Non-Temporal Point Cloud Analysis for Surface Damage in Civil Structures

Assessment and evaluation of damage in civil infrastructure is most often conducted visually, despite its subjectivity and qualitative nature in locating and verifying damaged areas. This study aims to present a new workflow to analyze non-temporal point clouds to objectively identify surface damage, defects, cracks, and other anomalies based solely on geometric surface descriptors that are irrespective of point clouds’ underlying geometry. Non-temporal, in this case, refers to a single dataset, which is not relying on a change detection approach. The developed method utilizes vertex normal, surface variation, and curvature as three distinct surface descriptors to locate the likely damaged areas. Two synthetic datasets with planar and cylindrical geometries with known ground truth damage were created and used to test the developed workflow. In addition, the developed method was further validated on three real-world point cloud datasets using lidar and structure-from-motion techniques, which represented different underlying geometries and exhibited varying severity and mechanisms of damage. The analysis of the synthetic datasets demonstrated the robustness of the proposed damage detection method to classify vertices as surface damage with high recall and precision rates and a low false-positive rate. The real-world datasets illustrated the scalability of the damage detection method and its ability to classify areas as damaged and undamaged at the centimeter level. Moreover, the output classification of the damage detection method automatically bins the damaged vertices into different confidence intervals for further classification of detected likely damaged areas. Moving forward, the presented workflow can be used to bolster structural inspections by reducing subjectivity, enhancing reliability, and improving quantification in surface-evident damage.

[1]  Nico Blodow,et al.  Towards 3D Point cloud based object maps for household environments , 2008, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[2]  Michael J. Olsen,et al.  In Situ Change Analysis and Monitoring through Terrestrial Laser Scanning , 2015, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[3]  Chih-Chen Chang,et al.  Localization and Quantification of Concrete Spalling Defects Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning , 2015, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[4]  S. Hao,et al.  I-35W Bridge Collapse , 2010 .

[5]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Statistical Damage Classification Under Changing Environmental and Operational Conditions , 2002 .

[6]  Andrew J. Graettinger,et al.  Laser Scanning Intensity Analysis for Automated Building Wind Damage Detection , 2015 .

[7]  Andreas Stavridis,et al.  Structural Identification of an 18-Story RC Building in Nepal Using Post-Earthquake Ambient Vibration and Lidar Data , 2017, Front. Built Environ..

[8]  Majid Nasrollahi Automated Bridge Inspection for Concrete Surface Defect Detection Using Deep Neural Network Based on LiDAR Scanning , 2019 .

[9]  Pedro Arias-Sánchez,et al.  Assessment of cracks on concrete bridges using image processing supported by laser scanning survey , 2017 .

[10]  E. Grinspun Discrete differential geometry : An applied introduction , 2008, SIGGRAPH 2008.

[11]  Wu Chen,et al.  Combination of overlap-driven adjustment and Phong model for LiDAR intensity correction , 2013 .

[12]  W. Gander,et al.  Least-squares fitting of circles and ellipses , 1994 .

[13]  Jon Louis Bentley,et al.  Multidimensional binary search trees used for associative searching , 1975, CACM.

[14]  Wilson H. Tang,et al.  Probability concepts in engineering planning and design , 1984 .

[15]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification (2nd ed.) , 1999 .

[16]  Cosma Rohilla Shalizi,et al.  Advanced Data Analysis from an Elementary Point of View , 2012 .

[17]  Konrad Schindler,et al.  FAST SEMANTIC SEGMENTATION OF 3D POINT CLOUDS WITH STRONGLY VARYING DENSITY , 2016 .

[18]  Falko Kuester,et al.  Terrestrial Laser Scanning-Based Structural Damage Assessment , 2010, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[19]  Andrew J. Graettinger,et al.  Cluster-Based Roof Covering Damage Detection in Ground-Based Lidar Data , 2015 .

[20]  Enoc Sanz-Ablanedo,et al.  Accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and SfM Photogrammetry Survey as a Function of the Number and Location of Ground Control Points Used , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[21]  Shuangshuang Jin,et al.  A comparison of algorithms for vertex normal computation , 2005, The Visual Computer.

[22]  Simon Laflamme,et al.  Adaptive wavelet neural network for terrestrial laser scanner-based crack detection , 2018, Automation in Construction.

[23]  Yu Wei Liu,et al.  Algorithmic clustering of LiDAR point cloud data for textural damage identifications of structural elements , 2017 .

[24]  Jerome F. Hajjar,et al.  Laser-based surface damage detection and quantification using predicted surface properties , 2017 .

[25]  Thomas W. Ryan,et al.  Bridge Inspector's Reference Manual: Volume 1 and Volume 2 , 2002 .

[26]  Meenakshisundaram Gopi,et al.  Eurographics Symposium on Point-based Graphics (2006) Efficient and Prioritized Point Subsampling for Csrbf Compression , 2022 .

[27]  Maurizio Seracini,et al.  Characterization of Full-Scale, Human-Form, Culturally Important Statues: Case Study , 2016 .

[28]  Sangjoon Park,et al.  Applications of laser scanning to structures in laboratory tests and field surveys , 2014 .

[29]  Richard L. Wood,et al.  Design procedures of retrofitted bridge rail. , 2016 .

[30]  Supratik Bose,et al.  Structural Assessment of a School Building in Sankhu, Nepal Damaged Due to Torsional Response During the 2015 Gorkha Earthquake , 2016 .

[31]  Mark de Berg,et al.  Computational geometry: algorithms and applications , 1997 .

[32]  Boris Jutzi,et al.  Semantic 3D scene interpretation: A framework combining optimal neighborhood size selection with relevant features , 2014 .

[33]  Richard L. Wood,et al.  LiDAR Scanning with Supplementary UAV Captured Images for Structural Inspections , 2015 .

[34]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  A New Approach for Health Monitoring of Structures: Terrestrial Laser Scanning , 2007, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[35]  Markus H. Gross,et al.  Efficient simplification of point-sampled surfaces , 2002, IEEE Visualization, 2002. VIS 2002..

[36]  Kenichi Soga,et al.  Distortion-Free Image Mosaicing for Tunnel Inspection Based on Robust Cylindrical Surface Estimation through Structure from Motion , 2016 .

[37]  Chenyang Lu,et al.  Cyber-Physical Codesign of Distributed Structural Health Monitoring with Wireless Sensor Networks , 2014, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst..

[38]  Halil Sezen,et al.  Cause of Damage and Failures in Silo Structures , 2009 .

[39]  Mani Golparvar-Fard,et al.  Image-Based Automated 3D Crack Detection for Post-disaster Building Assessment , 2014, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[40]  Nicholas Wilson,et al.  A Review of LIDAR Radiometric Processing: From Ad Hoc Intensity Correction to Rigorous Radiometric Calibration , 2015, Sensors.

[41]  A. Vetrivel,et al.  Disaster damage detection through synergistic use of deep learning and 3D point cloud features derived from very high resolution oblique aerial images, and multiple-kernel-learning , 2017, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.