Sustainability Performance Measurement - The Case of Ethiopian Airlines

This paper presents the findings of an investigation of sustainable performance measurement practices at Ethiopian Airlines. Evidence was gathered through structured interviews conducted with key informants of the airline and document reviews. Reports were assessed with respect to sustainable performance measurement system. The paper demonstrates that, despite the availability of economic performance indicators, there are no measurements concerning the social and environmental performance. However there is some operational practice related to social and environmental responsibility of the airline. The research contributes values to two areas: First, it shares some experience in measuring sustainable performance of the airline or their practical involvement in social and environmental responsibility. Second, it tries to help decision makers – based on the example of Ethiopian Airline –to better understand the level of maturity of their sustainable performance measurement and, thus, to improve decision making through a “sustainability lens”.

[1]  John Elkington,et al.  Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business , 1998 .

[2]  G. Brundtland Our Common Future—Call for Action , 1987, Environmental Conservation.

[3]  Mikael Johnsson,et al.  Adoption of Corporate Social Responsibility : A Stakeholder View , 2006 .

[4]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[5]  Chris Laszlo,et al.  The Sustainable Company: How to Create Lasting Value through Social and Environmental Performance , 2003 .

[6]  T. Hardjono,et al.  The Social Dimensions of Business Excellence , 2001 .

[7]  Bo Enquist,et al.  Adoption of corporate social responsibility – incorporating a stakeholder perspective , 2006 .

[8]  J. Elkington Cannibals with Forks , 1997 .

[9]  Jan vom Brocke,et al.  What Is Sustainability in Business Process Management? A Theoretical Framework and Its Application in the Public Sector of Ethiopia , 2010, Business Process Management Workshops.

[10]  Ans Kolk,et al.  Economics of Environmental Management , 1999 .

[11]  M. Clarkson A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance , 1995 .

[12]  Mikael Johnson,et al.  Stakeholder dialogue for sustainable service , 2008 .

[13]  M. Epstein,et al.  Improving Sustainability Performance: Specifying, Implementing and Measuring Key Principles , 2003 .

[14]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .

[15]  Jan Recker,et al.  Enablers and Barriers to the Organizational Adoption of Sustainable Business Practices , 2010, AMCIS.

[16]  Andy Neely,et al.  Perspectives on Performance : The Performance Prism Professor , 2000 .

[17]  Marc J. Epstein,et al.  Making Sustainability Work , 2008 .

[18]  Jan vom Brocke,et al.  Value-oriented Information Systems Design: The Concept of Potentials Modeling and its Application to Service-oriented Architectures , 2009, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[19]  J. Elkington Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development , 1994 .

[20]  S. Schaltegger,et al.  Integrative management of sustainability performance, measurement and reporting , 2006 .

[21]  Sandra Waddock,et al.  Total Responsibility Management: The Manual , 2007 .

[22]  Stefan Schaltegger,et al.  Contemporary Environmental Accounting: Issues, Concepts and Practice , 2000 .

[23]  Vincent di Norcia Environmental and social performance , 1996 .

[24]  P. Bansal The corporate challenges of sustainable development , 2002 .

[25]  Antonio Tencati,et al.  Sustainability and Stakeholder Management: the Need for New Corporate Performance Evaluation and Reporting Systems , 2006 .

[26]  R. S. Kaplan,et al.  Balanced scorecard : strategien erfolgreich umsetzen , 1997 .

[27]  E. Johnsen Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .