Finding the right yardstick: Regulation of electricity networks under heterogeneous environments

Revenue cap regulation is often combined with systematic benchmarking to reveal the managerial inefficiencies when regulating natural monopolies. One example is the European energy sector, where benchmarking is based on actual cost data, which are influenced by managerial inefficiency as well as operational heterogeneity. This paper demonstrates how a conditional nonparametric method, which allows comparison of firms operating under heterogeneous technologies, can be used to estimate managerial inefficiency. A dataset of 123 distribution firms in Norway is used to show aggregate and firm-specific effects of conditioning. We compare the models presently used by the Norwegian regulator to a suggested conditional model, thus providing a viable alternative to distinguish between managerial inefficiency and operational heterogeneity. The use of the conditional model in this regulatory context leads, first, to a decrease in aggregate efficient costs and, second, to a reallocation effect that affects the relative profitability of firms and relative customer prices, thus providing a fairer basis for setting revenue caps.

[1]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[2]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[3]  John Ruggiero,et al.  Data envelopment analysis with stochastic data , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[4]  P. Bogetoft,et al.  Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R , 2011 .

[5]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Efficiency Analysis for Exogenously Fixed Inputs and Outputs , 1986, Oper. Res..

[6]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  One-stage estimation of the effects of operational conditions and practices on productive performance: asymptotically normal and efficient, root-n consistent StoNEZD method , 2011 .

[7]  T. Koopmans Three Essays on the State of Economic Science , 1958 .

[8]  Seok-Oh Jeong,et al.  ASYMPTOTIC DISTRIBUTION OF CONICAL-HULL ESTIMATORS OF DIRECTIONAL EDGES , 2010 .

[9]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Optimal bandwidth selection for conditional efficiency measures: A data-driven approach , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Detecting Outliers in Frontier Models: A Simple Approach , 2003 .

[11]  G. Debreu,et al.  Theory of Value , 1959 .

[12]  P. Joskow Regulation of Natural Monopoly , 2007 .

[13]  John Ruggiero,et al.  On the measurement of technical efficiency in the public sector , 1996 .

[14]  Léopold Simar,et al.  How to measure the impact of environmental factors in a nonparametric production model , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  J. Florens,et al.  Nonparametric frontier estimation: a robust approach , 2002 .

[16]  Peter Bogetoft,et al.  DEA-based yardstick competition: The optimality of best practice regulation , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[17]  Subhash C. Ray,et al.  Resource-Use Efficiency in Public Schools: A Study of Connecticut Data , 1991 .

[18]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Stochastic semi-nonparametric frontier estimation of electricity distribution networks: Application of the StoNED method in the Finnish regulatory model , 2012 .

[19]  A. Shleifer,et al.  A Theory of Yardstick Competition , 1985 .

[20]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Advanced Robust and Nonparametric Methods in Efficiency Analysis: Methodology and Applications , 2007 .

[21]  Jeffrey S. Racine,et al.  Cross-Validation and the Estimation of Conditional Probability Densities , 2004 .

[22]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  ASYMPTOTICS AND CONSISTENT BOOTSTRAPS FOR DEA ESTIMATORS IN NONPARAMETRIC FRONTIER MODELS , 2008, Econometric Theory.

[23]  L. Simar,et al.  Conditional nonparametric frontier models for convex and nonconvex technologies: a unifying approach , 2007 .

[24]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Stochastic non-smooth envelopment of data: semi-parametric frontier estimation subject to shape constraints , 2012 .

[25]  Jeffrey S. Racine,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation of Conditional CDF and Quantile Functions With Mixed Categorical and Continuous Data , 2008 .

[26]  Endre Bjørndal,et al.  Benchmarking in Regulation of Electricity Networks in Norway: An Overview , 2010 .

[27]  John Ruggiero,et al.  Non-discretionary inputs in data envelopment analysis , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  J. Laffont,et al.  A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation , 1993 .

[29]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Introducing Environmental Variables in Nonparametric Frontier Models: a Probabilistic Approach , 2005 .

[30]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Nonparametric conditional efficiency measures: asymptotic properties , 2010, Ann. Oper. Res..

[31]  M. Armstrong,et al.  Recent developments in the theory of regulation , 2007 .

[32]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes , 2007 .

[33]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  The Use of Categorical Variables in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1986 .

[34]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency Scores: How to Bootstrap in Nonparametric Frontier Models , 1998 .

[35]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Inference by the m out of n bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models , 2011 .

[36]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Estimation and Inference in Nonparametric Frontier Models: Recent Developments and Perspectives , 2013 .