On the Potential of Kinematic GPR Surveying Using a Self-Tracking Total Station: Evaluating System Crosstalk and Latency

In this paper, we present an efficient kinematic ground-penetrating radar (GPR) surveying setup using a self-tracking total station (TTS). This setup combines the ability of modern GPR systems to interface with Global Positioning System (GPS) and the capability of the employed TTS system to immediately make the positioning information available in a standardized GPS data format. Wireless communication between the GPR and the TTS system is established by using gain variable radio modems. Such a kinematic surveying setup faces two major potential limitations. First, possible crosstalk effects between the GPR and the positioning system have to be evaluated. Based on multiple walkaway experiments, we show that, for reasonable field setups, instrumental crosstalk has no significant impact on GPR data quality. Second, we investigate systematic latency (i.e., the time delay between the actual position measurement by TTS and its fusion with the GPR data) and its impact on the positional precision of kinematically acquired 2-D and 3-D GPR data. To quantify latency for our kinematic survey setup, we acquired forward-reverse profile pairs across a well-known subsurface target. Comparing the forward and reverse GPR images using three fidelity measures allows determining the optimum latency value and correcting for it. Accounting for both of these potential limitations allows us to kinematically acquire high-quality and high-precision GPR data using off-the-shelf instrumentation without further hardware modifications. Until now, these issues have not been investigated in detail, and thus, we believe that our findings have significant implications also for other geophysical surveying approaches.

[1]  Steven Koppenjan,et al.  Chapter 3 – Ground Penetrating Radar Systems and Design , 2009 .

[2]  D. Daniels Ground Penetrating Radar , 2005 .

[3]  Rosemary Knight,et al.  Ground Penetrating Radar for Environmental Applications , 2001 .

[4]  F. Dime,et al.  Attaining Required Positioning Accuracy in Archeo-Geophysical Surveying by GPS , 2006, 2006 12th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference.

[5]  Mark Grasmueck,et al.  Integration of Ground-Penetrating Radar and Laser Position Sensors for Real-Time 3-D Data Fusion , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  Gaëtan Garcia,et al.  GPS latency identification by Kalman filtering , 2000, Robotica.

[7]  Roger A. Young,et al.  A hybrid laser-tracking/GPS location method allowing GPR acquisition in rugged terrain , 2002 .

[8]  Harry M. Jol,et al.  Ground penetrating radar : theory and applications , 2009 .

[9]  Leica Geosystems,et al.  The Kinematic Potential of Modern Tracking Total Stations - A State of the Art Report on the Leica TPS1200+ , 2008 .

[10]  Petre Stoica,et al.  Introduction to spectral analysis , 1997 .

[11]  Maurizio Fedi,et al.  Magnetic survey at the submerged archaeological site of Baia, Naples, southern Italy , 2005 .

[12]  J. Aaltonen,et al.  Geological mapping using GPR and differential GPS positioning: a case study , 2002, International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar.

[13]  Shuichi Rokugawa,et al.  Highly Efficient Cmp Surveying with Ground-Penetrating Radar Utilising Real-Time Kinematic Gps , 2005 .

[14]  Pilar Villamor,et al.  Detailed shallow geometry and vertical displacement estimates of the Maleme Fault Zone, New Zealand, using 2D and 3D georadar , 2006 .

[15]  Jan Van der Kruk,et al.  Accurate Imaging of Multicomponent GPR Data Based on Exact Radiation Patterns , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  Gianfranco Morelli,et al.  3-D high-resolution multi-channel radar investigation of a Roman village in Northern Italy , 2009 .

[17]  Salvatore Piro,et al.  Integrated geophysical and topographical investigation in the territory of Ancient Tarquinia (Viterbo, central Italy) , 2007 .

[18]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Mean squared error: Love it or leave it? A new look at Signal Fidelity Measures , 2009, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[19]  Alan G. Green,et al.  Semiautomated georadar data acquisition in three dimensions , 1999 .

[20]  Kenneth L. Kvamme,et al.  Robotic total station for microtopographic mapping: an example from the Northern Great Plains , 2006 .

[21]  Alan G. Green,et al.  Three-dimensional multicomponent georadar imaging of sedimentary structures , 2006 .

[22]  Alan G. Green,et al.  Topographic migration of georadar data: Implications for acquisition and processing , 2000 .

[23]  Ralf J. Weger,et al.  Full-resolution 3D GPR imaging , 2005 .

[24]  Gaëtan Garcia,et al.  Improving the accuracy of dynamic localization systems using RTK GPS by identifying the GPS latency , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[25]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.