Familial database search on two-person mixture

This work presents how the familial database search can be applied to forensic investigations in which the DNA evidence is a mixture. The forensic identification is based on a ranked list of the likelihood ratios for each candidate in the DNA database of being the relative of the contributor of the forensic sample. A simulation study using Hong Kong Chinese data demonstrated the comparable effectiveness of our approach that in 90% of the cases, the sibling of the contributor can be found in the top 50 profiles, and the parent/child can be found in the top 10 profiles. We also discuss the prediction on the performance of the search that can guide the decision of the police force to initiate the investigation.

[1]  Sen. M.I.,et al.  Statistical Science in the Courtroom , 2001 .

[2]  J M Curran,et al.  Interpreting DNA mixtures in structured populations. , 1999, Journal of forensic sciences.

[3]  David Lazer,et al.  Finding Criminals Through DNA of Their Relatives , 2006, Science.

[4]  D N Stivers,et al.  The utility of short tandem repeat loci beyond human identification: Implications for development of new DNA typing systems , 1999, Electrophoresis.

[5]  W. Fung,et al.  Power of exclusion revisited: probability of excluding relatives of the true father from paternity , 2002, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[6]  J Buckleton,et al.  Use of DNA profiles for investigation using a simulated national DNA database: Part I. Partial SGM Plus profiles. , 2010, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[7]  Wing K. Fung,et al.  Evaluation of DNA mixtures involving two pairs of relatives , 2004, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[8]  James M Curran,et al.  Effectiveness of familial searches. , 2008, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[9]  Peter Donnelly,et al.  Inference in Forensic Identification , 1995 .

[10]  W. Fung,et al.  Interpreting DNA mixtures with the presence of relatives , 2003, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[11]  Simon Cowen,et al.  A likelihood ratio approach to familial searching of large DNA databases , 2008 .

[12]  R. Meester,et al.  The Evidential Value in the DNA Database Search Controversy and the Two‐Stain Problem , 2003, Biometrics.

[13]  Yue-Qing Hu,et al.  Evaluation of DNA mixtures from database search. , 2010, Biometrics.

[14]  N. Fukshansky,et al.  Interpreting forensic DNA evidence on the basis of hypotheses testing , 1998, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[15]  N. Fukshansky,et al.  Biostatistics for mixed stains: the case of tested relatives of a non-tested suspect , 2000, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[16]  A. Jeffreys,et al.  Individual-specific ‘fingerprints’ of human DNA , 1985, Nature.

[17]  T. Reid,et al.  Use of sibling pairs to determine the familial searching efficiency of forensic databases. , 2008, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[18]  B. Weir,et al.  Interpreting DNA mixtures. , 1997, Journal of forensic sciences.

[19]  Wing K. Fung,et al.  Interpreting forensic DNA mixtures: allowing for uncertainty in population substructure and dependence , 2000 .

[20]  J. W. Lee,et al.  Evaluation of DNA match probability in criminal case. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[21]  Fabio Corradi,et al.  Forensic identification of relatives of individuals included in a database of DNA profiles , 2006 .

[22]  W. K. Fung,et al.  Population data for the Identifier 15 STR loci in Hong Kong Chinese. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[23]  A Stockmarr,et al.  Likelihood Ratios for Evaluating DNA Evidence When the Suspect is Found Through a Database Search , 1999, Biometrics.