Internationalization of Construction Service Corporations: Impact of Size and International Experience

The international services literature lacks research investigating the association between corporate size and corporate international experience with the internationalization. Using an integrated theoretical approach, this paper examines the internationalization of construction service corporations (CSCs) with specific emphasis on four dimensions: motives, firm-specific competitive advantages, home country-specific competitive advantages and locational considerations. A quantitative approach was adopted through a postal questionnaire survey. Out of 126 CSCS, 84 usable responses were analyzed giving 66.7% response rate. A comparative analysis was conducted using Mann-Whitney U test between the corporations having different sizes and international experiences. The findings show that CSCs of varied sizes did not concur over several firm-specific competitive advantages and home country-specific competitive advantages, whereas CSCs of varied international experiences were in disagreement over some locational factors. Small CSCs need to form joint ventures or partnerships in order to overcome their limitations. The government support is direly needed to promote internationalization of CSCs especially the younger and smaller ones which stand more vulnerable due to lack of opportunities in their domestic markets. The study will be helpful to managers and regulatory bodies towards creating a balanced playing field to develop the internationalization process for their service corporations.

[1]  S. Han,et al.  Empirical Analysis of Host-Country Effects in the International Construction Market: An Industry-Level Approach , 2016 .

[2]  Irem Dikmen,et al.  Capturing Knowledge in Construction Projects: Knowledge Platform for Contractors , 2008 .

[3]  Øystein D. Fjeldstad,et al.  Transaction services and SME internationalization: The effect of home and host country bank relationships on international investment and growth , 2017 .

[4]  Amelia Clarke,et al.  Outcomes to Partners in Multi-Stakeholder Cross-Sector Partnerships: A Resource-Based View , 2019 .

[5]  Philemon Oyewole.  International Marketing of Services and Developing Countries , 2018 .

[6]  Xiaoling Zhang,et al.  Agglomeration and competitive position of contractors in the international construction sector , 2017 .

[7]  Bryan Hubbard,et al.  Multinational contracting and the eclectic paradigm of internationalization , 2018, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.

[8]  Bilal Afsar,et al.  Intrinsic psychosocial stressors and construction worker productivity: impact of employee age and industry experience , 2018 .

[9]  J. Dunning.  Trade, Location of Economic Activity and the MNE: A Search for an Eclectic Approach , 1977 .

[10]  R. Ramamurti,et al.  Impact of the Home Country on Internationalization , 2018, Journal of World Business.

[11]  Nuria Calvo,et al.  Internationalization as process of value distribution through innovation: polyhedral diagnosis of a “born global” firm , 2019, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing.

[12]  Özlem Öz.  The Competitive Advantage of Nations: The Case of Turkey , 2019 .

[13]  Hildy Teegen,et al.  Export Strategies and Performance of Firms from Emerging Economies: Evidence from Brazil, Chile, and Mexico , 2000 .

[14]  P. Ghauri,et al.  Internationalization of Service Firms and Their Interactions with Socio-Political Actors , 2019, Management International Review.

[15]  M. Awais,et al.  Internationalization Process of Pakistani Contractors: An Exploratory Study , 2013 .

[16]  D. Dikova,et al.  Investment motives, ownership advantages and institutional distance: An examination of Russian cross-border acquisitions , 2019, International Business Review.

[17]  Serdar Ulubeyli,et al.  Strategic Management Practices in Turkish Construction Firms , 2009 .

[18]  R. Narula,et al.  Internationalization Motives: Sell More, Buy Better, Upgrade and Escape , 2015 .

[19]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  Luis Antonio Dib,et al.  Propensity for Internationalization: A Study of Brazilian Software Firms , 2015 .

[21]  M. Wright,et al.  Export propensity and intensity of subsidiaries in emerging economies , 2008 .

[22]  N. Ndubisi,et al.  Mindfulness, reliability, pre-emptive conflict handling, customer orientation and outcomes in Malaysia's healthcare sector , 2012 .

[23]  I. Alon,et al.  Dynamic Embeddedness in Chinese Firm Internationalization , 2017 .

[24]  James E. Sallis,et al.  Choice of Foreign Market Entry Mode in Service Firms , 2006 .

[25]  J. Alegre,et al.  Analysing the link between export intensity, innovation and firm size in a science-based industry , 2007 .

[26]  R. Rasiah,et al.  Home government policies for outward FDI from emerging economies: lessons from Asia , 2010 .

[27]  R. Vernon.  International investment and international trade in the product cycle , 1966 .

[28]  Noemi Sinkovics,et al.  The effect of matching on perceived export barriers and performance in an era of globalization discontents: Empirical evidence from UK SMEs , 2018, International Business Review.

[29]  Bernhard Swoboda,et al.  Competitive strategies in retailing—an investigation of the applicability of Porter's framework for food retailers , 2006 .

[30]  M. T. Fleury,et al.  Ownership in cross-border acquisitions and the role of government support , 2017 .

[31]  Giorgio Ricchiuti,et al.  Size, innovation and internationalization: a survival analysis of Italian firms , 2011 .

[32]  Abdul-Rashid Abdul-Aziz,et al.  Internationalization of Construction-Related Consultants: Impact of Age and Size , 2013 .

[33]  Shige Makino,et al.  Multinational corporation internationalization in the service sector: a study of Japanese trading companies , 2007 .

[34]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  The Competitive Advantage of Nations. , 1990 .

[35]  Zafar U. Ahmed,et al.  International risk perceptions and mode of entry: a case study of Malaysian multinational firms , 2002 .

[36]  M. Falch,et al.  Internationalization of e-Government Services , 2018, 2018 11th CMI International Conference: Prospects and Challenges Towards Developing a Digital Economy within the EU.

[37]  D. Griffith,et al.  An empirical examination of factors influencing the internationalization of service firms , 2003 .

[38]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[39]  F. Borini,et al.  Managerial Perceptions of Barriers to Internationalization: An Examination of Brazil's New Technology-Based Firms , 2014 .

[40]  Christoph Grimpe,et al.  Who instigates university–industry collaborations? University scientists versus firm employees , 2017 .

[41]  Abdul-Rashid Abdul-Aziz,et al.  Business networks and internationalisation of contractors from developing countries , 2011 .

[42]  David Arditi,et al.  Performance of International Joint Ventures in Construction , 2010 .

[43]  J. Menzies,et al.  Outward Foreign Direct Investment from Emerging Countries: Theoretical Extension and Evidence from China , 2017 .

[44]  Tina C. Ambos,et al.  Distance and Perceptions of Risk in Internationalization Decisions , 2015 .

[45]  Qiming Li,et al.  Developing Competitive Advantages in Political Risk Management for International Construction Enterprises , 2014 .

[46]  K. Ranjan,et al.  An Effectual–Causal View of Managerial Decisions in the Internationalization of Indian MNEs , 2019, Journal of International Management.

[47]  Wooyong Jung,et al.  Empirical Assessment of Internationalization Strategies for Small and Medium Construction Companies , 2010 .

[48]  K. Deans,et al.  Small Firms in Regional Clusters: Local Networks and Internationalization in the Southern Hemisphere , 2019, Journal of Small Business Management.

[49]  J. Zuo,et al.  Situation and Competitiveness of Foreign Project Management Consultancy Enterprises in China , 2011 .

[50]  Evelyn Ai Lin Teo,et al.  Empirical Investigation into Factors Affecting Exporting Construction Services in SMEs in Singapore , 2007 .

[51]  John Messner,et al.  Competitive Positioning and Continuity of Construction Firms in International Markets , 2008 .

[52]  Low Sui Pheng,et al.  Ownership advantages/disadvantages of Singapore transnational construction corporations , 2003 .

[53]  P. P. McDougall,et al.  Toward a theory of international new ventures , 1994 .

[54]  Justin Paul,et al.  A review of research on outward foreign direct investment from emerging countries, including China: what do we know, how do we know and where should we be heading? , 2018 .

[55]  R. Edwards,et al.  How Smaller Born-Global Firms Use Networks and Alliances to Overcome Constraints to Rapid Internationalization , 2006 .

[56]  Dante Di Gregorio,et al.  International new ventures: The cross-border nexus of individuals and opportunities , 2008 .

[57]  Anna Lejpras.  Determinants of export performance: differences between service and manufacturing SMEs , 2019 .

[58]  Rui Torres de Oliveira,et al.  International Expansion of Chinese Emerging Market Multinational Corporations to Developed Markets: A Qualitative Analysis of Post-acquisition and Integration Strategies , 2018, Chinese Acquisitions in Developed Countries.

[59]  Arto Ojala,et al.  Market entry and priority of small and medium-sized enterprises in the software industry: An empirical analysis of cultural distance, geographical distance, and market size , 2011 .

[60]  Howard Seymour.  The Multinational Construction Industry , 1987 .

[61]  Muhammad Jamaluddin Thaheem,et al.  Critical External Risks in International Joint Ventures for Construction Industry in Pakistan , 2018 .

[62]  Igor Martek,et al.  International Market Selection Model for Large Chinese Contractors , 2016 .

[63]  Muhammad Jamaluddin Thaheem,et al.  Influence of Perceived Fairness on Contractors’ Potential to Dispute: Moderating Effect of Engineering Ethics , 2020 .

[64]  Mário Raposo,et al.  SME internationalization research: Mapping the state of the art , 2018 .