Usefulness of species range polygons for predicting local primate occurrences in southeastern Peru

Species distribution maps are widely used in predicting areas of conservation concern, particularly where species distributions are poorly known. However, the accuracy of range maps for regional/local planning is questionable. We compared published putative geographic range polygons of ten primate species to their actual occupancy at 23 survey sites in southeastern Peru to assess the fine‐scale accuracy of these polygons for regional conservation planning. We analyzed the proportion of sites at which each species was detected, both inside and outside of its published NatureServe [Patterson et al., Digital distribution maps of the mammals of the western hemisphere. Version 1.0. Arlington, VA, 2003] and IUCN [2008; Red List, 2008] range polygons. There were mismatches between our line‐transect survey data and range polygon boundaries for nine of the ten species (from 15 to 80% cases), including both false presences and false absences. Each published dataset overestimated the presence of seven primate species and the absence of four species, though errors varied among species. Occupancy patterns of species with larger geographic ranges were no more accurately predicted than those of more narrow‐range species. Regional barriers to dispersal, such as rivers, and finer‐scale ecological specialization may limit the applicability of range map polygons to regional‐scale conservation priority setting, even for relatively well‐studied taxa. Despite the risk of errors, range polygons are still used as baseline data in conservation planning. We suggest some measures that could reduce the error risk. Am. J. Primatol. 73:53–61, 2011. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  C. Peres,et al.  Priority areas for the conservation of Atlantic forest large mammals , 2009 .

[2]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  The structure and dynamics of geographic ranges , 2003 .

[3]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity , 2004, Nature.

[4]  H. S. Horn,et al.  Measurement of "Overlap" in Comparative Ecological Studies , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[5]  L. Vázquez,et al.  Area selection for conservation of Mexican mammals , 2009, Animal Biodiversity and Conservation.

[6]  R. Kalliola,et al.  River types, site evolution and successional vegetation patterns in Peruvian Amazonia , 1992 .

[7]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Ecological Correlates and Conservation Implications of Overestimating Species Geographic Ranges , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[8]  L. Emmons.  Geographic variation in densities and diversities of non-flying mammals in Amazonia , 1984 .

[9]  H. Buchanan-Smith,et al.  Distribution and Forest Utilization of Saguinus and Other Primates of the Pando Department, Northern Bolivia , 2000, International Journal of Primatology.

[10]  L. Branch.  Seasonal and habitat differences in the abundance of primates in the Amazon (Tapajos) National Park, Brazil , 1983, Primates.

[11]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Conservation Planning and Biodiversity: Assembling the Best Data for the Job , 2004 .

[12]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Game Vertebrate Densities in Hunted and Nonhunted Forest Sites in Manu National Park, Peru , 2010 .

[13]  C. Peres,et al.  Riverine barriers and gene flow in Amazonian saddle-back tamarins. , 1996, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[14]  M. Symington.  Demography, ranging patterns, and activity budgets of black spider monkeys (Ateles paniscus chamek) in the Manu National Park, Peru , 1988, American journal of primatology.

[15]  C. Peres.  General guidelines for standardizing line-transect surveys of tropical forest primates , 1999, Neotropical Primates.

[16]  David M. Stoms,et al.  Choosing surrogates for biodiversity conservation in complex planning environments , 2005 .

[17]  Don E. Wilson,et al.  The Mammal Species of the World , 2009 .

[18]  C. Peres,et al.  Riverine barriers and the geographic distribution of Amazonian species. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  River Boundaries and Species Range Size in Amazonian Primates , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[20]  L. Porter.  Distribution and density of Callimico goeldii in the Department of Pando, Bolivia , 2006, American journal of primatology.

[21]  Josef Kellndorfer,et al.  Remote sensing of floodplain geomorphology as a surrogate for biodiversity in a tropical river system (Madre de Dios, Peru) , 2007 .

[22]  Bruce D. Patterson,et al.  The Status of the World's Land and Marine Mammals: Diversity, Threat, and Knowledge , 2008, Science.

[23]  Bruce D. Patterson,et al.  Mammals of the Manu Biosphere Reserve* , 2006 .

[24]  C. Peres.  Primate community structure at twenty western Amazonian flooded and unflooded forests , 1997, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[25]  A. J. Waltke.  The Sapotaceae of a lowland rainforest: Diversity and distribution in the Los Amigos watershed, Madre de Dios, Peru , 2008 .

[26]  A. Rodríguez,et al.  Ranging pattern and use of space in a group of red howler monkeys (Alouatta seniculus) in a southeastern Colombian rainforest , 2001, American journal of primatology.

[27]  T. Brooks,et al.  Protected Areas and Species , 2004 .

[28]  Ethan P. White,et al.  Disparity between range map- and survey-based analyses of species richness: patterns, processes and implications , 2005 .

[29]  Dawn M. Kaufman,et al.  THE GEOGRAPHIC RANGE: Size, Shape, Boundaries, and Internal Structure , 1996 .

[30]  J. Ragle,et al.  IUCN Red List of Threatened Species , 2010 .

[31]  T. Geissmann,et al.  A primate survey in northern Bolivia, with special reference to Goeldi’s monkey,Callimico goeldii , 1994, International Journal of Primatology.

[32]  Sergi Herrando,et al.  Updating bird species distribution at large spatial scales: applications of habitat modelling to data from long‐term monitoring programs , 2007 .

[33]  A. Fiore.  Ranging behavior and foraging ecology of lowland woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha poeppigii) in Yasuní National Park, Ecuador , 2003, American journal of primatology.

[34]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Species richness, hotspots, and the scale dependence of range maps in ecology and conservation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  L. Emmons.  Primate Communities: Of mice and monkeys: Primates as predictors of mammal community richness , 1999 .

[36]  C. E. Grelle,et al.  Taxon surrogates among Amazonian mammals: Can total species richness be predicted by single orders? , 2009 .

[37]  Ethan P. White,et al.  Ecological correlates of geographical range occupancy in North American birds , 2007 .

[38]  C. Peres,et al.  Primate Communities: Species coexistence, distribution, and environmental determinants of neotropical primate richness: A community-level zoogeographic analysis , 1999 .

[39]  C. Rahbek,et al.  Performance of Sub‐Saharan Vertebrates as Indicator Groups for Identifying Priority Areas for Conservation , 2003 .

[40]  Taylor H. Ricketts,et al.  Beyond Noah: Saving Species Is Not Enough , 2004 .

[41]  P. Hernandez,et al.  Predicting species distributions in poorly-studied landscapes , 2008, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[42]  Neil D. Burgess,et al.  Correlations among species distributions, human density and human infrastructure across the high biodiversity tropical mountains of Africa , 2007 .

[43]  C. Peres.  Structure and spatial organization of an Amazonian terra firme forest primate community , 1993, Journal of Tropical Ecology.