A Self-Sensing Active Magnetic Bearing Based on a Direct Current Measurement Approach

Active magnetic bearings (AMBs) have become a key technology in various industrial applications. Self-sensing AMBs provide an integrated sensorless solution for position estimation, consolidating the sensing and actuating functions into a single electromagnetic transducer. The approach aims to reduce possible hardware failure points, production costs, and system complexity. Despite these advantages, self-sensing methods must address various technical challenges to maximize the performance thereof. This paper presents the direct current measurement (DCM) approach for self-sensing AMBs, denoting the direct measurement of the current ripple component. In AMB systems, switching power amplifiers (PAs) modulate the rotor position information onto the current waveform. Demodulation self-sensing techniques then use bandpass and lowpass filters to estimate the rotor position from the voltage and current signals. However, the additional phase-shift introduced by these filters results in lower stability margins. The DCM approach utilizes a novel PA switching method that directly measures the current ripple to obtain duty-cycle invariant position estimates. Demodulation filters are largely excluded to minimize additional phase-shift in the position estimates. Basic functionality and performance of the proposed self-sensing approach are demonstrated via a transient simulation model as well as a high current (10 A) experimental system. A digital implementation of amplitude modulation self-sensing serves as a comparative estimator.

[1]  Eric H. Maslen,et al.  Experimental Self-Sensing Results for a Magnetic Bearing , 2001 .

[2]  Hannes Bleuler,et al.  New results for self-sensing active magnetic bearings using modulation approach , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[3]  Tetsuya Iwasaki,et al.  Robustness Limitations in Self-Sensing Magnetic Bearings , 2006 .

[4]  H. Bleuler,et al.  Self-sensing active magnetic levitation , 1993 .

[5]  G. van Schoor,et al.  Self-sensing for electromagnetic actuators. Part II: Position estimation , 2011 .

[6]  Seung-Ki Sul,et al.  Sensorless position control of active magnetic bearings based on high frequency signal injection method , 2003, Eighteenth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, 2003. APEC '03..

[7]  Eugén Otto Ranft An improved model for self-sensing heteropolar active magnetic bearings , 2007 .

[8]  Richard Markert,et al.  Influence of cross-axis sensitivity and coordinate coupling on self-sensing , 2001 .

[9]  G. van Schoor,et al.  Self-sensing for electromagnetic actuators. Part I: A coupled reluctance network model approach , 2011 .

[10]  Dominick T. Montie,et al.  Performance Limitations and Self-Sensing Magnetic Bearings , 2003 .

[11]  Eric H. Maslen,et al.  Self–Sensing Magnetic Bearings , 2009 .

[12]  James F. Antaki,et al.  Position sensed and self-sensing magnetic bearing configurations and associated robustness limitations , 1998, Proceedings of the 37th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.98CH36171).

[13]  Andries Christiaan Niemann Self-sensing algorithms for active magnetic bearings , 2008 .

[14]  Myounggyu Noh,et al.  Self{Sensing Magnetic Bearings Driven by a Switching Power Amplier , 1996 .

[15]  Raoul Herzog,et al.  A Comparison of Linear Periodic and Nonlinear Control Strategies for Self-Sensing Magnetic Bearings , 2010 .

[16]  Bo Hu,et al.  Robustness analysis of digital feedback control systems with time-varying sampling periods , 2000, J. Frankl. Inst..