Space Debris Reentry Analysis Methods and Tools

The reentry of uncontrolled spacecraft may be broken into many pieces of debris at an altitude in the range of 75-85 km. The surviving fragments could pose great hazard and risk to ground and people. In recent years, methods and tools for predicting and analyzing debris reentry and ground risk assessment have been studied and developed in National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), European Space Agency (ESA) and other organizations, including the group of the present authors. This paper reviews the current progress on this topic of debris reentry briefly. We outline the Monte Carlo method for uncertainty analysis, breakup prediction, and parameters affecting survivability of debris. The existing analysis tools can be classified into two categories, i.e. the object-oriented and the spacecraft-oriented methods, the latter being more accurate than the first one. The past object-oriented tools include objects of only simple shapes. For more realistic simulation, here we present an object-oriented tool debris reentry and ablation prediction system (DRAPS) developed by the present authors, which introduces new object shapes to 15 types, as well as 51 predefined motions and relevant aerodynamic and aerothermal models. The aerodynamic and aerothermal models in DRAPS are validated using direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) method.

[1]  N. Johnson,et al.  Analysis of reentry survivability of UARS spacecraft , 2004 .

[2]  R. D. Klett DRAG COEFFICIENTS AND HEATING RATIOS FOR RIGHT CIRCULAR CYLINDERS IN FREE- MOLECULAR AND CONTINUUM FLOW FROM MACH 10 TO 30 , 1964 .

[3]  T. Lips,et al.  Survivability and ground risk potential of screws and bolts of disintegrating spacecraft during uncontrolled re-entry , 2001 .

[4]  Lyndon Bonaparte,et al.  A Strategy for Reducing Hazards from Reentry Debris , 2006 .

[5]  Ruifeng Hu,et al.  Aerodynamic map for soft and hard hypersonic level flight in near space , 2009 .

[6]  B. Fritsche,et al.  Computation of destructive satellite re-entries , 2001 .

[7]  T. Lips,et al.  A comparison of commonly used re-entry analysis tools , 2005 .

[8]  M. V. Frank,et al.  A probabilistic paradigm for spacecraft random reentry disassembly , 2005, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  B. Fritsche Note on the Application of SCARAB to the Mir Re-entry , 2001 .

[10]  T. Lips,et al.  Analytical and numerical re-entry analysis of simple-shaped objects , 2007 .

[11]  L. Mack Linear Stability Theory and the Problem of Supersonic Boundary- Layer Transition , 1975 .

[12]  Wm. C. Rochelle,et al.  Spacecraft Orbital Debris Reentry: Aerothermal Analysis , 1997 .

[13]  Zi-Niu Wu,et al.  Hybrid continuum/DSMC computation of rocket mode lightcraft flow in near space with high temperature and rarefaction effect , 2009 .

[14]  Ashish Tewari Entry Trajectory Model with Thermomechanical Breakup , 2009 .

[15]  J. R. Moselle,et al.  Studies of aerothermal loads generated in regions of shock/shock interaction in hypersonic flow , 1991 .

[16]  Serkan Özgen,et al.  Linear stability analysis in compressible, flat-plate boundary-layers , 2008 .

[17]  B. Fritsche,et al.  Spacecraft disintegration during uncontrolled atmospheric Re-entry , 2000 .

[18]  H. Klinkrad Space Debris: Models and Risk Analysis , 2006 .

[19]  T. Lips,et al.  Spacecraft destruction during re-entry – latest results and development of the SCARAB software system , 2002 .

[20]  Russell P. Patera Hazard Analysis for Uncontrolled Space Vehicle Reentry , 2008 .

[21]  W H Ailor,et al.  Spacecraft re-entry strategies: Meeting debris mitigation and ground safety requirements , 2007 .

[22]  L. Anselmo,et al.  BeppoSAX equatorial uncontrolled re-entry , 2004 .

[23]  Brian Ross,et al.  Space debris reentry risk analysis , 1994 .