The Neural Bases of Social Intention Understanding: The Role of Interaction Goals

Decoding others' intentions is a crucial aspect of social cognition. Neuroimaging studies suggest that inferring immediate goals engages the neural system for action understanding (i.e. mirror system), while the decoding of long-term intentions requires the system subserving the attribution of mental states (i.e. mentalizing). A controversial issue, stimulated by recent inconsistent results, concerns whether the two systems are concurrently vs. exclusively involved in intention understanding. This issue is particularly relevant in the case of social interactions, whose processing has been mostly, but not uncontroversially, associated with the mentalizing system. We tested the alternative hypothesis that the relative contribution of the two systems in intention understanding may also depend on the shared goal of interacting agents. To this purpose, 27 participants observed social interactions differing in their cooperative vs. affective shared goal during functional-Magnetic-Resonance-Imaging. The processing of both types of interactions activated the right temporo-parietal junction involved in mentalizing on action goals. Additionally, whole-brain and regions-of-interest analyses showed that the action understanding system (inferior prefrontal-parietal cortex) was more strongly activated by cooperative interactions, while the mentalizing-proper system (medial prefrontal cortex) was more strongly engaged by affective interactions. These differences were modulated by individual differences in empathizing. Both systems can thus be involved in understanding social intentions, with a relative weighting depending on the specific shared goal of the interaction.

[1]  Roel M. Willems,et al.  Complementary Systems for Understanding Action Intentions , 2008, Current Biology.

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  How Many Subjects Constitute a Study? , 1999, NeuroImage.

[3]  Stefano F. Cappa,et al.  Neural Coding of Cooperative vs. Affective Human Interactions: 150 ms to Code the Action's Purpose , 2011, PloS one.

[4]  Emery N. Brown,et al.  Distinct Regions of Right Temporo-Parietal Junction Are Selective for Theory of Mind and Exogenous Attention , 2009, PloS one.

[5]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  D. Tantam,et al.  Recognition and treatment of Asperger syndrome in the community. , 2008, British medical bulletin.

[7]  C. Frith,et al.  Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[8]  Rebecca C. Knickmeyer,et al.  Sex Differences in the Brain: Implications for Explaining Autism , 2005, Science.

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Classical and Bayesian Inference in Neuroimaging: Applications , 2002, NeuroImage.

[10]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  The influence of spatial context and the role of intentionality in the interpretation of animacy from motion , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  R Saxe,et al.  People thinking about thinking people The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind” , 2003, NeuroImage.

[12]  D. Collins,et al.  Automatic 3D Intersubject Registration of MR Volumetric Data in Standardized Talairach Space , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[13]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[14]  Rebecca Elliott,et al.  Neuronal correlates of theory of mind and empathy: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study in a nonverbal task , 2006, NeuroImage.

[15]  Günther Knoblich,et al.  Favouritism in the motor system: social interaction modulates action simulation , 2010, Biology Letters.

[16]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Active during Visual Perception of Biological Motion , 2002, Neuron.

[17]  Istvan Molnar-Szakacs,et al.  Watching social interactions produces dorsomedial prefrontal and medial parietal BOLD fMRI signal increases compared to a resting baseline , 2004, NeuroImage.

[18]  S. Krach,et al.  Are women better mindreaders? Sex differences in neural correlates of mentalizing detected with functional MRI , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[19]  Josef Perner,et al.  Temporo-parietal Junction Activity in Theory-of-Mind Tasks: Falseness, Beliefs, or Attention , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Henrik Walter,et al.  Understanding Intentions in Social Interaction: The Role of the Anterior Paracingulate Cortex , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  C. Frith,et al.  Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  F. Van Overwalle Social cognition and the brain: A meta‐analysis , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[23]  H. Walter,et al.  The intentional network: How the brain reads varieties of intentions , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  A M Dale,et al.  Optimal experimental design for event‐related fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[25]  Frank Van Overwalle,et al.  Understanding others' actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: A meta-analysis , 2009, NeuroImage.

[26]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neural Circuits Involved in the Recognition of Actions Performed by Nonconspecifics: An fMRI Study , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  Werner Lutzenberger,et al.  Social interaction revealed by motion: dynamics of neuromagnetic gamma activity. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  U. Frith,et al.  Do triangles play tricks? Attribution of mental states to animated shapes in normal and abnormal development , 2000 .

[29]  A. Proverbio,et al.  Gender differences in hemispheric asymmetry for face processing , 2006, BMC Neuroscience.

[30]  Ran R. Hassin,et al.  Automatic goal inferences. , 2005 .

[31]  J. Decety,et al.  Gender Differences in the Mu Rhythm of the Human Mirror-Neuron System , 2008, PloS one.

[32]  D. Perrett,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.8 No.11 November 2004 Demystifying social cognition: a Hebbian perspective , 2022 .

[33]  S. Frangou,et al.  Autism Spectrum Disorders and Schizophrenia: Meta-Analysis of the Neural Correlates of Social Cognition , 2011, PloS one.

[34]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action recognition in the premotor cortex. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[35]  Jean-Luc Anton,et al.  Recruitment of Both the Mirror and the Mentalizing Networks When Observing Social Interactions Depicted by Point-Lights: A Neuroimaging Study , 2011, PloS one.

[36]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[37]  O. Tzeng,et al.  Sex differences in the neuroanatomy of human mirror-neuron system: A voxel-based morphometric investigation , 2009, Neuroscience.

[38]  R. E Passingham,et al.  Activations related to “mirror” and “canonical” neurones in the human brain: an fMRI study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[39]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[40]  Jennifer H. Pfeifer,et al.  Understanding emotions in others: mirror neuron dysfunction in children with autism spectrum disorders , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  J. Decety,et al.  A PET Investigation of the Attribution of Intentions with a Nonverbal Task , 2000, NeuroImage.

[42]  Beate Sodian,et al.  Functional activity of the right temporo-parietal junction and of the medial prefrontal cortex associated with true and false belief reasoning , 2012, NeuroImage.

[43]  R. Adorni,et al.  Neural markers of a greater female responsiveness to social stimuli , 2008, BMC Neuroscience.

[44]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modelling Geometric Deformations in Epi Time Series , 2022 .

[45]  Jen-Chuen Hsieh,et al.  Gender differences in the human mirror system: a magnetoencephalography study , 2006, Neuroreport.

[46]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Goal Representation in Human Anterior Intraparietal Sulcus , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  A. Mehrabian,et al.  A measure of emotional empathy. , 1972, Journal of personality.

[48]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again , 1995, NeuroImage.

[49]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Parietal Lobe: From Action Organization to Intention Understanding , 2005, Science.

[51]  U. Frith,et al.  Mindblind Eyes: An Absence of Spontaneous Theory of Mind in Asperger Syndrome , 2009, Science.

[52]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic , 2005, NeuroImage.

[53]  Dylan D Wagner,et al.  Individual Differences in the Spontaneous Recruitment of Brain Regions Supporting Mental State Understanding When Viewing Natural Social Scenes , 2011 .

[54]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[55]  Jason P. Mitchell Activity in right temporo-parietal junction is not selective for theory-of-mind. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[56]  A. M. Meneghini,et al.  Adattamento e validazione su campione italiano della balanced emotional empathy scale di a. mehrabian , 2004 .

[57]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Grasping the Intentions of Others with One's Own Mirror Neuron System , 2005, PLoS biology.

[58]  Uta Frith,et al.  Theory of mind , 2001, Current Biology.

[59]  Alice Mado Proverbio,et al.  Sex differences in the brain response to affective scenes with or without humans , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[60]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Empathy for Pain Involves the Affective but not Sensory Components of Pain , 2004, Science.

[61]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others , 2006, Nature.

[62]  Nadim Joni Shah,et al.  Gender differences in brain networks supporting empathy , 2008, NeuroImage.