Mechanisms of Visual Object Recognition in Infancy: Five-Month-Olds Generalize Beyond the Interpolation of Familiar Views.

This work examined predictions of the interpolation of familiar views (IFV) account of object recognition performance in 5-month-olds. Infants were familiarized to an object either from a single viewpoint or from multiple viewpoints varying in rotation around a single axis. Object recognition was then tested in both conditions with the same object rotated around a novel axis. Infants in the multiple-views condition recognized the object, whereas infants in the single-view condition provided no evidence for recognition. Under the same 2 familiarization conditions, infants in a 2nd experiment treated as novel an object that differed in only 1 component from the familiar object. Infants' object recognition is enhanced by experience with multiple views, even when that experience is around an orthogonal axis of rotation, and infants are sensitive to even subtle shape differences between components of similar objects. In general, infants' performance does not accord with the predictions of the IFV model of object recognition. These findings motivate the extension of future research and theory beyond the limits of strictly interpolative mechanisms.

[1]  A. Yonas,et al.  Perception of three-dimensional shape specified by optic flow by 8-week-old infants , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  P. Kellman,et al.  Development of three-dimensional form perception. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  H. Ruff Infant recognition of the invariant form of objects. , 1978, Child development.

[5]  M. Tarr,et al.  Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint dependent , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  S. Pinker,et al.  Visual cognition : An introduction * , 1989 .

[8]  J. Fagan,et al.  Chapter 4 – Early Visual Selectivity: As a Function of Pattern Variables, Previous Exposure, Age from Birth and Conception, and Expected Cognitive Deficit , 1975 .

[9]  R H Day,et al.  Visual shape perception in early infancy. , 1979, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[10]  V. R. Carlson,et al.  Infant perception of the invariant shape of objects varying in slant. , 1979, Child development.

[11]  Gary M. Olson,et al.  The Development of Infant Memory , 1984 .

[12]  A Yonas,et al.  Infants’ sensitivity to kinetic information for three-dimensional object shape , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  Judy S. DeLoache,et al.  Picture perception in infancy , 1979 .

[14]  Michael J. Tarr Is human object recognition better described by geon structural description or by multiple views , 1995 .

[15]  Julie M. Hupp,et al.  Object recognition and attention to object components by preschool children and 4-month-old infants. , 2003, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[16]  C. Mash,et al.  Multidimensional shape similarity in the development of visual object classification. , 2006, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[17]  Marguerite Hoerger,et al.  The perceptual foundations of categorization in infancy , 1996 .

[18]  J. G. Bremner,et al.  Form perception at birth: Cohen and Younger (1984) revisited. , 1991, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[19]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Visual object understanding , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  Brian J. Stankiewicz Just another view , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  M J Tarr,et al.  Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[23]  Irving Biederman,et al.  Learning an object from multiple views enhances its recognition in an orthogonal rotational axis in pigeons , 2002, Vision Research.

[24]  M. Cook,et al.  The perception of solid form in early infancy. , 1978, Child development.

[25]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[26]  P. Kellman Perception of three-dimensional form by human infants , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.