Thinking about the future: The role of spatial metaphors for time

People often use spatial language to talk about time, and this is known to both reflect and shape how they think about it. Despite much research on the spatial grounding of temporal language and thought, little attention has been given to how spatial metaphors influence reasoning about real events, especially those in the future. In a large online study (N=2362), we framed a discussion of climate change using spatial metaphors that varied on reference-frame (egovs. time-moving), speed of movement (fast vs. slow), and time horizon (near, medium, or far future). We found that describing climate change as approaching (time-moving frame) – versus something we approach – made the issue seem more serious, but also more tractable, at least when the rate of motion was fast (e.g., “it’s rapidly approaching”). These findings offer novel insights into the relationship between spatial metaphors and temporal reasoning and how we communicate about uncertain future events.

[1]  A. Leiserowitz Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery, and Values , 2006 .

[2]  Lera Boroditsky,et al.  Do English and Mandarin Speakers Think Differently About Time , 2008 .

[3]  R. Rice,et al.  Chapter 9. Establishing Common Ground: Finding Better Ways to Communicate About Climate Disruption , 2016 .

[4]  L. Boroditsky Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors , 2000, Cognition.

[5]  H. H. Clark SPACE, TIME, SEMANTICS, AND THE CHILD , 1973 .

[6]  M. McGlone,et al.  Back (or forward?) to the future: The role of perspective in temporal language comprehension. , 1998 .

[7]  J. Zinken,et al.  A feeling for the future: How does agency in time metaphors relate to feelings? , 2012 .

[8]  Teenie Matlock,et al.  Metaphors for the War (or Race) against Climate Change , 2017 .

[9]  Kensy Cooperrider,et al.  The tangle of space and time in human cognition , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1981 .

[11]  Lera Boroditsky,et al.  How Languages Construct Time , 2011 .

[12]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[13]  G. Dunteman Principal Components Analysis , 1989 .

[14]  D. Casasanto,et al.  Perceptual foundations of abstract thought , 2005 .

[15]  Sarah E. Duffy,et al.  Moving Through Time: The Role of Personality in Three Real-Life Contexts , 2014, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  Lera Boroditsky,et al.  The Roles of Body and Mind in Abstract Thought , 2002, Psychological science.

[17]  Adam J. Berinsky,et al.  Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk , 2012, Political Analysis.

[18]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  NASA Faked the Moon Landing—Therefore, (Climate) Science Is a Hoax , 2013, Psychological science.

[19]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Multivariate Analysis , 1958, Nature.

[20]  Sarah E. Duffy,et al.  Individual differences in the interpretation of ambiguous statements about time , 2014 .