The Effects of Web Personalization on User Attitude and Behavior: An Integration of the Elaboration Likelihood Model and Consumer Search Theory

Web personalization can achieve two business goals: increased advertising revenue and increased sales revenue. The realization of the two goals is related to two kinds of user behavior: item sampling and item selection. Prior research does not provide a model of attitude formation toward a personalization agent nor of how attitudes relate to these two behaviors. This limits our understanding of how web personalization can be managed to increase advertising revenues and/or sales revenues. To fill this gap, the current research develops and tests a theoretical model of user attitudes and behaviors toward a personalization agent. The model is based on an integration of two theories: the elaboration likelihood model (ELM) and consumer search theory (CST). In the integrated model, a user's attitude toward a personalization agent is influenced by both the number of items he/she has sampled so far (from CST) and the degree to which he/she cognitively processes each one (from ELM). In turn, attitude is modeled to influence both behaviors--that is, item selection and any further item sampling. We conducted a lab study and a field study to test six hypotheses. This research extends the theory on web personalization by providing a more complete picture of how sampling and processing of personalized recommendations influence a user's attitude and behavior toward the personalization agent. For online merchants, this research highlights the trade-off between item sampling and item selection and provides practical guidance on how to steer users toward the attitudes and behaviors that will realize their business goals.

[1]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Adoption of Electronic Health Records in the Presence of Privacy Concerns: The Elaboration Likelihood Model and Individual Persuasion , 2009, MIS Q..

[2]  T. J. Stewart,et al.  The Secretary Problem with an Unknown Number of Options , 1981, Oper. Res..

[3]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model , 2001, MIS Q..

[4]  Bo-chiuan Su,et al.  Characteristics of Consumer Search On-Line: How Much Do We Search? , 2008, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[5]  Mark S. Silver,et al.  Decision Support Systems: Directed and Nondirected Change , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  Darryl A. Seale,et al.  Sequential Decision Making with Relative Ranks: An Experimental Investigation of the "Secretary Problem"> , 1997 .

[7]  Israel Spiegler,et al.  Modeling the search for the least costly opportunity , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  F. Mosteller,et al.  Recognizing the Maximum of a Sequence , 1966 .

[9]  H. Marsh,et al.  Structural equation models of latent interactions: evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. , 2004, Psychological methods.

[10]  James A. Bovaird,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling of Mediation and Moderation With Contextual Factors , 2007 .

[11]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[12]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Limits to Interfirm Coordination through Information Technology: Results of a Field Study in Consumer Packaged Goods Distribution , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Manfred Kochen,et al.  On the economics of information , 1972, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[14]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[15]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986 .

[16]  Ryan O. Murphy,et al.  Sequential Observation and Selection with Rank-Dependent Payoffs: An Experimental Study , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[17]  Shuk Ying Ho,et al.  Web Personalization as a Persuasion Strategy: An Elaboration Likelihood Model Perspective , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Curtis P. Haugtvedt,et al.  Need For Cognition and Attitude Persistence , 1989 .

[19]  Lisa R. Klein Evaluating the Potential of Interactive Media through a New Lens: Search versus Experience Goods , 1998 .

[20]  Ida E. Berger,et al.  The Effect of Advertising on Attitude Accessibility, Attitude Confidence, and the Attitude-Behavior Relationship , 1989 .

[21]  HeijdenHans User acceptance of hedonic information systems , 2004 .

[22]  Philip K. Chan,et al.  Learning implicit user interest hierarchy for context in personalization , 2008, IUI '03.

[23]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Influence Processes for Information Technology Acceptance: An Elaboration Likelihood Model , 2006, MIS Q..

[24]  Alison King Chung Lo,et al.  Consumer Sequential Search: Not Enough or Too Much? , 2003 .

[25]  Morris H. DeGroot,et al.  Some Problems of Optimal Stopping , 1968 .

[26]  R. Petty,et al.  The Influence of Spokesperson Trustworthiness on Message Elaboration, Attitude Strength, and Advertising Effectiveness , 2003 .

[27]  Jaideep Sengupta,et al.  All Cues Are Not Created Equal: Obtaining Attitude Persistence under Low-Involvement Conditions , 1997 .

[28]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Searching for the Lowest Price When the Distribution of Prices Is Unknown , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[29]  Gilbert A. Churchill A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[30]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  Choice behavior in an optional stopping task , 1970 .

[31]  B. Ratchford,et al.  Consumer information search revisited: Theory and empirical analysis , 1997 .

[32]  Curtis P. Haugtvedt,et al.  Advertising Repetition and Variation Strategies: Implications for Understanding Attitude Strength , 1994 .

[33]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[34]  S. Albright A Bayesian Approach to a Generalized House Selling Problem , 1977 .

[35]  John D. Hey,et al.  Are optimal search rules reasonable? and vice versa? (And does it matter anyway?) , 1981 .

[36]  M. Zanna,et al.  Attitudinal qualities relating to the strength of the attitude-behavior relationship☆ , 1978 .

[37]  PremkumarG.,et al.  Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage , 2004 .

[38]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Parallel and Sequential Testing of Design Alternatives , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[39]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[40]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[41]  Nicholas H. Lurie,et al.  A Consumer Perspective on Price-Matching Refund Policies: Effect on Price Perceptions and Search Behavior , 2001 .

[42]  Mark S. Silver,et al.  Decisional Guidance for Computer-Based Decision Support , 1991, MIS Q..

[43]  R. Petty,et al.  Positive Mood and Persuasion: Different Roles for Affect Under High- and Low-Elaboration Conditions , 1993 .

[44]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Extending the two‐stage information systems continuance model: incorporating UTAUT predictors and the role of context , 2011, Inf. Syst. J..

[45]  S. Lippman,et al.  THE ECONOMICS OF JOB SEARCH: A SURVEY* , 1976 .

[46]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  Consumer Search: Not Enough or Too Much? , 2001 .

[47]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[48]  Joachim Meyer,et al.  User attitudes towards news content personalization , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[49]  E. Deci,et al.  Need Satisfaction, Motivation, and Well-Being in the Work Organizations of a Former Eastern Bloc Country: A Cross-Cultural Study of Self-Determination , 2001 .

[50]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  An Evaluation Cost Model of Consideration Sets , 1990 .

[51]  R. Petty,et al.  Attitude strength : antecedents and consequences , 1995 .

[52]  Francesco Ricci,et al.  Measuring the impact of personalization and recommendation on user behaviour , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[53]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[54]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Effects of Personalizaion and Familiarity on Trust and Adoption of Recommendation Agents , 2006, MIS Q..

[55]  Sumit Sarkar,et al.  The Role of the Management Sciences in Research on Personalization , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[56]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Changes in Belief and Attitude Toward Information Technology Usage: A Theoretical Model and Longitudinal Test , 2004, MIS Q..

[57]  Shuk Ying Ho,et al.  Understanding the Impact of Web Personalization on User Information Processing and Decision Outcomes , 2006, MIS Q..

[58]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[59]  Xiaojie Yuan,et al.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of Personalized Web Search , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[60]  P. Freeman The Secretary Problem and its Extensions: A Review , 1983 .

[61]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Determining the informational, navigational, and transactional intent of Web queries , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[62]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Strategic Information Systems Planning Success: An Investigation of the Construct and Its Measurement , 1998, MIS Q..

[63]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems , 2004, MIS Q..

[64]  Maria Madlberger,et al.  Evaluating personalization and customization from an ethical point of view: an empirical study , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.