Impact of Incorrect Model Error Assumptions on the Sequential Assimilation of Remotely Sensed Surface Soil Moisture

Data assimilation approaches require some type of state forecast error covariance information in order to optimally merge model predictions with observations. The ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) dynamically derives such information through a Monte Carlo approach and the introduction of random noise in model states, fluxes, and/or forcing data. However, in land data assimilation, relatively little guidance exists concerning strategies for selecting the appropriate magnitude and/or type of introduced model noise. In addition, little is known about the sensitivity of filter prediction accuracy to (potentially) inappropriate assumptions concerning the source and magnitude of modeling error. Using a series of synthetic identical twin experiments, this analysis explores the consequences of making incorrect assumptions concerning the source and magnitude of model error on the efficiency of assimilating surface soil moisture observations to constrain deeper root-zone soil moisture predictions made by a land surface model. Results suggest that inappropriate model error assumptions can lead to circumstances in which the assimilation of surface soil moisture observations actually degrades the performance of a land surface model (relative to open-loop assimilations that lack a data assimilation component). Prospects for diagnosing such circumstances and adaptively correcting the culpable model error assumptions using filter innovations are discussed. The dual assimilation of both runoff (from streamflow) and surface soil moisture observations appears to offer a more robust assimilation framework where incorrect model error assumptions are more readily diagnosed via filter innovations.

[1]  W. J. Shuttleworth,et al.  Integration of soil moisture remote sensing and hydrologic modeling using data assimilation , 1998 .

[2]  Niko E. C. Verhoest,et al.  The importance of the spatial patterns of remotely sensed soil moisture in the improvement of discharge predictions for small-scale basins through data assimilation , 2001 .

[3]  Peter Jan van Leeuwen,et al.  An Ensemble Smoother with Error Estimates , 2001 .

[4]  W. Crow,et al.  The assimilation of remotely sensed soil brightness temperature imagery into a land surface model using Ensemble Kalman filtering: a case study based on ESTAR measurements during SGP97 , 2003 .

[5]  D. Dee On-line Estimation of Error Covariance Parameters for Atmospheric Data Assimilation , 1995 .

[6]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  A soil‐vegetation‐atmosphere transfer scheme for modeling spatially variable water and energy balance processes , 1997 .

[7]  Jeffrey P. Walker,et al.  Extended versus Ensemble Kalman Filtering for Land Data Assimilation , 2002 .

[8]  C. Striebel,et al.  On the maximum likelihood estimates for linear dynamic systems , 1965 .

[9]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  A soil‐vegetation‐atmosphere transfer scheme for the modeling of water and energy balance processes in high latitudes: 2. Application and validation , 1999 .

[10]  Dara Entekhabi,et al.  The Hydrosphere State (HYDROS) Mission , 2004 .

[11]  G. Evensen Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi‐geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics , 1994 .

[12]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Comparing different approaches to model error modeling in robust identification , 2002, Autom..

[13]  T. Westerlund,et al.  Remarks on "Asymptotic behavior of the extended Kalman filter as a parameter estimator for linear systems" , 1980 .

[14]  P. Houtekamer,et al.  An Adaptive Ensemble Kalman Filter , 2000 .

[15]  D. Entekhabi,et al.  Land data assimilation and estimation of soil moisture using measurements from the Southern Great Plains 1997 Field Experiment , 2001 .

[16]  W. Crow Correcting Land Surface Model Predictions for the Impact of Temporally Sparse Rainfall Rate Measurements Using an Ensemble Kalman Filter and Surface Brightness Temperature Observations , 2003 .

[17]  Matthias Drusch,et al.  The impact of the SSM/I antenna gain function on land surface parameter retrieval , 1999 .

[18]  J. Famiglietti,et al.  Multiscale modeling of spatially variable water and energy balance processes , 1994 .

[19]  Paul R. Houser,et al.  A methodology for initializing soil moisture in a global climate model: Assimilation of near‐surface soil moisture observations , 2001 .

[20]  Marco Mancini,et al.  Robust simulation of root zone soil moisture with assimilation of surface soil moisture data , 2001 .

[21]  D. L. Brakensiek,et al.  Estimation of Soil Water Properties , 1982 .

[22]  D. McLaughlin,et al.  Hydrologic Data Assimilation with the Ensemble Kalman Filter , 2002 .

[23]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  Global assimilation of satellite surface soil moisture retrievals into the NASA Catchment land surface model , 2005 .

[24]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[25]  G. Evensen,et al.  Analysis Scheme in the Ensemble Kalman Filter , 1998 .

[26]  Jetse D. Kalma,et al.  One-Dimensional Soil Moisture Profile Retrieval by Assimilation of Near-Surface Measurements: A Simplified Soil Moisture Model and Field Application , 2001 .

[27]  G. Evensen,et al.  An ensemble Kalman smoother for nonlinear dynamics , 2000 .

[28]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  Bias reduction in short records of satellite soil moisture , 2004 .

[29]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  A soil‐vegetation‐atmosphere transfer scheme for the modeling of water and energy balance processes in high latitudes: 1. Model improvements , 1999 .

[30]  Yann Kerr,et al.  The hydrosphere State (hydros) Satellite mission: an Earth system pathfinder for global mapping of soil moisture and land freeze/thaw , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.