The above bit string encodes personal information about one of the authors of this essay. Of course, without rules to decode the bit string, it is impossible to say whether it is genetic information, weight, age, fingerprint, religion, etc. Layered on top of that technical decoding process is a social decoding process – how sensitive is this information? How useful is it to the government for various purposes? The objective of this paper is to offer some key lessons for the regulation of genetic information collected by the state for law enforcement purposes. In the first part of the paper, we discuss two fundamental principles of informational privacy theory. Utilizing these, we then examine the statutory regimes that have emerged for the regulation of the information that the government collects in three different domains – fingerprints, department of motor vehicle (DMV) records, and tax records. In the third and final part we use the results of our analysis as analogies for similar regulatory challenges in the regulation of genetic information collected for law enforcement purposes, and make some tentative recommendations.
[1]
A. Westin,et al.
The assault on privacy
,
1971
.
[2]
Paul M. Schwartz,et al.
Privacy and Participation: Personal Information and Public Sector Regulation in the United States
,
1994
.
[3]
Bill Loving.
DMV Secrecy: Stalking and Suppression of Speech Rights
,
1996
.
[4]
Viktor Mayer-Schönberger,et al.
Generational development of data protection in Europe
,
1997
.
[5]
Joseph J. Darby.
Confidentiality and the Law of Taxation
,
1998
.
[6]
Margo J. Anderson.
The Dark Side of Numbers: The Role of Population Data Systems in Human
,
2001
.
[7]
Robin T W Williams,et al.
Inclusiveness, Effectiveness and Intrusiveness: Issues in the Developing Uses of DNA Profiling in Support of Criminal Investigations
,
2006,
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.