Three-dimensional representations of G protein-coupled receptor structures and mechanisms.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. L. Baldwin,et al. Proline for alanine substitutions in the C-peptide helix of ribonuclease A. , 1991, Biochemistry.
[2] T. Jessell,et al. Molecular characterization of a functional cDNA encoding the serotonin 1c receptor. , 1988, Science.
[3] A. Lesk,et al. The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. , 1986, The EMBO journal.
[4] D. Oprian,et al. The ligand-binding domain of rhodopsin and other G protein-linked receptors , 1992, Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes.
[5] T L Blundell,et al. The evolution and structure of aminergic G protein-coupled receptors. , 1994, Receptors & channels.
[6] Differences in conformational properties of the second intracellular loop (IL2) in 5HT(2C) receptors modified by RNA editing can account for G protein coupling efficiency. , 2001, Protein engineering.
[7] C. Strader,et al. Allele-specific activation of genetically engineered receptors. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[8] P Herzyk,et al. Automated method for modeling seven-helix transmembrane receptors from experimental data. , 1995, Biophysical journal.
[9] C. Sander,et al. Can three-dimensional contacts in protein structures be predicted by analysis of correlated mutations? , 1994, Protein engineering.
[10] H Weinstein,et al. Comparative modeling and molecular dynamics studies of the delta, kappa and mu opioid receptors. , 1997, Protein engineering.
[11] J. Baldwin,et al. An alpha-carbon template for the transmembrane helices in the rhodopsin family of G-protein-coupled receptors. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.
[12] H. Weinstein,et al. Molecular dynamics simulations predict a tilted orientation for the helical region of dynorphin A(1-17) in dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine bilayers. , 2000, Biophysical journal.
[13] C. Strader,et al. A single amino acid substitution in the beta-adrenergic receptor promotes partial agonist activity from antagonists. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[14] Yi-Jun Guo,et al. Molecular basis for the interaction of histamine with the histamine H2 receptor. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[15] M. Caron,et al. Adrenergic receptors. Models for the study of receptors coupled to guanine nucleotide regulatory proteins. , 1988, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[16] R Sánchez,et al. Advances in comparative protein-structure modelling. , 1997, Current opinion in structural biology.
[17] John P. Overington,et al. Modeling α‐helical transmembrane domains: The calculation and use of substitution tables for lipid‐facing residues , 1993, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[18] Durbin,et al. Biological Sequence Analysis , 1998 .
[19] O. Lichtarge,et al. Rhodopsin activation blocked by metal-ion-binding sites linking transmembrane helices C and F , 1996, Nature.
[20] S Pascarella,et al. Easy method to predict solvent accessibility from multiple protein sequence alignments , 1998, Proteins.
[21] T. Schwartz,et al. Conversion of antagonist-binding site to metal-ion site in the tachykinin NK-1 receptor , 1995, Nature.
[22] Y. Fukada,et al. What makes red visual pigments red? A resonance Raman microprobe study of retinal chromophore structure in iodopsin. , 1994, Biochemistry.
[23] K. Konvička,et al. A proposed structure for transmembrane segment 7 of G protein-coupled receptors incorporating an asn-Pro/Asp-Pro motif. , 1998, Biophysical journal.
[24] R. Doolittle,et al. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.
[25] M. Caron. The guanine nucleotide regulatory protein-coupled receptors for nucleosides, nucleotides, amino acids and amine neurotransmitters. , 1989, Current opinion in cell biology.
[26] R. Crouch,et al. Palmitylation of a G-protein coupled receptor. Direct analysis by tandem mass spectrometry. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[27] M. Karplus,et al. CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .
[28] R. Graham,et al. Constitutive activation of a single effector pathway: evidence for multiple activation states of a G protein-coupled receptor. , 1996, Molecular pharmacology.
[29] D. Donnelly,et al. Predicting the point at which transmembrane helices protrude from the bilayer: a model of the antenna complexes from photosynthetic bacteria. , 1993, Protein engineering.
[30] J. Ballesteros,et al. The role of a conserved proline residue in mediating conformational changes associated with voltage gating of Cx32 gap junctions. , 1999, Biophysical journal.
[31] J. Ponder,et al. Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.
[32] G Vriend,et al. Predicting local structural changes that result from point mutations. , 1994, Protein engineering.
[33] Mark S.P. Sansom,et al. Hinges, swivels and switches: the role of prolines in signalling via transmembrane α-helices , 2000 .
[34] Gebhard F. X. Schertler,et al. Arrangement of rhodopsin transmembrane α-helices , 1997, Nature.
[35] T. Blundell,et al. An analysis of the periodicity of conserved residues in sequence alignments of G‐protein coupled receptors , 1989, FEBS letters.
[36] H Weinstein,et al. Related Contribution of Specific Helix 2 and 7 Residues to Conformational Activation of the Serotonin 5-HT2A Receptor (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[37] F. Fanelli,et al. Theoretical study on mutation-induced activation of the luteinizing hormone receptor. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.
[38] M. Sternberg,et al. Analysis of the relationship between side-chain conformation and secondary structure in globular proteins. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.
[39] J. Ballesteros,et al. A cluster of aromatic residues in the sixth membrane-spanning segment of the dopamine D2 receptor is accessible in the binding-site crevice. , 1998, Biochemistry.
[40] T. Gallaher,et al. Site-directed mutagenesis of the serotonin 5-hydroxytrypamine2 receptor: identification of amino acids necessary for ligand binding and receptor activation. , 1993, Molecular pharmacology.
[41] O. Lichtarge,et al. Similar structures and shared switch mechanisms of the beta2-adrenoceptor and the parathyroid hormone receptor. Zn(II) bridges between helices III and VI block activation. , 1999, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[42] A. Scheer,et al. Theoretical study on receptor-G protein recognition: new insights into the mechanism of the α1b-adrenergic receptor activation , 1999 .
[43] B. Roth,et al. Identification of conserved aromatic residues essential for agonist binding and second messenger production at 5-hydroxytryptamine2A receptors. , 1997, Molecular pharmacology.
[44] S. Vishveshwara,et al. Geometry of proline-containing alpha-helices in proteins. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.
[45] S. W. Lin,et al. Specific tryptophan UV-absorbance changes are probes of the transition of rhodopsin to its active state. , 1996, Biochemistry.
[46] H. Lester,et al. The role of conserved aspartate and serine residues in ligand binding and in function of the 5‐HT1A receptor: A site‐directed mutation study , 1992, FEBS letters.
[47] A. Sali,et al. Modeling of loops in protein structures , 2000, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[48] A. Lomize,et al. The transmembrane 7-alpha-bundle of rhodopsin: distance geometry calculations with hydrogen bonding constraints. , 1997, Biophysical journal.
[49] Role of threonine 342 in helix 7 of the 5-hydroxytryptamine type 1D receptor in ligand binding: an indirect mechanism for receptor selectivity. , 1993, Molecular pharmacology.
[50] T. Blundell,et al. Conformational analysis and clustering of short and medium size loops connecting regular secondary structures: A database for modeling and prediction , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[51] B. Roth,et al. Differential ergoline and ergopeptine binding to 5-hydroxytryptamine2A receptors: ergolines require an aromatic residue at position 340 for high affinity binding. , 1995, Molecular pharmacology.
[52] C. Chothia. Principles that determine the structure of proteins. , 1984, Annual review of biochemistry.
[53] J. Wess. Structure-function analysis of G-protein coupled receptors , 1999 .
[54] M. Maze,et al. Arrangement of Transmembrane Domains in Adrenergic Receptors , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[55] Barry Robson,et al. An algorithm for secondary structure determination in proteins based on sequence similarity , 1986, FEBS letters.
[56] F Guarnieri,et al. A refined model of the thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) receptor binding pocket. Novel mixed mode Monte Carlo/stochastic dynamics simulations of the complex between TRH and TRH receptor. , 1996, Biochemistry.
[57] B. Kobilka,et al. Adrenergic receptors as models for G protein-coupled receptors. , 1992, Annual review of neuroscience.
[58] H. Khorana,et al. Structural features and light-dependent changes in the cytoplasmic interhelical E-F loop region of rhodopsin: a site-directed spin-labeling study. , 1996, Biochemistry.
[59] T. Schwartz,et al. Partial agonism through a zinc-Ion switch constructed between transmembrane domains III and VII in the tachykinin NK(1) receptor. , 2000, Molecular pharmacology.
[60] C. Topham,et al. On the spatial disposition of the fifth transmembrane helix and the structural integrity of the transmembrane binding site in the opioid and ORL1 G protein-coupled receptor family. , 2000, Protein engineering.
[61] P. Argos,et al. Analysis of insertions/deletions in protein structures. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.
[62] I Simon,et al. New alignment strategy for transmembrane proteins. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.
[63] H Weinstein,et al. Contribution of a helix 5 locus to selectivity of hallucinogenic and nonhallucinogenic ligands for the human 5-hydroxytryptamine2A and 5-hydroxytryptamine2C receptors: direct and indirect effects on ligand affinity mediated by the same locus. , 1996, Molecular pharmacology.
[64] T. Gudermann,et al. Receptors and G proteins as primary components of transmembrane signal transduction , 1995, Journal of Molecular Medicine.
[65] H. Khorana,et al. Structure and function in rhodopsin. Cysteines 65 and 316 are in proximity in a rhodopsin mutant as indicated by disulfide formation and interactions between attached spin labels. , 1996, Biochemistry.
[66] B. Roth,et al. A single point mutation (Phe340-->Leu340) of a conserved phenylalanine abolishes 4-[125I]iodo-(2,5-dimethoxy)phenylisopropylamine and [3H]mesulergine but not [3H]ketanserin binding to 5-hydroxytryptamine2 receptors. , 1993, Molecular pharmacology.
[67] C. Deber,et al. Proline residues in transmembrane helices: structural or dynamic role? , 1991, Biochemistry.
[68] J. Ballesteros,et al. Construction of a 3D model of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor: determination of helix ends and helix orientation. , 1995, Life sciences.
[69] J. Ballesteros,et al. Residues in the seventh membrane-spanning segment of the dopamine D2 receptor accessible in the binding-site crevice. , 1996, Biochemistry.
[70] M. Sippl,et al. Structure-derived substitution matrices for alignment of distantly related sequences. , 2000, Protein engineering.
[71] D. Donnelly. The arrangement of the transmembrane helices in the secretin receptor family of G‐protein‐coupled receptors , 1997, FEBS letters.
[72] John P. Overington,et al. The prediction and orientation of alpha-helices from sequence alignments: the combined use of environment-dependent substitution tables, Fourier transform methods and helix capping rules. , 1994, Protein engineering.
[73] E C Hulme,et al. Acetylcholine mustard labels the binding site aspartate in muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[74] H Weinstein,et al. Prokink: a protocol for numerical evaluation of helix distortions by proline. , 2000, Protein engineering.
[75] M. Sternberg,et al. Prediction of protein structure from sequence. , 1990, European journal of cancer.
[76] J. Thompson,et al. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.
[77] P Argos,et al. Sensitivity comparison of protein amino acid sequences. , 1990, Methods in enzymology.
[78] A. Valencia,et al. Correlated mutations contain information about protein-protein interaction. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.
[79] Brian K. Kobilka,et al. Structural Instability of a Constitutively Active G Protein-coupled Receptor , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[80] P. Ferrara,et al. The agonist SR 146131 and the antagonist SR 27897 occupy different sites on the human CCK(1) receptor. , 2000, European journal of pharmacology.
[81] Marvin C. Gershengorn,et al. Interactions between Conserved Residues in Transmembrane Helices 1, 2, and 7 of the Thyrotropin-releasing Hormone Receptor* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[82] Robert P. Millar,et al. Functional Microdomains in G-protein-coupled Receptors , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[83] P Argos,et al. Evolution of protein cores. Constraints in point mutations as observed in globin tertiary structures. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.
[84] J. Baldwin,et al. Structure and function of receptors coupled to G proteins. , 1994, Current opinion in cell biology.
[85] H. Akil,et al. Site-directed mutagenesis of the human dopamine D2 receptor. , 1992, European journal of pharmacology.
[86] D. Oprian,et al. Rhodopsin mutation G90D and a molecular mechanism for congenital night blindness , 1994, Nature.
[87] H Weinstein,et al. Structural probing of a microdomain in the dopamine transporter by engineering of artificial Zn2+ binding sites. , 2000, Biochemistry.
[88] J. Wess,et al. Mutational Analysis of the Relative Orientation of Transmembrane Helices I and VII in G Protein-coupled Receptors (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[89] J. Ballesteros,et al. Dopamine D4/D2 receptor selectivity is determined by A divergent aromatic microdomain contained within the second, third, and seventh membrane-spanning segments. , 1999, Molecular pharmacology.
[90] H. Scheraga,et al. Conformational constraints of amino acid side chains in α‐helices , 1987 .
[91] H. Khorana,et al. Requirement of Rigid-Body Motion of Transmembrane Helices for Light Activation of Rhodopsin , 1996, Science.
[92] D Eisenberg,et al. A 3D-1D substitution matrix for protein fold recognition that includes predicted secondary structure of the sequence. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.
[93] S Salzberg,et al. Predicting protein secondary structure with a nearest-neighbor algorithm. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.
[94] A. Lomize,et al. Opioid receptor three-dimensional structures from distance geometry calculations with hydrogen bonding constraints. , 1998, Biophysical journal.
[95] K. Palczewski,et al. Crystal Structure of Rhodopsin: A G‐Protein‐Coupled Receptor , 2002, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.
[96] E. Neher. How frequent are correlated changes in families of protein sequences? , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[97] B Rost,et al. Bridging the protein sequence-structure gap by structure predictions. , 1996, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.
[98] J. Thornton,et al. Influence of proline residues on protein conformation. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.
[99] C. Sander,et al. Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins , 1994, Proteins.
[100] E. Pebay-Peyroula,et al. X-ray structure of bacteriorhodopsin at 2.5 angstroms from microcrystals grown in lipidic cubic phases. , 1997, Science.
[101] R. Hubbard,et al. Combined biophysical and biochemical information confirms arrangement of transmembrane helices visible from the three-dimensional map of frog rhodopsin. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.
[102] J. Bockaert,et al. Molecular tinkering of G protein‐coupled receptors: an evolutionary success , 1999, The EMBO journal.
[103] A. Vermeer,et al. The thermal stability of immunoglobulin: unfolding and aggregation of a multi-domain protein. , 2000, Biophysical journal.
[104] G Vriend,et al. Modeling of transmembrane seven helix bundles. , 1993, Protein engineering.
[105] John P. Overington,et al. Environment‐specific amino acid substitution tables: Tertiary templates and prediction of protein folds , 1992, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[106] S. Henikoff,et al. Amino acid substitution matrices. , 2000, Advances in protein chemistry.
[107] G. Liapakis,et al. Constitutive Activation of the β2 Adrenergic Receptor Alters the Orientation of Its Sixth Membrane-spanning Segment* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[108] T. Schwartz,et al. Connectivity and orientation of the seven helical bundle in the tachykinin NK‐1 receptor probed by zinc site engineering. , 1996, The EMBO journal.
[109] J. Skolnick,et al. Fold assembly of small proteins using monte carlo simulations driven by restraints derived from multiple sequence alignments. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.
[110] M. Caron,et al. Palmitoylation of the human beta 2-adrenergic receptor. Mutation of Cys341 in the carboxyl tail leads to an uncoupled nonpalmitoylated form of the receptor. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[111] U. Gether. Uncovering molecular mechanisms involved in activation of G protein-coupled receptors. , 2000, Endocrine reviews.
[112] Jonathan A Javitch,et al. Mapping the binding-site crevice of the dopamine D2 receptor by the substituted-cysteine accessibility method , 1995, Neuron.
[113] Marta Filizola,et al. 3D modeling, ligand binding and activation studies of the cloned mouse δ, μ and κ opioid receptors , 1999 .
[114] H. Weinstein,et al. Conformational Memories and the Exploration of Biologically Relevant Peptide Conformations: An Illustration for the Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone , 1996 .
[115] M Vihinen. Simultaneous comparison of several sequences. , 1990, Methods in enzymology.
[116] H Weinstein,et al. Agonists induce conformational changes in transmembrane domains III and VI of the β2 adrenoceptor , 1997, The EMBO journal.
[117] M Karplus,et al. Modeling of side chains, loops, and insertions in proteins. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.
[118] T. N. Bhat,et al. The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..
[119] D. Oprian,et al. A general method for mapping tertiary contacts between amino acid residues in membrane-embedded proteins. , 1995, Biochemistry.
[120] H. Weinstein,et al. The Functional Microdomain in Transmembrane Helices 2 and 7 Regulates Expression, Activation, and Coupling Pathways of the Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Receptor* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[121] J. Ballesteros,et al. The first transmembrane segment of the dopamine D2 receptor: accessibility in the binding-site crevice and position in the transmembrane bundle. , 2000, Biochemistry.
[122] G. Feher,et al. The bacterial photosynthetic reaction center as a model for membrane proteins. , 1989, Annual review of biochemistry.
[123] John Kuriyan,et al. Challenges at the frontiers of structural biology. , 1999, Trends in cell biology.
[124] H. Weinstein,et al. Ligand-induced domain motion in the activation mechanism of a G-protein-coupled receptor. , 1994, Protein engineering.
[125] G. Schertler,et al. Low resolution structure of bovine rhodopsin determined by electron cryo-microscopy. , 1995, Biophysical journal.
[126] G J Barton,et al. Protein sequence alignment techniques. , 1998, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.
[127] C. Strader,et al. Characterization of the binding domain of the beta-adrenergic receptor with the fluorescent antagonist carazolol. Evidence for a buried ligand binding site. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[128] B. Rost,et al. Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.
[129] J. Ballesteros,et al. Analysis and refinement of criteria for predicting the structure and relative orientations of transmembranal helical domains. , 1992, Biophysical journal.
[130] Leonardo Pardo,et al. Serine and Threonine Residues Bend α-Helices in the χ1 = g− Conformation , 2000 .
[131] J. Ballesteros,et al. [19] Integrated methods for the construction of three-dimensional models and computational probing of structure-function relations in G protein-coupled receptors , 1995 .
[132] F. Siebert,et al. CONFORMATIONAL CHANGES OF CYTOSOLIC LOOPS OF BOVINE RHODOPSIN DURING THE TRANSITION TO METARHODOPSIN‐II: AN INVESTIGATION BY FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED DIFFERENCE SPECTROSCOPY * , 1992, Photochemistry and photobiology.
[133] H Weinstein,et al. Mapping the Binding Site Pocket of the Serotonin 5-Hydroxytryptamine2A Receptor , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[134] T. Sakmar,et al. Functional Interaction of Transmembrane Helices 3 and 6 in Rhodopsin , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[135] S. Benner,et al. Patterns of divergence in homologous proteins as indicators of secondary and tertiary structure: a prediction of the structure of the catalytic domain of protein kinases. , 1991, Advances in enzyme regulation.