Simultaneous recordings of visual evoked potentials and BOLD MRI activations in response to visual motion processing

Visual motion processing in humans was studied by simultaneous 32‐channel electroencephalography (EEG) recordings of visual evoked potentials and BOLD MRI activations at 2.9 T. The paradigms compared three different random dot patterns (12 s duration) with stationary random dots (18 s) or with each other. The stimuli represented pattern reversal (500 ms switches between two stationary patterns), motion onset (200 ms of starfield motion followed by 1000 ms of stationary dots) and motion reversal (reversal of moving starfield directions every 1000 ms). Whereas motion‐evoked visual potentials, and in particular the N2 component in occipito‐temporal channels, were most prominent for motion onset, the most extended BOLD MRI activations and strongest signal changes in V5/MT+ were obtained in response to motion reversal. These apparently contradictory findings most likely reflect different physiological aspects of the neural activity associated with visual motion processing. For example, desynchronized activity of subpopulations of cortical neurons inside V5/MT+ is expected to attenuate visual evoked potentials in scalp recordings while continuously driving metabolic demands that lead to sustained BOLD MRI responses. The understanding of the physiological correlates and neural processes underlying either technique is fundamental to exploring fully the potential of combined EEG–MRI for studying human brain function at both high temporal and spatial resolution. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  S. Luck,et al.  Neural sources of focused attention in visual search. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  Richard B Buxton,et al.  Putting spatial attention on the map: timing and localization of stimulus selection processes in striate and extrastriate visual areas , 2001, Vision Research.

[3]  Nikos K. Logothetis,et al.  Motion Processing in the Macaque: Revisited with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Antigona Martínez,et al.  Source analysis of event-related cortical activity during visuo-spatial attention. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  Louis Lemieux,et al.  Identification of EEG Events in the MR Scanner: The Problem of Pulse Artifact and a Method for Its Subtraction , 1998, NeuroImage.

[6]  A. Dale,et al.  Visual motion aftereffect in human cortical area MT revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, Nature.

[7]  Manbir Singh,et al.  Correlation between BOLD‐fMRI and EEG signal changes in response to visual stimulus frequency in humans , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  O. Arthurs,et al.  What aspect of the fMRI BOLD signal best reflects the underlying electrophysiology in human somatosensory cortex? , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Recovery of fMRI activation in motion area MT following storage of the motion aftereffect. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  R. Andersen,et al.  Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  Louis Lemieux,et al.  EEG/Functional MRI in Epilepsy: The Queen Square Experience , 2004, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[12]  Michael Bach,et al.  Adaptation characteristics of steady-state motion visual evoked potentials , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Identification of the neural sources of the pattern-reversal VEP , 2005, NeuroImage.

[14]  Colin Blakemore,et al.  Contrast dependence of motion-onset and pattern-reversal evoked potentials , 1995, Vision Research.

[15]  G A Orban,et al.  Human cerebral activity evoked by motion reversal and motion onset. A PET study. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  J Baudewig,et al.  Thresholding in correlation analyses of magnetic resonance functional neuroimaging. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[17]  L. Jäncke,et al.  Calibrated LCD/TFT stimulus presentation for visual psychophysics in fMRI , 2002, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[18]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal Basis of the Motion Aftereffect Reconsidered , 2001, Neuron.

[19]  Jens Schwarzbach,et al.  Attentional inhibition of visual processing in human striate and extrastriate cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[20]  P. Fox,et al.  Intersubject variability of functional areas in the human visual cortex , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[21]  P. M. Matthews,et al.  Attention differentially modulates the coupling of fMRI BOLD and evoked potential signal amplitudes in the human somatosensory cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  J. Gotman,et al.  Combining EEG and fMRI in Epilepsy: Methodological Challenges and Clinical Results , 2004, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[23]  R. Müller,et al.  The influence of grating contrast on the human cortical potential visually evoked by motion. , 1988, Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis.

[24]  M Bach,et al.  Coupling of neural activity and BOLD fMRI response: New insights by combination of fMRI and VEP experiments in transition from single events to continuous stimulation , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  A. M. Dale,et al.  Spatiotemporal Brain Imaging of Visual-Evoked Activity Using Interleaved EEG and fMRI Recordings , 2001, NeuroImage.

[26]  Milena Mihaylova,et al.  Peripheral and central delay in processing high spatial frequencies: reaction time and VEP latency studies , 1999, Vision Research.

[27]  R. Müller,et al.  The effect of movement adaptation on human cortical potentials evoked by pattern movement. , 1986, Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis.

[28]  C. N. Guy,et al.  fMRI and EEG Responses to Periodic Visual Stimulation , 1999, NeuroImage.

[29]  Michael Bach,et al.  Contrast dependency of motion-onset and pattern-reversal VEPs: Interaction of stimulus type, recording site and response component , 1997, Vision Research.

[30]  Robert Turner,et al.  A Method for Removing Imaging Artifact from Continuous EEG Recorded during Functional MRI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[31]  Stephen J. Anderson,et al.  Attentional modulation of oscillatory activity in human visual cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[32]  A. Vassilev,et al.  On the delay in processing high spatial frequency visual information: reaction time and VEP latency study of the effect of local intensity of stimulation , 2002, Vision Research.

[33]  D. Heeger,et al.  Retinotopy and Functional Subdivision of Human Areas MT and MST , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A direct demonstration of functional specialization in human visual cortex , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[35]  H Spekreijse,et al.  Temporal and spatial congruence of components of motion-onset evoked responses investigated by whole-head magneto-electroencephalography , 2004, Vision Research.

[36]  Gyula Kovács,et al.  Direct current stimulation over MT+/V5 modulates motion aftereffect in humans , 2004, Neuroreport.

[37]  J W Belliveau,et al.  Visual evoked potential (VEP) measured by simultaneous 64-channel EEG and 3T fMRI. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[38]  N. Logothetis.  The Underpinnings of the BOLD Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signal , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  W. Paulus,et al.  Identification of the visual motion area (area V5) in the human brain by dipole source analysis , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  M Niedeggen,et al.  Motion Aftereffects with Random-Dot Chequerboard Kinematograms: Relation between Psychophysical and VEP Measures , 1994, Perception.

[41]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The physiological basis of attentional modulation in extrastriate visual areas , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  Isolation and characteristics of a steady-state visually-evoked potential in humans related to the motion of a stimulus , 1995, Vision Research.