Patient comprehension of information for shared treatment decision making: state of the art and future directions.

How does the way that information is presented potentially influence patients' consent for health treatments, in a shared decision making process? The goal of this paper is to present an overview of selected recent literature concerning patient health information presentation/use for treatment decision making. Recent work with patient populations has begun to extend early cognitive psychological work showing systematic biases in thinking. Key research findings are organized by type of format (probability, graphic, and qualitative/quantitative dimensions). The applied literature on this topic is amenable to only limited integration in regard to key findings, and relatively few novel approaches to improving information comprehension have been described in the health literature. Promising approaches being proposed, developed, and tested are described, such as enhanced-access computerized patient choice modules, "debiasing" techniques, and tailoring of information. Additional theoretical and practical issues are discussed, as well as selected policy implications of current knowledge.

[1]  W. Levinson,et al.  Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. , 1999, JAMA.

[2]  D. Mazur Information Disclosure and Beyond: , 2000, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[3]  On the Role of Framing Effects in Assessment of Health-related Utilities , 1999, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[4]  Katrina Armstrong,et al.  Effect of Framing as Gain versus Loss on Understanding and Hypothetical Treatment Choices: Survival and Mortality Curves , 2002, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[5]  D H Hickam,et al.  How Patients' Preferences for Risk Information Influence Treatment Choice in a Case of High Risk and High Therapeutic Uncertainty , 1999, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[6]  D H Hickam,et al.  Patients’ interpretations of probability terms , 1991, Journal of general internal medicine.

[7]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Presenting risk information--a review of the effects of "framing" and other manipulations on patient outcomes. , 2001, Journal of health communication.

[8]  N. Boyd,et al.  Eliciting Preferences for Alternative Cancer Drug Treatments , 1985, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[9]  S. Piantadosi,et al.  Effect of patients' expectations of benefit with standard breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy on participation in a randomized clinical trial: a clinical vignette study. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  J. Merz,et al.  How the Manner of Presentation of Data Influences Older Patients in Determining Their Treatment Preferences , 1993, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[11]  T. Marteau,et al.  Framing of information: its influence upon decisions of doctors and patients. , 1989, The British journal of social psychology.

[12]  C. McHorney,et al.  Frequency or Probability? A Qualitative Study of Risk Communication Formats Used in Health Care , 2001, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[13]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[14]  J. Kagan,et al.  Rational choice in an uncertain world , 1988 .

[15]  C. Moore,et al.  Perspective-Taking Judgments of Medication Acceptance: Inferences from Relative Importance about the Impact and Combination of Information , 1996 .

[16]  D H Hickam,et al.  Patients' Preferences for Risk Disclosure and Role in Decision Making for Invasive Medical Procedures , 1997, Journal of general internal medicine.

[17]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[18]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Treating people with information: an analysis and review of approaches to communicating health risk information. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[19]  A. Marcus New directions for risk communication research: a discussion with additional suggestions. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[20]  C. Russell Living can be hazardous to your health: how the news media cover cancer risks. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[21]  R J Donovan,et al.  Positive versus Negative Framing of a Hypothetical Infant Immunization: The Influence of Involvement , 2000, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[22]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Moving to the mainstream , 2001 .

[23]  A Coulter,et al.  Patient choice modules for summaries of clinical effectiveness: a proposal , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[24]  Tom Ferguson,et al.  From patients to end users , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  Communication for better decisions: Not about ‘risk' , 1999 .

[26]  A Coulter,et al.  Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough? , 1999, BMJ.

[27]  Amiram Gafni,et al.  What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment? , 1999, BMJ.

[28]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Adaptive Thinking: Rationality in the Real World , 2000 .

[29]  D H Hickam,et al.  Patients' and Physicians' Interpretations of Graphic Data Displays , 1993, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[30]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  The visual communication of risk. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[31]  Peter Salovey,et al.  The Influence of Message Framing on Intentions to Perform Health Behaviors , 1993 .

[32]  H. Welch,et al.  Women's Perceptions of Breast Cancer Risk , 1999, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[33]  T A Sheldon,et al.  Supporting consumer involvement in decision making: what constitutes quality in consumer health information? , 1996, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[34]  Petra Wilson,et al.  The quality of health information on the internet , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[35]  J. Merz,et al.  How age, outcome severity, and scale influence general medicine clinic patients’ interpretations of verbal probability terms , 1994, Journal of general internal medicine.

[36]  A. Edwards,et al.  The role of decision aids in promoting evidence-based patient choice , 2001 .

[37]  D H Hickam,et al.  Interpretation of graphic data by patients in a general medicine clinic , 1990, Journal of general internal medicine.

[38]  G. Elwyn,et al.  How Should Effectiveness of Risk Communication to Aid Patients' Decisions Be Judged? , 1999, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[39]  C D Naylor,et al.  Communicating the Benefits of Chronic Preventive Therapy , 1995, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[40]  V. Leirer,et al.  Icons improve older and younger adults' comprehension of medication information. , 1998, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[41]  Nancy L. Kocovski,et al.  Perception of Quantitative Information for Treatment Decisions , 2000, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[42]  P. Rozin,et al.  Lay American conceptions of nutrition: dose insensitivity, categorical thinking, contagion, and the monotonic mind. , 1996, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[43]  B. Rimer,et al.  General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples , 2001, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[44]  Mazur Dj,et al.  Five-year survival curves: how much data are enough for patient-physician decision making in general surgery? , 1996 .