SISS-Geo: Leveraging Citizen Science to Monitor Wildlife Health Risks in Brazil

The well-being of human and wildlife health involves many challenges, such as monitoring the movement of pathogens; expanding health surveillance; collecting data and extracting information to identify and predict risks; integrating specialists from different areas to handle data, species and distinct social and environmental contexts; and the commitment to bringing relevant information to society. In Brazil, there is still the difficulty of building a system that is not impaired by its large territorial extension and its poorly integrated sectoral policies. The Brazilian Wildlife Health Information System, SISS-Geo (SISS-Geo is the abbreviation of “Sistema de Informacao em Saude Silvestre Georreferenciado” (which translates to “Georeferenced Wildlife Health Information System”) and can be accessed at http://www.biodiversidade.ciss.fiocruz.br or http://sissgeo.lncc.br (in Portuguese)), is a platform for collaborative monitoring that intends to overcome the challenges in wildlife health. It aims at the integration and participation of various segments of society, encompassing the registration of animals occurrences by citizen scientists; the reliable diagnosis of pathogens from the laboratory and expert networks; and computational and mathematical challenges in analytical and predictive systems, model interpretation, data integration and visualization, and geographic information systems. It has been successfully applied to support decision-making on recent wildlife health events, such as a Yellow Fever epizootic.

[1]  Peter Daszak,et al.  One Health, emerging infectious diseases and wildlife: two decades of progress? , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  Luiz M. R. Gadelha,et al.  Model-R: A Framework for Scalable and Reproducible Ecological Niche Modeling , 2017, CARLA.

[3]  Marie-Pierre Ryser-Degiorgis,et al.  Wildlife health investigations: needs, challenges and recommendations , 2013, BMC Veterinary Research.

[4]  N. Sillero What does ecological modelling model? A proposed classification of ecological niche models based on their underlying methods , 2011 .

[5]  R. Ostfeld,et al.  Spatial epidemiology: an emerging (or re-emerging) discipline. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[6]  Matthew B Jones,et al.  Ecoinformatics: supporting ecology as a data-intensive science. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  Marta Mattoso,et al.  BioWorkbench: a high-performance framework for managing and analyzing bioinformatics experiments , 2018, PeerJ.

[8]  R. Ostfeld,et al.  Effects of environmental change on zoonotic disease risk: an ecological primer. , 2014, Trends in parasitology.

[9]  Zhi Zhang,et al.  Visual Informatics Tools for Supporting Large-Scale Collaborative Wildlife Monitoring with Citizen Scientists , 2016, IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine.

[10]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Essential Biodiversity Variables , 2013, Science.

[11]  A. Peterson Mapping Disease Transmission Risk: Enriching Models Using Biogeography and Ecology , 2014 .

[12]  Alex Hardisty,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) A decadal view of biodiversity informatics : challenges and priorities , 2013 .

[13]  J. Edwards Research and Societal Benefits of the Global Biodiversity Information Facility , 2004 .

[14]  M. Nahrendorf,et al.  Neutrophil-macrophage communication in inflammation and atherosclerosis , 2015, Science.

[15]  John Wieczorek,et al.  Darwin Core: An Evolving Community-Developed Biodiversity Data Standard , 2012, PloS one.

[16]  R. Ostfeld,et al.  Effects of species diversity on disease risk. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[17]  Felicia Keesing,et al.  Is biodiversity good for your health? , 2015, Science.

[18]  Burr Settles,et al.  Active Learning Literature Survey , 2009 .

[19]  John R. Koza,et al.  Genetic programming - on the programming of computers by means of natural selection , 1993, Complex adaptive systems.

[20]  Matthew Jones,et al.  Maximizing the Value of Ecological Data with Structured Metadata: An Introduction to Ecological Metadata Language (EML) and Principles for Metadata Creation , 2005 .

[21]  Kate E. Jones,et al.  Global trends in emerging infectious diseases , 2008, Nature.

[22]  R. Lourenço-de-Oliveira,et al.  Potential risk of re-emergence of urban transmission of Yellow Fever virus in Brazil facilitated by competent Aedes populations , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[23]  Marta Mattoso,et al.  BaMBa: towards the integrated management of Brazilian marine environmental data , 2015, Database J. Biol. Databases Curation.

[24]  Masoud Nikravesh,et al.  Feature Extraction - Foundations and Applications , 2006, Feature Extraction.

[25]  M. Fischer,et al.  Higher plant diversity promotes higher diversity of fungal pathogens, while it decreases pathogen infection per plant. , 2014, Ecology.

[26]  J. M. Heberling,et al.  iNaturalist as a tool to expand the research value of museum specimens , 2018, Applications in plant sciences.

[27]  Clémentine Calba,et al.  Hunters’ acceptability of the surveillance system and alternative surveillance strategies for classical swine fever in wild boar - a participatory approach , 2016, BMC Veterinary Research.

[28]  R. Ostfeld,et al.  Biodiversity and Disease Risk: the Case of Lyme Disease , 2000 .

[29]  Jorge Soberón,et al.  A global perspective on decadal challenges and priorities in biodiversity informatics , 2015, BMC Ecology.

[30]  R. MacLean,et al.  High parasite diversity accelerates host adaptation and diversification , 2018, Science.

[31]  Jeremy M. Cohen,et al.  Biodiversity inhibits parasites: Broad evidence for the dilution effect , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Lior Rokach,et al.  Ensemble-based classifiers , 2010, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[33]  Daniel Rivero,et al.  Automatic feature extraction using genetic programming: An application to epileptic EEG classification , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[34]  Alban Gaignard,et al.  Scientific workflows for computational reproducibility in the life sciences: Status, challenges and opportunities , 2017, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[35]  Maya Wardeh,et al.  Database of host-pathogen and related species interactions, and their global distribution , 2015, Scientific Data.

[36]  Francisco Pando How species interactions are managed in Plinian Core: Status and questions , 2017 .

[37]  Alexander Zien,et al.  Semi-Supervised Learning , 2006 .

[38]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  The eBird enterprise: An integrated approach to development and application of citizen science , 2014 .

[39]  Robert Poulin,et al.  Network analysis shining light on parasite ecology and diversity. , 2010, Trends in parasitology.

[40]  Javier Otegui,et al.  The GBIF Integrated Publishing Toolkit: Facilitating the Efficient Publishing of Biodiversity Data on the Internet , 2014, PloS one.

[41]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  Parasites in food webs: the ultimate missing links , 2008, Ecology letters.

[42]  R. Sutherst,et al.  The vulnerability of animal and human health to parasites under global change. , 2001, International journal for parasitology.

[43]  Matthew J. Turk,et al.  Computing Environments for Reproducibility: Capturing the "Whole Tale" , 2018, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[44]  William B. Karesh,et al.  Connecting global priorities: biodiversity and human health: a state of knowledge review. , 2015 .

[45]  J. Drexler,et al.  Evidence for multiple sylvatic transmission cycles during the 2016-2017 yellow fever virus outbreak, Brazil. , 2018, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[46]  F. C. VasconcelosPedro,et al.  Yellow Fever Remains a Potential Threat to Public Health. , 2016 .

[47]  A. L. R. Roque,et al.  Lower Richness of Small Wild Mammal Species and Chagas Disease Risk , 2012, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.