Maximizing affluence within the planetary boundaries

PurposeOrdinary product LCA studies focus on measuring or minimizing environmental impact, but do not address if the product fits in a sustainable consumption pattern. This paper proposes a setup in which the planetary boundaries define the maximum impact, and the minimum requirements for a reasonable consumption level specify a lower impact level. Thus, a “safe operating space” remains.MethodsWe use an IO table for EU-27 and the consumption pattern of the Bulgarian population extrapolated to the EU level as driving climate impact. The EU’s policy targets are used as a planetary boundary for climate change.ResultsThe 2020 target is shown to be able to accommodate the Bulgarian-style consumption, with room for a much higher GDP. The 2050 target, however, is too narrow, and a slightly smaller consumption pattern is needed to reach the target.ConclusionsAlthough the approach is highly simplified and neglects many developments, the idea of using IO-tables and minimum consumption levels to backcast directions to be taken is expected to help policymakers. We acknowledge some important limitations of our approach, but accept these in the context of exploring future scenarios and how to get there, instead of predicting the future.

[1]  Peter B. Denyer,et al.  The First Generation , 1988 .

[2]  O. Mont,et al.  The Impacts of Household Consumption and Options for Change , 2010 .

[3]  Kristen Averyt,et al.  Climate change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Group I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. , 2007 .

[4]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Life Cycle Sustainability Analysis , 2012 .

[5]  Alberte Bondeau,et al.  Harvesting the sun: New estimations of the maximum population of planet Earth , 2011 .

[6]  Arief Adhitya,et al.  Decision support for green supply chain operations by integrating dynamic simulation and LCA indicators: diaper case study. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Saleem H. Ali,et al.  Quality of life: an approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being , 2007 .

[8]  R. Bellman,et al.  Linear Programming and Economic Analysis. , 1958 .

[9]  Arnold Tukker,et al.  Environmental Impacts of Products: A Detailed Review of Studies , 2006 .

[10]  Stephen M. Wheeler,et al.  State and Municipal Climate Change Plans: The First Generation , 2008 .

[11]  F. Duchin Industrial input-output analysis: implications for industrial ecology. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  K. E. Webster,et al.  Regional trends in aquatic recovery from acidification in North America and Europe , 1999, Nature.

[13]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[15]  Peter James,et al.  Driving Eco-Innovation: A Breakthrough Discipline for Innovation and Sustainability , 1996 .

[16]  F. Schmidt‐bleek,et al.  Factor 10: The future of stuff , 2008 .

[17]  T. Goodwin Harvesting the sun , 1968 .

[18]  D W Pennington,et al.  Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications , 2004 .

[19]  G. H. Brundtland World Commission on environment and development , 1985 .

[20]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[21]  John Holmberg,et al.  Backcasting: A Natural Step in Operationalising Sustainable Development(*) , 1998 .

[22]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Quantified Eco-Efficiency , 2007 .

[23]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  IMPACT OF POPULATION GROWTH , 1971, Science.

[24]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Life Cycle Sustainability Analysis , 2011 .

[25]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Quantified eco-efficiency : an introduction with applications , 2007 .