et al.  The Effect of Knowledge-of-External-Representations upon Performance and Representational Choice in a Database Query Task , 2004, Diagrams.

[11]  Shmuel Ellis,et al.  After-event reviews: drawing lessons from successful and failed experience. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  Hermann G. Ebner,et al.  Improving cross-content transfer in text processing by means of active graphical representation , 2003 .

[13]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. , 1989 .

[14]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Schema induction and analogical transfer , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  John D. Bransford,et al.  New approaches to instruction: because wisdom can't be told , 1989 .

[16]  Peter C.-H. Cheng,et al.  Electrifying diagrams for learning: principles for complex representational systems , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[17]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .