Phase II study of estramustine and vinorelbine in hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma patients.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antitumor activity of vinorelbine and oral estramustine phosphate in patients with metastatic, hormone-refractory prostate cancer. We evaluated the activity of this association using the following schedule: estramustine phosphate 600 mg/m2/day orally days 1-42 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m1 days 1, 8, 22, 29 cycles repeated every 56 days. Twenty-five patients were included in the study, 24 being evaluable for response and 25 for toxicity. Out of 5 patients with measurable disease, none had an objective response. Of the 24 assessable patients with bone metastases, 9 patients had a > or = 65% decline in pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, stable disease was observed in 10 and 5 patients progressed. Toxicities were minimal. Anemia was observed in 5 patients, alopecia in 4 and nausea and vomiting was observed in 6 patients. Anorexia and weight loss of more than 10% were observed in 2 patients. This combination is active and well tolerated in hormone-resistant prostate cancer. These results support the therapeutic strategy of combining agents that impair microtubule function.

[1]  S. Litwin,et al.  Phase II trial of 96-hour paclitaxel plus oral estramustine phosphate in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  W. Kreis,et al.  Symptomatic improvement associated with combined estramustine and vinblastine chemotherapy for metastatic prostate cancer. , 1996, American journal of clinical oncology.

[3]  M. R. Cooper,et al.  Antitumor activity of suramin in hormone‐refractory prostate cancer controlling for hydrocortisone treatment and flutamide withdrawal as potentially confounding variables , 1995, Cancer.

[4]  C. Coltman Vinorelbine (Navelbine)--a new agent for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a summary. , 1994, Seminars in oncology.

[5]  K. Pienta,et al.  Phase II evaluation of oral estramustine and oral etoposide in hormone-refractory adenocarcinoma of the prostate. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  C. Logothetis,et al.  Phase II study of ketoconazole combined with weekly doxorubicin in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  A. Yagoda,et al.  Cytotoxic chemotherapy for advanced hormone‐resistant prostate cancer , 1993, Cancer.

[8]  K. Tew,et al.  Combined antimicrotubule activity of estramustine and taxol in human prostatic carcinoma cell lines. , 1992, Cancer research.

[9]  H. Scher,et al.  Estramustine and vinblastine: use of prostate specific antigen as a clinical trial end point for hormone refractory prostatic cancer. , 1992, The Journal of urology.

[10]  F. Boccardo,et al.  Phase-II study of Navelbine in advanced breast cancer. , 1989, Seminars in oncology.

[11]  M. Rutberg,et al.  Proteolytic cleavage of high‐molecular‐weight microtubule‐associated proteins by the prostatic estramustine‐binding protein , 1989, The Prostate.

[12]  K. Tew,et al.  Estramustine binds a MAP-1-like protein to inhibit microtubule assembly in vitro and disrupt microtubule organization in DU 145 cells , 1988, The Journal of cell biology.

[13]  R. Priore,et al.  Comparison of flutamide and Emcyt in hormone-refractory metastatic prostatic cancer. , 1988, Urology.

[14]  W. Curran Malpractice Claims: New Data and New Trends , 1979 .

[15]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .