Three-dimensional representations of G protein-coupled receptor structures and mechanisms.

Publisher Summary G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been grouped into five somewhat distinct families: one resembling rhodopsin, another identified with the secretin receptor, a class related to the metabotropic glutamate receptor, another to the fungal pheromone receptor, and a class of CAMP receptors. The recent breakthrough in determining the crystal structure of rhodopsin has confirmed the general expectation that GPCRs are composed of seven helical transmembrane segments connected by intracellular and extracellular loop segments, as well as the expected topology of an extracellular N terminus and an intracellular C terminus. This chapter describes the construction, evaluation, and use of the three-dimensional (3D) molecular models of GPCRs from the various families reflects the general current understanding of their architecture. This understanding is implemented in the 3D receptor models based on a variety of direct experimental data, as well as results from various approaches from computational genomics, biophysics, and bioinformatics.

[1]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  Proline for alanine substitutions in the C-peptide helix of ribonuclease A. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[2]  T. Jessell,et al.  Molecular characterization of a functional cDNA encoding the serotonin 1c receptor. , 1988, Science.

[3]  A. Lesk,et al.  The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[4]  D. Oprian,et al.  The ligand-binding domain of rhodopsin and other G protein-linked receptors , 1992, Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes.

[5]  T L Blundell,et al.  The evolution and structure of aminergic G protein-coupled receptors. , 1994, Receptors & channels.

[6]  Differences in conformational properties of the second intracellular loop (IL2) in 5HT(2C) receptors modified by RNA editing can account for G protein coupling efficiency. , 2001, Protein engineering.

[7]  C. Strader,et al.  Allele-specific activation of genetically engineered receptors. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[8]  P Herzyk,et al.  Automated method for modeling seven-helix transmembrane receptors from experimental data. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[9]  C. Sander,et al.  Can three-dimensional contacts in protein structures be predicted by analysis of correlated mutations? , 1994, Protein engineering.

[10]  H Weinstein,et al.  Comparative modeling and molecular dynamics studies of the delta, kappa and mu opioid receptors. , 1997, Protein engineering.

[11]  J. Baldwin,et al.  An alpha-carbon template for the transmembrane helices in the rhodopsin family of G-protein-coupled receptors. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  H. Weinstein,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations predict a tilted orientation for the helical region of dynorphin A(1-17) in dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine bilayers. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[13]  C. Strader,et al.  A single amino acid substitution in the beta-adrenergic receptor promotes partial agonist activity from antagonists. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[14]  Yi-Jun Guo,et al.  Molecular basis for the interaction of histamine with the histamine H2 receptor. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[15]  M. Caron,et al.  Adrenergic receptors. Models for the study of receptors coupled to guanine nucleotide regulatory proteins. , 1988, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[16]  R Sánchez,et al.  Advances in comparative protein-structure modelling. , 1997, Current opinion in structural biology.

[17]  John P. Overington,et al.  Modeling α‐helical transmembrane domains: The calculation and use of substitution tables for lipid‐facing residues , 1993, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[18]  Durbin,et al.  Biological Sequence Analysis , 1998 .

[19]  O. Lichtarge,et al.  Rhodopsin activation blocked by metal-ion-binding sites linking transmembrane helices C and F , 1996, Nature.

[20]  S Pascarella,et al.  Easy method to predict solvent accessibility from multiple protein sequence alignments , 1998, Proteins.

[21]  T. Schwartz,et al.  Conversion of antagonist-binding site to metal-ion site in the tachykinin NK-1 receptor , 1995, Nature.

[22]  Y. Fukada,et al.  What makes red visual pigments red? A resonance Raman microprobe study of retinal chromophore structure in iodopsin. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[23]  K. Konvička,et al.  A proposed structure for transmembrane segment 7 of G protein-coupled receptors incorporating an asn-Pro/Asp-Pro motif. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[24]  R. Doolittle,et al.  A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  M. Caron The guanine nucleotide regulatory protein-coupled receptors for nucleosides, nucleotides, amino acids and amine neurotransmitters. , 1989, Current opinion in cell biology.

[26]  R. Crouch,et al.  Palmitylation of a G-protein coupled receptor. Direct analysis by tandem mass spectrometry. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[27]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[28]  R. Graham,et al.  Constitutive activation of a single effector pathway: evidence for multiple activation states of a G protein-coupled receptor. , 1996, Molecular pharmacology.

[29]  D. Donnelly,et al.  Predicting the point at which transmembrane helices protrude from the bilayer: a model of the antenna complexes from photosynthetic bacteria. , 1993, Protein engineering.

[30]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  The role of a conserved proline residue in mediating conformational changes associated with voltage gating of Cx32 gap junctions. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[31]  J. Ponder,et al.  Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  G Vriend,et al.  Predicting local structural changes that result from point mutations. , 1994, Protein engineering.

[33]  Mark S.P. Sansom,et al.  Hinges, swivels and switches: the role of prolines in signalling via transmembrane α-helices , 2000 .

[34]  Gebhard F. X. Schertler,et al.  Arrangement of rhodopsin transmembrane α-helices , 1997, Nature.

[35]  T. Blundell,et al.  An analysis of the periodicity of conserved residues in sequence alignments of G‐protein coupled receptors , 1989, FEBS letters.

[36]  H Weinstein,et al.  Related Contribution of Specific Helix 2 and 7 Residues to Conformational Activation of the Serotonin 5-HT2A Receptor (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[37]  F. Fanelli,et al.  Theoretical study on mutation-induced activation of the luteinizing hormone receptor. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Analysis of the relationship between side-chain conformation and secondary structure in globular proteins. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  A cluster of aromatic residues in the sixth membrane-spanning segment of the dopamine D2 receptor is accessible in the binding-site crevice. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[40]  T. Gallaher,et al.  Site-directed mutagenesis of the serotonin 5-hydroxytrypamine2 receptor: identification of amino acids necessary for ligand binding and receptor activation. , 1993, Molecular pharmacology.

[41]  O. Lichtarge,et al.  Similar structures and shared switch mechanisms of the beta2-adrenoceptor and the parathyroid hormone receptor. Zn(II) bridges between helices III and VI block activation. , 1999, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[42]  A. Scheer,et al.  Theoretical study on receptor-G protein recognition: new insights into the mechanism of the α1b-adrenergic receptor activation , 1999 .

[43]  B. Roth,et al.  Identification of conserved aromatic residues essential for agonist binding and second messenger production at 5-hydroxytryptamine2A receptors. , 1997, Molecular pharmacology.

[44]  S. Vishveshwara,et al.  Geometry of proline-containing alpha-helices in proteins. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[45]  S. W. Lin,et al.  Specific tryptophan UV-absorbance changes are probes of the transition of rhodopsin to its active state. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[46]  H. Lester,et al.  The role of conserved aspartate and serine residues in ligand binding and in function of the 5‐HT1A receptor: A site‐directed mutation study , 1992, FEBS letters.

[47]  A. Sali,et al.  Modeling of loops in protein structures , 2000, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[48]  A. Lomize,et al.  The transmembrane 7-alpha-bundle of rhodopsin: distance geometry calculations with hydrogen bonding constraints. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[49]  Role of threonine 342 in helix 7 of the 5-hydroxytryptamine type 1D receptor in ligand binding: an indirect mechanism for receptor selectivity. , 1993, Molecular pharmacology.

[50]  T. Blundell,et al.  Conformational analysis and clustering of short and medium size loops connecting regular secondary structures: A database for modeling and prediction , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[51]  B. Roth,et al.  Differential ergoline and ergopeptine binding to 5-hydroxytryptamine2A receptors: ergolines require an aromatic residue at position 340 for high affinity binding. , 1995, Molecular pharmacology.

[52]  C. Chothia Principles that determine the structure of proteins. , 1984, Annual review of biochemistry.

[53]  J. Wess Structure-function analysis of G-protein coupled receptors , 1999 .

[54]  M. Maze,et al.  Arrangement of Transmembrane Domains in Adrenergic Receptors , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[55]  Barry Robson,et al.  An algorithm for secondary structure determination in proteins based on sequence similarity , 1986, FEBS letters.

[56]  F Guarnieri,et al.  A refined model of the thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) receptor binding pocket. Novel mixed mode Monte Carlo/stochastic dynamics simulations of the complex between TRH and TRH receptor. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[57]  B. Kobilka,et al.  Adrenergic receptors as models for G protein-coupled receptors. , 1992, Annual review of neuroscience.

[58]  H. Khorana,et al.  Structural features and light-dependent changes in the cytoplasmic interhelical E-F loop region of rhodopsin: a site-directed spin-labeling study. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[59]  T. Schwartz,et al.  Partial agonism through a zinc-Ion switch constructed between transmembrane domains III and VII in the tachykinin NK(1) receptor. , 2000, Molecular pharmacology.

[60]  C. Topham,et al.  On the spatial disposition of the fifth transmembrane helix and the structural integrity of the transmembrane binding site in the opioid and ORL1 G protein-coupled receptor family. , 2000, Protein engineering.

[61]  P. Argos,et al.  Analysis of insertions/deletions in protein structures. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[62]  I Simon,et al.  New alignment strategy for transmembrane proteins. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[63]  H Weinstein,et al.  Contribution of a helix 5 locus to selectivity of hallucinogenic and nonhallucinogenic ligands for the human 5-hydroxytryptamine2A and 5-hydroxytryptamine2C receptors: direct and indirect effects on ligand affinity mediated by the same locus. , 1996, Molecular pharmacology.

[64]  T. Gudermann,et al.  Receptors and G proteins as primary components of transmembrane signal transduction , 1995, Journal of Molecular Medicine.

[65]  H. Khorana,et al.  Structure and function in rhodopsin. Cysteines 65 and 316 are in proximity in a rhodopsin mutant as indicated by disulfide formation and interactions between attached spin labels. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[66]  B. Roth,et al.  A single point mutation (Phe340-->Leu340) of a conserved phenylalanine abolishes 4-[125I]iodo-(2,5-dimethoxy)phenylisopropylamine and [3H]mesulergine but not [3H]ketanserin binding to 5-hydroxytryptamine2 receptors. , 1993, Molecular pharmacology.

[67]  C. Deber,et al.  Proline residues in transmembrane helices: structural or dynamic role? , 1991, Biochemistry.

[68]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  Construction of a 3D model of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor: determination of helix ends and helix orientation. , 1995, Life sciences.

[69]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  Residues in the seventh membrane-spanning segment of the dopamine D2 receptor accessible in the binding-site crevice. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[70]  M. Sippl,et al.  Structure-derived substitution matrices for alignment of distantly related sequences. , 2000, Protein engineering.

[71]  D. Donnelly The arrangement of the transmembrane helices in the secretin receptor family of G‐protein‐coupled receptors , 1997, FEBS letters.

[72]  John P. Overington,et al.  The prediction and orientation of alpha-helices from sequence alignments: the combined use of environment-dependent substitution tables, Fourier transform methods and helix capping rules. , 1994, Protein engineering.

[73]  E C Hulme,et al.  Acetylcholine mustard labels the binding site aspartate in muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[74]  H Weinstein,et al.  Prokink: a protocol for numerical evaluation of helix distortions by proline. , 2000, Protein engineering.

[75]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Prediction of protein structure from sequence. , 1990, European journal of cancer.

[76]  J. Thompson,et al.  CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[77]  P Argos,et al.  Sensitivity comparison of protein amino acid sequences. , 1990, Methods in enzymology.

[78]  A. Valencia,et al.  Correlated mutations contain information about protein-protein interaction. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[79]  Brian K. Kobilka,et al.  Structural Instability of a Constitutively Active G Protein-coupled Receptor , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[80]  P. Ferrara,et al.  The agonist SR 146131 and the antagonist SR 27897 occupy different sites on the human CCK(1) receptor. , 2000, European journal of pharmacology.

[81]  Marvin C. Gershengorn,et al.  Interactions between Conserved Residues in Transmembrane Helices 1, 2, and 7 of the Thyrotropin-releasing Hormone Receptor* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[82]  Robert P. Millar,et al.  Functional Microdomains in G-protein-coupled Receptors , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[83]  P Argos,et al.  Evolution of protein cores. Constraints in point mutations as observed in globin tertiary structures. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[84]  J. Baldwin,et al.  Structure and function of receptors coupled to G proteins. , 1994, Current opinion in cell biology.

[85]  H. Akil,et al.  Site-directed mutagenesis of the human dopamine D2 receptor. , 1992, European journal of pharmacology.

[86]  D. Oprian,et al.  Rhodopsin mutation G90D and a molecular mechanism for congenital night blindness , 1994, Nature.

[87]  H Weinstein,et al.  Structural probing of a microdomain in the dopamine transporter by engineering of artificial Zn2+ binding sites. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[88]  J. Wess,et al.  Mutational Analysis of the Relative Orientation of Transmembrane Helices I and VII in G Protein-coupled Receptors (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[89]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  Dopamine D4/D2 receptor selectivity is determined by A divergent aromatic microdomain contained within the second, third, and seventh membrane-spanning segments. , 1999, Molecular pharmacology.

[90]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Conformational constraints of amino acid side chains in α‐helices , 1987 .

[91]  H. Khorana,et al.  Requirement of Rigid-Body Motion of Transmembrane Helices for Light Activation of Rhodopsin , 1996, Science.

[92]  D Eisenberg,et al.  A 3D-1D substitution matrix for protein fold recognition that includes predicted secondary structure of the sequence. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[93]  S Salzberg,et al.  Predicting protein secondary structure with a nearest-neighbor algorithm. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[94]  A. Lomize,et al.  Opioid receptor three-dimensional structures from distance geometry calculations with hydrogen bonding constraints. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[95]  K. Palczewski,et al.  Crystal Structure of Rhodopsin: A G‐Protein‐Coupled Receptor , 2002, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[96]  E. Neher How frequent are correlated changes in families of protein sequences? , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[97]  B Rost,et al.  Bridging the protein sequence-structure gap by structure predictions. , 1996, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[98]  J. Thornton,et al.  Influence of proline residues on protein conformation. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[99]  C. Sander,et al.  Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins , 1994, Proteins.

[100]  E. Pebay-Peyroula,et al.  X-ray structure of bacteriorhodopsin at 2.5 angstroms from microcrystals grown in lipidic cubic phases. , 1997, Science.

[101]  R. Hubbard,et al.  Combined biophysical and biochemical information confirms arrangement of transmembrane helices visible from the three-dimensional map of frog rhodopsin. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[102]  J. Bockaert,et al.  Molecular tinkering of G protein‐coupled receptors: an evolutionary success , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[103]  A. Vermeer,et al.  The thermal stability of immunoglobulin: unfolding and aggregation of a multi-domain protein. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[104]  G Vriend,et al.  Modeling of transmembrane seven helix bundles. , 1993, Protein engineering.

[105]  John P. Overington,et al.  Environment‐specific amino acid substitution tables: Tertiary templates and prediction of protein folds , 1992, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[106]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Amino acid substitution matrices. , 2000, Advances in protein chemistry.

[107]  G. Liapakis,et al.  Constitutive Activation of the β2 Adrenergic Receptor Alters the Orientation of Its Sixth Membrane-spanning Segment* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[108]  T. Schwartz,et al.  Connectivity and orientation of the seven helical bundle in the tachykinin NK‐1 receptor probed by zinc site engineering. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[109]  J. Skolnick,et al.  Fold assembly of small proteins using monte carlo simulations driven by restraints derived from multiple sequence alignments. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[110]  M. Caron,et al.  Palmitoylation of the human beta 2-adrenergic receptor. Mutation of Cys341 in the carboxyl tail leads to an uncoupled nonpalmitoylated form of the receptor. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[111]  U. Gether Uncovering molecular mechanisms involved in activation of G protein-coupled receptors. , 2000, Endocrine reviews.

[112]  Jonathan A Javitch,et al.  Mapping the binding-site crevice of the dopamine D2 receptor by the substituted-cysteine accessibility method , 1995, Neuron.

[113]  Marta Filizola,et al.  3D modeling, ligand binding and activation studies of the cloned mouse δ, μ and κ opioid receptors , 1999 .

[114]  H. Weinstein,et al.  Conformational Memories and the Exploration of Biologically Relevant Peptide Conformations: An Illustration for the Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone , 1996 .

[115]  M Vihinen Simultaneous comparison of several sequences. , 1990, Methods in enzymology.

[116]  H Weinstein,et al.  Agonists induce conformational changes in transmembrane domains III and VI of the β2 adrenoceptor , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[117]  M Karplus,et al.  Modeling of side chains, loops, and insertions in proteins. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[118]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[119]  D. Oprian,et al.  A general method for mapping tertiary contacts between amino acid residues in membrane-embedded proteins. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[120]  H. Weinstein,et al.  The Functional Microdomain in Transmembrane Helices 2 and 7 Regulates Expression, Activation, and Coupling Pathways of the Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Receptor* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[121]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  The first transmembrane segment of the dopamine D2 receptor: accessibility in the binding-site crevice and position in the transmembrane bundle. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[122]  G. Feher,et al.  The bacterial photosynthetic reaction center as a model for membrane proteins. , 1989, Annual review of biochemistry.

[123]  John Kuriyan,et al.  Challenges at the frontiers of structural biology. , 1999, Trends in cell biology.

[124]  H. Weinstein,et al.  Ligand-induced domain motion in the activation mechanism of a G-protein-coupled receptor. , 1994, Protein engineering.

[125]  G. Schertler,et al.  Low resolution structure of bovine rhodopsin determined by electron cryo-microscopy. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[126]  G J Barton,et al.  Protein sequence alignment techniques. , 1998, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[127]  C. Strader,et al.  Characterization of the binding domain of the beta-adrenergic receptor with the fluorescent antagonist carazolol. Evidence for a buried ligand binding site. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[128]  B. Rost,et al.  Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[129]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  Analysis and refinement of criteria for predicting the structure and relative orientations of transmembranal helical domains. , 1992, Biophysical journal.

[130]  Leonardo Pardo,et al.  Serine and Threonine Residues Bend α-Helices in the χ1 = g− Conformation , 2000 .

[131]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  [19] Integrated methods for the construction of three-dimensional models and computational probing of structure-function relations in G protein-coupled receptors , 1995 .

[132]  F. Siebert,et al.  CONFORMATIONAL CHANGES OF CYTOSOLIC LOOPS OF BOVINE RHODOPSIN DURING THE TRANSITION TO METARHODOPSIN‐II: AN INVESTIGATION BY FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED DIFFERENCE SPECTROSCOPY * , 1992, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[133]  H Weinstein,et al.  Mapping the Binding Site Pocket of the Serotonin 5-Hydroxytryptamine2A Receptor , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[134]  T. Sakmar,et al.  Functional Interaction of Transmembrane Helices 3 and 6 in Rhodopsin , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[135]  S. Benner,et al.  Patterns of divergence in homologous proteins as indicators of secondary and tertiary structure: a prediction of the structure of the catalytic domain of protein kinases. , 1991, Advances in enzyme regulation.