An inexpensive and worldwide available digital image analysis technique for histological fibrosis quantification in chronic hepatitis C

Hepatic fibrosis staging is based on semiquantitative scores. Digital imaging analysis (DIA) appears more accurate because fibrosis is quantified in a continuous scale. However, high cost, lack of standardization and worldwide unavailability restrict its use in clinical practice. We developed an inexpensive and widely available DIA technique for fibrosis quantification in hepatitis C, and here, we evaluate its reproducibility and correlation with semiquantitative scores, and determine the fibrosis percentage associated with septal fibrosis and cirrhosis. 282 needle biopsies staged by Ishak and METAVIR scores were included. Images of trichrome‐stained sections were captured and processed using Adobe® Photoshop® CS3 and Adobe® Bridge® softwares. The percentage of fibrosis (fibrosis index) was determined by the ratio between the fibrosis area and the total sample area, expressed in pixels calculated in an automated way. An excellent correlation between DIA fibrosis index and Ishak and METAVIR scores was observed (Spearman's r = 0.95 and 0.92; P < 0.001, respectively). Excellent intra‐observer reproducibility was observed in a randomly chosen subset of 39 biopsies with an intraclass correlation index of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.95–0.99). The best cut‐offs associated with septal fibrosis and cirrhosis were 6% (AUROC 0.97, 95% CI, 0.95–0.99) and 27% (AUROC 1.0, 95% CI, 0.99–1), respectively. This new DIA technique had high correlation with semiquantitative scores in hepatitis C. This method is reproducible, inexpensive and available worldwide allowing its use in clinical practice. The incorporation of DIA technique provides a more complete evaluation of fibrosis adding the quantification to architectural patterns.

[1]  J. Kench,et al.  Which patients with hepatitis C develop liver complications? , 2000, Hepatology.

[2]  R. Standish,et al.  An appraisal of the histopathological assessment of liver fibrosis , 2006, Gut.

[3]  E. Tanaka,et al.  The natural course of chronic hepatitis C: A comparison between patients with genotypes 1 and 2 hepatitis C viruses , 1996, Hepatology.

[4]  P. Bedossa,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of FibroScan and comparison to liver fibrosis biomarkers in chronic viral hepatitis: a multicenter prospective study (the FIBROSTIC study). , 2010, Journal of hepatology.

[5]  P. Bedossa,et al.  Natural history of liver fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C , 1997, The Lancet.

[6]  M Masseroli,et al.  Automatic quantification of liver fibrosis: design and validation of a new image analysis method: comparison with semi-quantitative indexes of fibrosis. , 2000, Journal of hepatology.

[7]  R. Hoda,et al.  Rosai and Ackerman???s Surgical Pathology , 2004 .

[8]  M. Chevallier,et al.  A histological semiquantitative scoring system for evaluation of hepatic fibrosis in needle liver biopsy specimens: Comparison with morphometric studies , 1994, Hepatology.

[9]  R. Becker,et al.  Progression of fibrosis in advanced chronic hepatitis C: Evaluation by morphometric image analysis , 2007, Hepatology.

[10]  M. Ghany,et al.  Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C: An update , 2009, Hepatology.

[11]  Ying Zhang,et al.  Collagen proportionate area of liver tissue determined by digital image analysis in patients with HBV-related decompensated cirrhosis. , 2011, Hepatobiliary & pancreatic diseases international : HBPD INT.

[12]  Hideo Terao,et al.  Regression of liver fibrosis in cases of chronic liver disease type C: quantitative evaluation by using computed image analysis. , 2004, Internal medicine.

[13]  Robert A Levine,et al.  Advances in digital quantification technique enhance discrimination between mild and advanced liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C , 2005, Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver.

[14]  Laurent Castera,et al.  How to assess liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: serum markers or transient elastography vs. liver biopsy? , 2011, Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver.

[15]  B L Kuyatt,et al.  Point counting on the Macintosh. A semiautomated image analysis technique. , 1993, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[16]  M. Kojiro,et al.  Long‐term evolution of fibrosis from chronic hepatitis to cirrhosis in patients with hepatitis C: Morphometric analysis of repeated biopsies , 1997, Hepatology.

[17]  D Chappard,et al.  Histopathological evaluation of liver fibrosis: quantitative image analysis vs semi-quantitative scores. Comparison with serum markers. , 1998, Journal of hepatology.

[18]  A. Widell,et al.  The importance of cofactors in the histologic progression of minimal and mild chronic hepatitis C. , 2008, Liver.

[19]  F. Degos,et al.  Practices of Liver Biopsy in France: Results of a Prospective Nationwide Survey , 2000, Hepatology.

[20]  F Krummenauer,et al.  Quantification of Video‐Taped Images in Microcirculation Research Using Inexpensive Imaging Software (Adobe Photoshop) , 2000, Microcirculation.

[21]  M. O'brien,et al.  An assessment of digital image analysis to measure fibrosis in liver biopsy specimens of patients with chronic hepatitis C. , 2000, American journal of clinical pathology.

[22]  Julien Vergniol,et al.  Noninvasive tests for fibrosis and liver stiffness predict 5-year outcomes of patients with chronic hepatitis C. , 2011, Gastroenterology.

[23]  Gamal M Dahab,et al.  Digital quantification of fibrosis in liver biopsy sections: Description of a new method by Photoshop software , 2004, Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology.

[24]  Y. Ngo,et al.  A prospective analysis of the prognostic value of biomarkers (FibroTest) in patients with chronic hepatitis C. , 2006, Clinical chemistry.

[25]  P. Bedossa,et al.  Intraobserver and Interobserver Variations in Liver Biopsy Interpretation in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C , 1994 .

[26]  P. Scheuer Liver biopsy size matters in chronic hepatitis: Bigger is better , 2003, Hepatology.

[27]  K. Ishak,et al.  Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis. , 1995 .

[28]  H. Thomas,et al.  Quantitative versus morphological assessment of liver fibrosis: semi‐quantitative scores are more robust than digital image fibrosis area estimation , 2003, Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver.

[29]  X. Causse,et al.  Interferon‐α2b therapy reduces liver fibrosis in chronic non‐A, non‐B hepatitis: A quantitative histological evaluation , 1993, Hepatology.

[30]  Alberto M Marchevsky,et al.  Virtual microscopy as a tool for proficiency testing in cytopathology: a model using multiple digital images of Papanicolaou tests. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.