Outcome of total knee replacement following explantation and cemented spacer therapy

Background: Infection after total knee replacement (TKR) is one of the serious complications which must be pursued with a very effective therapeutic concept. In most cases this means revision arthroplasty, in which one-setting and two-setting procedures are distinguished. Healing of infection is the conditio sine qua non for re-implantation. This retrospective work presents an assessment of the success rate after a two-setting revision arthroplasty of the knee following periprosthetic infection. It further considers drawing conclusions concerning the optimal timing of re-implantation. Patients and methods: A total of 34 patients have been enclosed in this study from September 2005 to December 2013. 35 re-implantations were carried out following explantation of total knee and implantation of cemented spacer. The patient’s group comprised of 53% (18) males and 47% (16) females. The average age at re-implantation time was 72.2 years (ranging from 54 to 85 years). We particularly evaluated the microbial spectrum, the interval between explantation and re-implantation, the number of surgeries that were necessary prior to re-implantation as well as the postoperative course. Results: We reported 31.4% (11) reinfections following re-implantation surgeries. The number of the reinfections declined with increasing time interval between explantation and re-implantation. Patients who developed reinfections were operated on (re-implantation) after an average of 4.47 months. Those patients with uncomplicated course were operated on (re-implantation) after an average of 6.79 months. Nevertheless, we noticed no essential differences in outcome with regard to the number of surgeries carried out prior to re-implantation. Mobile spacers proved better outcome than temporary arthrodesis with intramedullary fixation. Conclusion: No uniform strategy of treatment exists after peri-prosthetic infections. In particular, no optimal timing can be stated concerning re-implantation. Our data point out to the fact that a longer time interval between explantation and re-implantation reduces the rate of reinfection. From our point of view, the optimal timing for re-implantation depends on various specific factors and therefore it should be defined individually.

[1]  B. Mogensen,et al.  Bacterial contamination of the wound during primary total hip and knee replacement , 2014, Acta orthopaedica.

[2]  W. Mittelmeier,et al.  [Diagnostic strategies in cases of suspected periprosthetic infection of the knee. A review of the literature and current recommendations]. , 2006, Der Orthopade.

[3]  V. Bühren,et al.  Risikofaktoren für eine fehlgeschlagene Infektsanierung nach periprothetischer Hüftprothesenspätinfektion , 2012, Der Orthopäde.

[4]  K. Daniilidis,et al.  Two-Stage Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in Cases of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: An Analysis of 50 Cases , 2015, The open orthopaedics journal.

[5]  V. Bühren,et al.  [Replacement of infected knee and hip endoprostheses]. , 2010, Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen.

[6]  L. Gerdesmeyer,et al.  Diagnostische Strategien bei Verdacht auf periprothetische Infektion einer Kniegelenktotalendoprothese , 2006, Der Orthopäde.

[7]  R. Grimer,et al.  The incidence of deep prosthetic infections in a specialist orthopaedic hospital: a 15-year prospective survey. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  L. Frommelt.  [Guidelines on antimicrobial therapy in situations of periprosthetic THR infection]. , 2004, Der Orthopade.

[9]  J. Cuckler,et al.  Diagnosis and management of the infected total joint arthroplasty. , 1991, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[10]  M. Otto,et al.  [Histopathologic diagnostics in endoprosthetics: periprosthetic neosynovialitis, hypersensitivity reaction, and arthrofibrosis]. , 2009, Der Orthopade.

[11]  L. Drago,et al.  Two-stage revision of septic knee prosthesis with articulating knee spacers yields better infection eradication rate than one-stage or two-stage revision with static spacers , 2012, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[12]  L. Frommelt.  Prinzipien der Antibiotikabehandlung bei periprothetischen Infektionen , 2004, Der Orthopäde.

[13]  M. Herrmann,et al.  Das infizierte Implantat , 2005, Der Orthopäde.

[14]  R. Marx,et al.  Risk Factors for Revision Within 10 Years of Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2014, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  K. Mulhall,et al.  One‐stage Versus Two‐stage Exchange , 2014, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[16]  H. Buchholz,et al.  [Depot effects of various antibiotics mixed with Palacos resins]. , 1970, Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen.

[17]  R. McGraw,et al.  Two-stage exchange arthroplasty using a functional antibiotic-loaded spacer in the treatment of the infected knee replacement: the Vancouver experience. , 1994, Seminars in arthroplasty.

[18]  Ralf H. Gahr,et al.  GMS Interdisciplinary Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DGPW , 2012, GMS Interdisciplinary plastic and reconstructive surgery DGPW.

[19]  Robin Patel,et al.  icaA Is Not a Useful Diagnostic Marker for Prosthetic Joint Infection , 2004, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[20]  J. Lentino.  Prosthetic joint infections: bane of orthopedists, challenge for infectious disease specialists. , 2003, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[21]  Javad Parvizi,et al.  Diagnosis of Infected Total Knee: Findings of a Multicenter Database , 2008, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  K. Becker,et al.  Bedrohliche Zunahme Methicillin-resistenter Staphylococcus-aureus- Stämme , 2004 .

[23]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Are Cementless Stems More Durable Than Cemented Stems in Two-stage Revisions of Infected Total Knee Arthroplasties? , 2014, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  J. Parvizi,et al.  Preoperative diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: role of aspiration. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[25]  F. Buechel,et al.  Primary exchange revision arthroplasty for infected total knee replacement: a long-term study. , 2004, American journal of orthopedics.

[26]  K. Steinbrink,et al.  [Value of irrigation-suction drainage in the treatment of early infection of joint implants]. , 1989, Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen.

[27]  D. Backstein,et al.  Two-stage Revision Arthroplasty for Management of Chronic Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: Techniques, Controversies, and Outcomes , 2014, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[28]  H. Häfner,et al.  Das Keimspektrum von heute – gegen wen kämpfen wir? , 2012, Der Orthopäde.

[29]  D. Kilgus,et al.  Results of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infections Caused by Resistant Bacteria , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.