Does transcranial electrical stimulation enhance corticospinal excitability of the motor cortex in healthy individuals? A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Numerous studies have explored the effects of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) – including anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a‐tDCS), cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (c‐tDCS), transcranial alternative current stimulation (tACS), transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) and transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS) – on corticospinal excitability (CSE) in healthy populations. However, the efficacy of these techniques and their optimal parameters for producing robust results has not been studied. Thus, the aim of this systematic review was to consolidate current knowledge about the effects of various parameters of a‐tDCS, c‐tDCS, tACS, tRNS and tPCS on the CSE of the primary motor cortex (M1) in healthy people. Leading electronic databases were searched for relevant studies published between January 1990 and February 2017; 126 articles were identified, and their results were extracted and analysed using RevMan software. The meta‐analysis showed that a‐tDCS application on the dominant side significantly increases CSE (P < 0.01) and that the efficacy of a‐tDCS is dependent on current density and duration of application. Similar results were obtained for stimulation of M1 on the non‐dominant side (P = 0.003). The effects of a‐tDCS reduce significantly after 24 h (P = 0.006). Meta‐analysis also revealed significant reduction in CSE following c‐tDCS (P < 0.001) and significant increases after tRNS (P = 0.03) and tPCS (P = 0.01). However, tACS effects on CSE were only significant when the stimulation frequency was ≥140 Hz. This review provides evidence that tES has substantial effects on CSE in healthy individuals for a range of stimulus parameters.

[1]  A. de Rugy,et al.  Different mechanisms contributing to savings and anterograde interference are impaired in Parkinson's disease , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[2]  Phillip Wolff,et al.  Causal reasoning with forces , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[3]  Hugo Théoret,et al.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation modulates GABAB-related intracortical inhibition in the M1 of healthy individuals , 2013, Neuroreport.

[4]  Paul Sauseng,et al.  The Importance of Sample Size for Reproducibility of tDCS Effects , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[5]  Georgina M. Jackson,et al.  Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2016, Brain Stimulation.

[6]  Colleen K. Loo,et al.  Inter- and Intra-individual Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) at Varying Current Intensities , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[7]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Nonlinear Dose-Dependent Impact of D1 Receptor Activation on Motor Cortex Plasticity in Humans , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  M. Ridding,et al.  Increased cortical excitability induced by transcranial DC and peripheral nerve stimulation , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[9]  A. Antal,et al.  Comparatively weak after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cortical excitability in humans , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[10]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Induction of Late LTP-Like Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex by Repeated Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[11]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Effect of the Nicotinic α4β2-receptor Partial Agonist Varenicline on Non-invasive Brain Stimulation-Induced Neuroplasticity in the Human Motor Cortex. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Abnormal bihemispheric responses in schizophrenia patients following cathodal transcranial direct stimulation , 2012, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience.

[13]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  P-Curve: A Key to the File Drawer , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  D. Reato,et al.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[15]  Riccardo Russo,et al.  Perception of Comfort During Active and Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Double Blind Study , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[16]  Myoung-Hwan Ko,et al.  Facilitation of corticospinal tract excitability by transcranial direct current stimulation combined with voluntary grip exercise , 2013, Neuroscience Letters.

[17]  W. Paulus,et al.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortex on corticospinal and transcallosal excitability , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  A. Antal,et al.  Comparing cutaneous perception induced by electrical stimulation using rectangular and round shaped electrodes , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[19]  C. Rivera,et al.  Neurturin Evokes MAPK-Dependent Upregulation of Egr4 and KCC2 in Developing Neurons , 2011, Neural plasticity.

[20]  G. Cosentino,et al.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex enhances memory-guided responses in a visuospatial working memory task. , 2014, Functional neurology.

[21]  Shapour Jaberzadeh,et al.  The effects of anodal-tDCS on corticospinal excitability enhancement and its after-effects: conventional vs. unihemispheric concurrent dual-site stimulation , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[22]  Antonio Oliviero,et al.  Effects of simultaneous bilateral tDCS of the human motor cortex , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[23]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Modulating functional connectivity patterns and topological functional organization of the human brain with transcranial direct current stimulation , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[25]  P. Fitzgerald,et al.  Anodal Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation: The Effects of Pulse Duration on Corticospinal Excitability , 2015, PloS one.

[26]  J E Lisman,et al.  Three Ca2+ levels affect plasticity differently: the LTP zone, the LTD zone and no man's land , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  Ludovica Labruna,et al.  Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after‐effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation , 2017, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  O. Carter,et al.  Evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates little-to-no reliable neurophysiologic effect beyond MEP amplitude modulation in healthy human subjects: A systematic review , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  Catherine Sherrington,et al.  Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. , 2003, Physical therapy.

[30]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[31]  Maria Concetta Pellicciari,et al.  Excitability modulation of the motor system induced by transcranial direct current stimulation: A multimodal approach , 2013, NeuroImage.

[32]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[33]  Nicole Wenderoth,et al.  Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation of Visual Cortex: Stochastic Resonance Enhances Central Mechanisms of Perception , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Dopaminergic modulation of long‐lasting direct current‐induced cortical excitability changes in the human motor cortex , 2006 .

[35]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Time course of the induction of homeostatic plasticity generated by repeated transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Focusing Effect of Acetylcholine on Neuroplasticity in the Human Motor Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  C. Freitag,et al.  Stimulation intensities of transcranial direct current stimulation have to be adjusted in children and adolescents , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[38]  Increased short latency afferent inhibition after anodal transcranial direct current stimulation , 2011, Neuroscience Letters.

[39]  Bidirectional variability in motor cortex excitability modulation following 1 mA transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy participants , 2016, Physiological reports.

[40]  H. R. Siebner,et al.  Slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation can induce bidirectional shifts in motor cortical excitability in awake humans , 2010, Neuroscience.

[41]  Sho Kojima,et al.  Comparison of Three Non-Invasive Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Methods for Increasing Cortical Excitability , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[42]  C. Im,et al.  What is the optimal anodal electrode position for inducing corticomotor excitability changes in transcranial direct current stimulation? , 2015, Neuroscience Letters.

[43]  L. Merabet,et al.  Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Challenges and future directions , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[44]  Cheryl L Porter,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex affects cortical drive to human musculature as assessed by intermuscular coherence , 2006, The Journal of physiology.

[45]  D. Liebetanz,et al.  Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[46]  A. Butler,et al.  A meta-analysis of the efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation for upper limb motor recovery in stroke survivors. , 2013, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[47]  A. Frazer,et al.  Induction of cortical plasticity and improved motor performance following unilateral and bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex , 2013, BMC Neuroscience.

[48]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Dosage‐dependent non‐linear effect of l‐dopa on human motor cortex plasticity , 2010, The Journal of physiology.

[49]  A. Antal,et al.  Modulating neuronal excitability in the motor cortex with tDCS shows moderate hemispheric asymmetry due to subjects' handedness: a pilot study. , 2012, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[50]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Preconditioning with transcranial direct current stimulation sensitizes the motor cortex to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation and controls the direction of after-effects , 2004, Biological Psychiatry.

[51]  M. Galea,et al.  The Effects of Sex Hormonal Fluctuations during Menstrual Cycle on Cortical Excitability and Manual Dexterity (a Pilot Study) , 2015, PloS one.

[52]  J. Verhoeven,et al.  Developmental Foreign Accent Syndrome: Report of a New Case , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[53]  Catherine Sherrington,et al.  Evidence for physiotherapy practice: a survey of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). , 2002, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[54]  A. Antal,et al.  Electrode-distance dependent after-effects of transcranial direct and random noise stimulation with extracephalic reference electrodes , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[55]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Introducing graph theory to track for neuroplastic alterations in the resting human brain: A transcranial direct current stimulation study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[56]  Shapour Jaberzadeh,et al.  Anodal transcranial pulsed current stimulation: A novel technique to enhance corticospinal excitability , 2014, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[57]  Carla Cannizzaro,et al.  Effect of Acetaldehyde Intoxication and Withdrawal on NPY Expression: Focus on Endocannabinoidergic System Involvement , 2014, Front. Psychiatry.

[58]  Berthold Langguth,et al.  Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy to Probe State- and Trait-Like Conditions in Chronic Tinnitus: A Proof-of-Principle Study , 2014, Neural plasticity.

[59]  C. Loo,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation treatment protocols: should stimulus intensity be constant or incremental over multiple sessions? , 2013, The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology.

[60]  A. Gouws,et al.  A Direct Demonstration of Functional Differences between Subdivisions of Human V5/MT+ , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[61]  R. Malenka,et al.  Synaptic Plasticity: Multiple Forms, Functions, and Mechanisms , 2008, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[62]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Enhancement of non-dominant hand motor function by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[63]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[64]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[65]  A. Antal,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[66]  S. Straube,et al.  Enriched enrollment: definition and effects of enrichment and dose in trials of pregabalin and gabapentin in neuropathic pain. A systematic review. , 2008, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[67]  S. Jaberzadeh,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Site-Specific Effects of Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Sensory Perception and Pain , 2015, PloS one.

[68]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Comparing Cortical Plasticity Induced by Conventional and High-Definition 4 × 1 Ring tDCS: A Neurophysiological Study , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[69]  Akio Kimura,et al.  Comparison of the After-Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Motor Cortex in Patients With Stroke and Healthy Volunteers , 2012, The International journal of neuroscience.

[70]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Boosting focally-induced brain plasticity by dopamine. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[71]  P. Fitzgerald,et al.  Use of theta-burst stimulation in changing excitability of motor cortex: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2016, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[72]  Klaus Pawelzik,et al.  Inhibitory STDP generates inverse models through detailed balance , 2013, BMC Neuroscience.

[73]  J. Genest,et al.  Clinical research. , 1990, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[74]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Serotonin Affects Transcranial Direct Current–Induced Neuroplasticity in Humans , 2009, Biological Psychiatry.

[75]  B. Greenberg,et al.  Menstrual cycle effects on cortical excitability , 1999, Neurology.

[76]  F. Fregni,et al.  Motor cortex-induced plasticity by noninvasive brain stimulation: a comparison between transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2013, Neuroreport.

[77]  Janet L. Taylor,et al.  Comparison of the Effects of Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Motor Cortical Excitability , 2015, The journal of ECT.

[78]  D. Reato,et al.  Gyri – precise head model of transcranial DC stimulation : Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad , 2010 .

[79]  A. Antal,et al.  Evaluating Aftereffects of Short-Duration Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation on Cortical Excitability , 2011, Neural plasticity.

[80]  R. Lanfear,et al.  The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science , 2015, PLoS biology.

[81]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Rapid Effect of Nicotine Intake on Neuroplasticity in Non-Smoking Humans , 2012, Front. Pharmacol..

[82]  A. Antal,et al.  Increasing Human Brain Excitability by Transcranial High-Frequency Random Noise Stimulation , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[83]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Partially non‐linear stimulation intensity‐dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans , 2013, The Journal of physiology.

[84]  A. Antal,et al.  Comparing the Efficacy of Excitatory Transcranial Stimulation Methods Measuring Motor Evoked Potentials , 2014, Neural plasticity.

[85]  Frank Padberg,et al.  Impaired Motor Cortex Responses in Non-Psychotic First-Degree Relatives of Schizophrenia Patients: A Cathodal tDCS Pilot Study , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[86]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Nicotinergic Impact on Focal and Non-Focal Neuroplasticity Induced by Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Non-Smoking Humans , 2011, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[87]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[88]  N. D. de Morton The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study. , 2009, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[89]  Z. Dvořák,et al.  Rifampicin Does not Significantly Affect the Expression of Small Heterodimer Partner in Primary Human Hepatocytes , 2011, Front. Pharmacol..

[90]  Dick F Stegeman,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation does not modulate motor cortex excitability in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2011, Muscle & nerve.

[91]  B. Cheeran,et al.  Inter-individual Variability in Response to Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Paradigms , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[92]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Dose-Dependent Inverted U-Shaped Effect of Dopamine (D2-Like) Receptor Activation on Focal and Nonfocal Plasticity in Humans , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[93]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Modulating cortico‐striatal and thalamo‐cortical functional connectivity with transcranial direct current stimulation , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[94]  S. Rossi,et al.  Time Course of Corticospinal Excitability and Autonomic Function Interplay during and Following Monopolar tDCS , 2014, Front. Psychiatry.

[95]  R. Ivry,et al.  Efficacy of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is Related to Sensitivity to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2016, Brain Stimulation.

[96]  Jonathan A C Sterne,et al.  Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. , 2001, BMJ.

[97]  A. Quartarone,et al.  Long lasting effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor imagery , 2004, Neuroreport.

[98]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Catecholaminergic consolidation of motor cortical neuroplasticity in humans. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[99]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Preconditioning of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence for Homeostatic Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[100]  Livia Puljak,et al.  Extracting data from figures with software was faster, with higher interrater reliability than manual extraction. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[101]  J. Higgins Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration , 2011 .

[102]  Michael C. Ridding,et al.  Low-intensity, short-interval theta burst stimulation modulates excitatory but not inhibitory motor networks , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[103]  G. Thickbroom,et al.  Interaction Between Simultaneously Applied Neuromodulatory Interventions in Humans , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[104]  S. Jaberzadeh,et al.  a-tDCS Differential Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability: The Effects of Electrode Size , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[105]  H. Johansen-Berg,et al.  The Homeostatic Interaction Between Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Motor Learning in Humans is Related to GABAA Activity , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[106]  W. Paulus,et al.  Towards unravelling task-related modulations of neuroplastic changes induced in the human motor cortex , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[107]  Jonathan J Deeks,et al.  Statistical algorithms in Review Manager , 2010 .

[108]  Shapour Jaberzadeh,et al.  Different Current Intensities of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Do Not Differentially Modulate Motor Cortex Plasticity , 2013, Neural plasticity.

[109]  Jessica M. Pisegna,et al.  Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2016, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[110]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacological Modulation of Cortical Excitability Shifts Induced by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Humans , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[111]  Yasuo Terao,et al.  Short and long duration transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the human hand motor area , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[112]  Emmanuel Haffen,et al.  Can transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) alleviate symptoms and improve cognition in psychiatric disorders? , 2014, The world journal of biological psychiatry : the official journal of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry.

[113]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Dopaminergic modulation of long-lasting direct current-induced cortical excitability changes in the human motor cortex. , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[114]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans , 2001, Neurology.

[115]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Acute and chronic effects of noradrenergic enhancement on transcranial direct current stimulation‐induced neuroplasticity in humans , 2017, The Journal of physiology.

[116]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Neuroplasticity in Cigarette Smokers Is Altered under Withdrawal and Partially Restituted by Nicotine Exposition , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[117]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Dosage-Dependent Effect of Dopamine D2 Receptor Activation on Motor Cortex Plasticity in Humans , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[118]  R. Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Can transcranial electrical stimulation improve learning difficulties in atypical brain development? A future possibility for cognitive training , 2013, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[119]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Evaluation of Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[120]  Paul B. Fitzgerald,et al.  Effects of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Working Memory: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Findings From Healthy and Neuropsychiatric Populations , 2016, Brain Stimulation.

[121]  S. Jaberzadeh,et al.  Does anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhance excitability of the motor cortex and motor function in healthy individuals and subjects with stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[122]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Physiological Basis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2011, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[123]  Louise Marston,et al.  Rethinking Clinical Trials of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Participant and Assessor Blinding Is Inadequate at Intensities of 2mA , 2012, PloS one.

[124]  B. Clark,et al.  Preliminary Evidence That Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhances Time to Task Failure of a Sustained Submaximal Contraction , 2013, PloS one.

[125]  Janet L. Taylor,et al.  Daily transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) leads to greater increases in cortical excitability than second daily transcranial direct current stimulation , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[126]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation in the low kHz range increases motor cortex excitability. , 2011, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[127]  Felipe Fregni,et al.  Cognitive effects and autonomic responses to transcranial pulsed current stimulation , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[128]  M. W. Brown,et al.  An experimental test of the role of postsynaptic calcium levels in determining synaptic strength using perirhinal cortex of rat , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[129]  A. Quartarone,et al.  Increased Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation After Effects During Concurrent Peripheral Electrical Nerve Stimulation , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[130]  B. Cheeran,et al.  Relationship Between Non-invasive Brain Stimulation-induced Plasticity and Capacity for Motor Learning , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[131]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling , 2012, Psychological science.

[132]  N. Black,et al.  The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. , 1998, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[133]  T. Davidson,et al.  Predicting Modulation in Corticomotor Excitability and in Transcallosal Inhibition in Response to Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[134]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Noninvasive remote activation of the ventral midbrain by transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex , 2013, Translational Psychiatry.

[135]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Mechanisms of Nicotinic Modulation of Glutamatergic Neuroplasticity in Humans , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[136]  Jared Cooney Horvath,et al.  Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions , 2016, Experimental Brain Research.

[137]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Boosting brain excitability by transcranial high frequency stimulation in the ripple range , 2010, The Journal of physiology.

[138]  A. Antal,et al.  Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[139]  A Berardelli,et al.  Ovarian hormones and cortical excitability. An rTMS study in humans , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[140]  F. Fregni,et al.  Inhibition of motor cortex excitability with 15Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.