Perceived Value and Technology Adoption Across Four End User Groups

This chapter explores the role end user perceptions in information technology adoption from the perspective of innovation diffusion theory. It is based on empirical data from a three-year longitudinal study of an information system implementation in an engineering organization. Data were collected on six different applications and their adoption by four categories of end users: engineering managers, project engineers, professionals, and secretaries. The data indicate a substantial variance across time, user categories, and applications in terms of adoption rates and perceptions of technology. The managerial implications of the results are that differentiated implementation strategies focused on specific end user categories are likely to be more successful than a single broadbrush strategy for all users. The results also suggest a framework for predicting technology adoption in the long run, based on initial adoption rates and user perceptions of technology.

[1]  Fred L. Collopy,et al.  Biases in retrospective self-reports of time use: an empirical study of computer users , 1996 .

[2]  Sue A. Conger,et al.  INNOVATIONS : A CLASSIFICATION BY IT LOCUS OF IMPACT AND RESEARCH APPROACH , 2002 .

[3]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Technological Innovation in American Local Governments: The Case of Computing , 1980 .

[4]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[5]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Change Agentry - The Next IS Frontier , 1996, MIS Q..

[6]  J. C. Brancheau,et al.  The diffusion of information technology: testing and extending innovation diffusion theory in the context of end-user computing , 1987 .

[7]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  Successful IS innovation: the contingent contributions of innovation characteristics and implementation process , 1999, J. Inf. Technol..

[8]  Malcolm Munro,et al.  Information Technology Assessment and Adoption: A Field Study , 1985, MIS Q..

[9]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology , 1988 .

[10]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[11]  George William Kent Moore,et al.  End user computing and office automation: a diffusion of innovations perspective , 1987 .

[12]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  The Adoption of Spreadsheet Software: Testing Innovation Diffusion Theory in the Context of End-User Computing , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  T. Bikson,et al.  Factors in Successful Implementation of Computer-Based Office Information Systems: , 1985 .

[14]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Information systems and organizational change , 1990, CACM.

[15]  T. J. Larsen,et al.  Technology diffusion and organizational transformation : An integrative framework , 1998 .

[16]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1992 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION : A REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH , 2017 .

[17]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication System Network Data: Theoretical Concerns and Empirical Examples , 1990, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[18]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[19]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Why information systems fail , 1975 .

[21]  E. B. Swanson,et al.  Information systems innovation among organizations , 1994 .

[22]  G. Dickson,et al.  Organizational Characteristics and Information Systems: An Exploratory Investigation , 1982 .

[23]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[24]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  If we build it, they will come: Designing information systems that people want to use , 1994 .

[25]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology , 1995, MIS Q..

[26]  Eric G. Moore,et al.  Profiling technology diffusion categories: Empirical test of two models , 1994 .