Programming adaptive control to evolve increased metabolite production

The complexity inherent in biological systems challenges efforts to rationally engineer novel phenotypes, especially those not amenable to high-throughput screens and selections. In nature, increased mutation rates generate diversity in a population that can lead to the evolution of new phenotypes. Here we construct an adaptive control system that increases the mutation rate in order to generate diversity in the population, and decreases the mutation rate as the concentration of a target metabolite increases. This system is called feedback-regulated evolution of phenotype (FREP), and is implemented with a sensor to gauge the concentration of a metabolite and an actuator to alter the mutation rate. To evolve certain novel traits that have no known natural sensors, we develop a framework to assemble synthetic transcription factors using metabolic enzymes and construct four different sensors that recognize isopentenyl diphosphate in bacteria and yeast. We verify FREP by evolving increased tyrosine and isoprenoid production.

[1]  A. Giraud.  Adaptive Evolution of Bacteria in the Mouse Gut Costs and Benefits of High Mutation Rates , 2007 .

[2]  Karsten Zengler,et al.  Adaptive laboratory evolution--harnessing the power of biology for metabolic engineering. , 2011, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[3]  R. Somerville,et al.  Mutational uncoupling of the transcriptional activation function of the TyrR protein of Escherichia coli K-12 from the repression function , 1993, Journal of bacteriology.

[4]  J. Keasling,et al.  Modular Engineering of l-Tyrosine Production in Escherichia coli , 2011, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[5]  G. Stephanopoulos,et al.  Global transcription machinery engineering: a new approach for improving cellular phenotype. , 2007, Metabolic engineering.

[6]  Anu Raghunathan,et al.  Comparative genome sequencing of Escherichia coli allows observation of bacterial evolution on a laboratory timescale , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[7]  P. Foster,et al.  Determining mutation rates in bacterial populations. , 2000, Methods.

[8]  B. Wanner,et al.  One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Gregory Stephanopoulos,et al.  Construction of lycopene-overproducing E. coli strains by combining systematic and combinatorial gene knockout targets , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  F. Taddei,et al.  Costs and Benefits of High Mutation Rates: Adaptive Evolution of Bacteria in the Mouse Gut , 2001, Science.

[11]  A J Pittard,et al.  Regulation of aroL expression by TyrR protein and Trp repressor in Escherichia coli K-12 , 1994, Journal of bacteriology.

[12]  J. Keasling,et al.  Engineering a mevalonate pathway in Escherichia coli for production of terpenoids , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[13]  S. Fields,et al.  A novel genetic system to detect protein–protein interactions , 1989, Nature.

[14]  Jeffrey E. Barrick,et al.  Genome evolution and adaptation in a long-term experiment with Escherichia coli , 2009, Nature.

[15]  Michael M. Desai,et al.  The Balance Between Mutators and Nonmutators in Asexual Populations , 2011, Genetics.

[16]  A. Hurlburt,et al.  Escherichia coli Open Reading Frame 696 Is idi, a Nonessential Gene Encoding Isopentenyl Diphosphate Isomerase , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[17]  A. Greener,et al.  An efficient random mutagenesis technique using an E. coli mutator strain. , 1996, Methods in molecular biology.

[18]  C. Wolberger,et al.  Structural basis for ligand-regulated oligomerization of AraC. , 1997, Science.

[19]  R. Lenski,et al.  Evolution of high mutation rates in experimental populations of E. coli , 1997, Nature.

[20]  Jay D Keasling,et al.  Metabolic engineering delivers next-generation biofuels , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[21]  K. Hammer,et al.  The Sequence of Spacers between the Consensus Sequences Modulates the Strength of Prokaryotic Promoters , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[22]  L. Hellman,et al.  Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) for detecting protein–nucleic acid interactions , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[23]  Jay D Keasling,et al.  Production of isoprenoid pharmaceuticals by engineered microbes , 2006, Nature chemical biology.

[24]  D. Stillman,et al.  Disruption and mapping of IDI1, the gene for isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1992, Yeast.

[25]  Farren J. Isaacs,et al.  Programming cells by multiplex genome engineering and accelerated evolution , 2009, Nature.

[26]  J. Keasling,et al.  High-throughput metabolic engineering: advances in small-molecule screening and selection. , 2010, Annual review of biochemistry.

[27]  R. Schaaper.  Mechanisms of mutagenesis in the Escherichia coli mutator mutD5: role of DNA mismatch repair. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  B. E. Davidson,et al.  Analysis of an Escherichia coli mutant TyrR protein with impaired capacity for tyrosine‐mediated repression, but still able to activate atσ70 promoters , 1995, Molecular microbiology.

[29]  Chih-kuan Tung,et al.  Acceleration of Emergence of Bacterial Antibiotic Resistance in Connected Microenvironments , 2011, Science.

[30]  R. Lenski,et al.  Punctuated Evolution Caused by Selection of Rare Beneficial Mutations , 1996, Science.

[31]  R. Sauer,et al.  Optimizing the stability of single-chain proteins by linker length and composition mutagenesis. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  B. M. Lange,et al.  Isoprenoid biosynthesis: the evolution of two ancient and distinct pathways across genomes. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Timothy S. Ham,et al.  Production of the antimalarial drug precursor artemisinic acid in engineered yeast , 2006, Nature.

[34]  G. Stephanopoulos,et al.  Engineering Yeast Transcription Machinery for Improved Ethanol Tolerance and Production , 2006, Science.

[35]  Jay D. Keasling,et al.  Directed Evolution of AraC for Improved Compatibility of Arabinose- and Lactose-Inducible Promoters , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[36]  Peixiang Wang,et al.  Mechanism of Repression of the aroP P2 Promoter by the TyrR Protein of Escherichia coli , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[37]  M. Bergdoll,et al.  Metabolic engineering of monoterpene synthesis in yeast , 2011, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[38]  John M Woodley,et al.  Directed evolution of biocatalytic processes. , 2005, Biomolecular engineering.

[39]  S. Manrubia,et al.  Variable Mutation Rates as an Adaptive Strategy in Replicator Populations , 2010, PloS one.

[40]  J. Pittard,et al.  The TyrR regulon , 2004, Molecular microbiology.

[41]  Ewa Heyduk,et al.  Molecular beacons for detecting DNA binding proteins , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[42]  A. Traven,et al.  Yeast Gal4: a transcriptional paradigm revisited , 2006, EMBO reports.

[43]  Hideyuki Suzuki,et al.  Altered Oligomerization Properties of N316 Mutants of Escherichia coli TyrR , 2008, Journal of bacteriology.