Development of intertectal neuronal connections in Xenopus: The effects of contralateral transposition of the eye and of eye removal

SummaryThe development of intertectal neuronal connections has been investigated in Xenopus laevis. Contralateral eye grafts and enucleations were performed in embryos and the resultant visual projections to the optic tecta were mapped electrophysiologically after metamorphosis. In enucleated animals the ipsilateral projections were found to be normally organised retinotopically but consisted of visual units with abnormally large multi-unit receptive fields. In 10 animals with contralaterally grafted eyes a normal ipsilateral projection had developed from the abnormal eye and an abnormal projection from the normal eye, to produce congruent maps via the two eyes to one tectum. All the maps in these animals were retinotopically organised. In another 11 animals the ipsilateral projection from the operated eye was fragmentary or absent, while that from the unoperated eye resembled the pattern found after enucleation. Retinotopically abnormal contralateral projections had developed in 5 animals of this group. These results suggest that prefunctional specification determines the initial development of diffuse intertectal visual connections but these may be modified by a process of binocular interaction in the presence of a normal primary contralateral input.

[1]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  The appearance, during development, of responses in the optic tectum following visual stimulation of the ipsilateral eye in Xenopus laevis. , 1972, Vision Research.

[2]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  The ipsilateral retinotectal pathway in the frog. , 1970, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology and cognate medical sciences.

[3]  L. Beazley,et al.  Factors determining decussation at the optic chiasma by developing retinotectal fibres in Xenopus , 1975, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  K. Fite,et al.  Single-unit analysis of binocular neurons in the frog optic tectum. , 1969, Experimental neurology.

[5]  W. Pitts,et al.  Evidence That Cut Optic Nerve Fibers in a Frog Regenerate to Their Proper Places in the Tectum , 1959, Science.

[6]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  The evolution of the retinotectal map during development in Xenopus , 1974, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[7]  J. Faber,et al.  Normal Table of Xenopus Laevis (Daudin) , 1958 .

[8]  M. Jacobson Development of neuronal specificity in retinal ganglion cells of Xenopus. , 1968, Developmental biology.

[9]  R. M. Gaze The formation of nerve connections , 1970 .

[10]  M. Jacobson,et al.  Development of binocularly driven single units in frogs raised with asymmetrical visual stimulation. , 1974, Experimental neurology.

[11]  H. Hirsch,et al.  Development and maintenance of connectivity in the visual system of the frog. II. The effects of eye removal. , 1973, Brain research.

[12]  M. Jacobson,et al.  THE PROJECTION OF THE BINOCULAR VISUAL FIELD ON THE OPTIC TECTA OF THE FROG , 1962 .

[13]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  Binocular interaction in the formation of specific intertectal neuronal connexions , 1970, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[14]  H. Hirsch,et al.  Development and maintenance of connectivity in the visual system of the frog. I. The effects of eye rotation and visual deprivation. , 1973, Brain research.

[15]  M. Jacobson,et al.  A study of the retinotectal projection during regeneration of the optic nerve in the frog , 1963, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.