Differential Modulation of Performance in Insight and Divergent Thinking Tasks with tDCS

While both insight and divergent thinking tasks are used to study creativity, there are reasons to believe that the two may call upon very different mechanisms. To explore this hypothesis, we administered a verbal insight task (riddles) and a divergent thinking task (verbal fluency) to 16 native English speakers and 16 non-native English speakers after they underwent Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) of the left middle temporal gyrus and right temporo- parietal junction. We found that, in the case of the insight task the depolarization of right temporo-parietal junction and hyperpolarization of left middle temporal gyrus resulted in increased performance, relative to both the control condition and the reverse stimulation condition in both groups (non-native > native speakers). However, in the case of the divergent thinking task, the same pattern of stimulation resulted in a decrease in performance, compared to the reverse stimulation condition, in the non-native speakers. We explain this dissociation in terms of differing task demands of divergent thinking and insight tasks and speculate that the greater sensitivity of non-native speakers to tDCS stimulation may be a function of less entrenched neural networks for non-native languages.

[1]  Edward M. Bowden,et al.  New approaches to demystifying insight , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  L. Cohen,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008 , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[3]  Fredrik Ullén,et al.  Cortical Regions Involved in the Generation of Musical Structures during Improvisation in Pianists , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  Eraldo Paulesu,et al.  The role of age of acquisition and language usage in early, high‐proficient bilinguals: An fMRI study during verbal fluency , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[5]  Felipe Fregni,et al.  Modulation of emotions associated with images of human pain using anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The logic of neuropsychological research and the problem of patient classification in aphasia , 1984, Brain and Language.

[7]  M. Koslowsky,et al.  tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  D. Stuss,et al.  The effects of focal anterior and posterior brain lesions on verbal fluency , 1998, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[9]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  P. Matthews,et al.  Polarity-Sensitive Modulation of Cortical Neurotransmitters by Transcranial Stimulation , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Colin G. DeYoung,et al.  Cognitive Abilities Involved in Insight Problem Solving: An Individual Differences Model , 2008 .

[12]  M. Jung-Beeman.  Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  J D Van Horn,et al.  A comparison of rCBF patterns during letter and semantic fluency. , 2000, Neuropsychology.

[14]  J. Risberg,et al.  On the neurobiology of creativity. Differences in frontal activity between high and low creative subjects , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  A. Dietrich,et al.  A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  G H Glover,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for right-hemisphere involvement in processing unusual semantic relationships. , 2000, Neuropsychology.

[17]  K. Gilhooly,et al.  Differentiating insight from non-insight problems , 2005 .

[18]  H. Petsche,et al.  Drawing on mind's canvas: Differences in cortical integration patterns between artists and non‐artists , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[19]  J. Bermúdez,et al.  The organization of the mind , 2013 .

[20]  David J. Falcone,et al.  A Modified Lateral Eye-Movement Measure, the Right Hemisphere and Creativity , 1984, Perceptual and motor skills.

[21]  C. Neuper,et al.  The creative brain: Investigation of brain activity during creative problem solving by means of EEG and FMRI , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[22]  Jubin Abutalebi,et al.  The neural basis of first and second language processing , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[23]  Gregory P. Lee,et al.  The effects of lateralized temporal lobe dysfunction on normal and semantic word fluency , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  K. Gilhooly,et al.  Executive functions in insight versus non-insight problem solving: An individual differences approach , 2009 .

[25]  Michael Öllinger,et al.  Psychological Research on Insight Problem Solving , 2009 .

[26]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  L. Gabora.  Revenge of the “Neurds”: Characterizing Creative Thought in Terms of the Structure and Dynamics of Memory , 2010, 1308.5037.

[28]  K I Taylor,et al.  Category fluency is also predominantly affected in Swiss Alzheimer's disease patients , 1997, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[29]  Gottfried Schlaug,et al.  Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Prefrontal Cortex Enhances Complex Verbal Associative Thought , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  Jens Förster,et al.  Effects of motivational cues on perceptual asymmetry: implications for creativity and analytical problem solving. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  T. Shallice,et al.  The Organisation of Mind , 2011, Cortex.

[32]  O. Razumnikova.  Creativity related cortex activity in the remote associates task , 2007, Brain Research Bulletin.

[33]  O. Vartanian.  Dissociable neural systems for analogy and metaphor: implications for the neuroscience of creativity. , 2012, British journal of psychology.

[34]  S. Mednick.  The associative basis of the creative process. , 1962, Psychological review.

[35]  Allan W. Snyder,et al.  Brain stimulation enables the solution of an inherently difficult problem , 2012, Neuroscience Letters.

[36]  M. Coltheart.  What has functional neuroimaging told us about the organization of mind? , 2011 .

[37]  Oshin Vartanian,et al.  Variable attention facilitates creative problem solving. , 2009 .

[38]  Isabell Wartenburger,et al.  Early Setting of Grammatical Processing in the Bilingual Brain , 2003, Neuron.

[39]  G. Winocur,et al.  Clustering and switching on verbal fluency: the effects of focal frontal- and temporal-lobe lesions , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  Edward M. Bowden,et al.  Aha! Insight experience correlates with solution activation in the right hemisphere , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[41]  E. Perret.  The left frontal lobe of man and the suppression of habitual responses in verbal categorical behaviour. , 1974, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  Richard J. Brown.  Neuropsychology Mental Structure , 1989 .

[43]  Kazuhisa Niki,et al.  Function of hippocampus in “insight” of problem solving , 2003, Hippocampus.

[44]  Edward M. Bowden,et al.  The Prepared Mind , 2006, Psychological science.

[45]  T. Hendler,et al.  The role of the right hemisphere in processing nonsalient metaphorical meanings: Application of Principal Components Analysis to fMRI data , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  G. Sartori,et al.  Lie-specific involvement of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in deception. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[47]  K. Meador,et al.  Effects of temporal lobectomy on generative fluency and other language functions. , 1994, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[48]  Catherine E. Snow,et al.  The Critical Period for Language Acquisition : Evidence from Second Language Learning , 2007 .

[49]  J. Henry,et al.  A meta-analytic review of verbal fluency performance following focal cortical lesions. , 2004, Neuropsychology.

[50]  Roger E. Graves,et al.  Are Creativity and Schizotypy Products of a Right Hemisphere Bias? , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[51]  A. Shimamura,et al.  Letter and category fluency in patients with frontal lobe lesions. , 1998, Neuropsychology.

[52]  Vinod Goel,et al.  Creative brains: designing in the real world† , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[53]  Vinod Goel,et al.  Anatomy of deductive reasoning , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[54]  L. Parra,et al.  Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects , 2013, The Journal of physiology.

[55]  Steven Mark Miller,et al.  The use of tDCS and CVS as methods of non-invasive brain stimulation , 2007, Brain Research Reviews.

[56]  Edward M. Bowden,et al.  Neural Activity When People Solve Verbal Problems with Insight , 2004, PLoS biology.

[57]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Physiological Basis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2011, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[58]  S. Ohlsson.  Information-processing explanations of insight and related phenomena , 1992 .

[59]  Sophie Schwartz,et al.  Role of frontal versus temporal cortex in verbal fluency as revealed by voxel-based lesion symptom mapping , 2006, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[60]  V. Goel.  Sketches of thought , 1995 .

[61]  H. Leder,et al.  Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts , 2011 .