New product myopia

Explores the importance of several regimes of new product development activities using multiple statistical techniques on two different data sets collected in the USA and Canada over 12 years apart. The results were consistent across the statistical methods and across the data sets, but contradict much previous new product research. In particular, it was found that undertaking technical activities proficiently is more important than performing marketing activities proficiently and that performing development stage (including subsequent) activities proficiently is more critical than performing “up‐front” or predevelopment activities proficiently in determining the success or failure of new industrial products.

[1]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Why new industrial products fail , 1975 .

[2]  J. P. Peter Reliability: A Review of Psychometric Basics and Recent Marketing Practices , 1979 .

[3]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  The Dimensions of Industrial New Product Success and Failure , 1979 .

[4]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  A discriminant model for identifying scenarios of industrial new product failure , 1979 .

[5]  R. Sitgreaves Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[6]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings , 1979 .

[7]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Design and marketing of new products , 1980 .

[8]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  The misuse of marketing: An American tragedy , 1981 .

[9]  C. Merle Crawford,et al.  Protocol: New tool for product innovation , 1984 .

[10]  R. Cooper New Product Strategies: What Distinguishes the Top Performers? , 1984 .

[11]  M. Goldstein,et al.  Multivariate Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1984 .

[12]  R. Cooper,et al.  An Investigation into the New Product Process: Steps, Deficiencies, and Impact , 1986 .

[13]  R. Cooper,et al.  New Products: What Separates Winners from Losers? , 1987 .

[14]  Roger Calantone,et al.  An Integrative Model of the New Product Development Process: An Empirical Validation , 1988 .

[15]  R. Cooper,et al.  Resource allocation in the new product process , 1988 .

[16]  R. Calantone,et al.  An Integrative Model of the New Product Development Process , 1988 .

[17]  V. Mahajan,et al.  New Product Development Process: A Perspective for Reexamination , 1988 .

[18]  R. Cooper Predevelopment activities determine new product success , 1988 .

[19]  R. Calantone,et al.  Canonical correlation analysis of unobserved relationships in the new product process , 1990 .

[20]  L. Dwyer,et al.  New product process activities and project outcomes , 1991 .

[21]  A. Sánchez,et al.  Product Innovation Management in Spain , 1991 .

[22]  L. Dwyer,et al.  Organizational Environment, New Product Process Activities, and Project Outcomes , 1991 .

[23]  A. Griffin,et al.  An Interim Report on Measuring Product Development Success and Failure , 1993 .

[24]  A. Page Assessing New Product Development Practices and Performance: Establishing Crucial Norms , 1993 .

[25]  R. Calantone,et al.  Organisational, Technical and Marketing Antecedents for Successful New Product Development , 1993 .

[26]  Ventilation Fails Sensitized Workers , 1993 .

[27]  Mark E. Parry,et al.  The dimensions of industrial new product success and failure in state enterprises in the People's Republic of China , 1994 .