Rapid Plant Identification Using Species- and Group-Specific Primers Targeting Chloroplast DNA

Plant identification is challenging when no morphologically assignable parts are available. There is a lack of broadly applicable methods for identifying plants in this situation, for example when roots grow in mixture and for decayed or semi-digested plant material. These difficulties have also impeded the progress made in ecological disciplines such as soil- and trophic ecology. Here, a PCR-based approach is presented which allows identifying a variety of plant taxa commonly occurring in Central European agricultural land. Based on the trnT-F cpDNA region, PCR assays were developed to identify two plant families (Poaceae and Apiaceae), the genera Trifolium and Plantago, and nine plant species: Achillea millefolium, Fagopyrum esculentum, Lolium perenne, Lupinus angustifolius, Phaseolus coccineus, Sinapis alba, Taraxacum officinale, Triticum aestivum, and Zea mays. These assays allowed identification of plants based on size-specific amplicons ranging from 116 bp to 381 bp. Their specificity and sensitivity was consistently high, enabling the detection of small amounts of plant DNA, for example, in decaying plant material and in the intestine or faeces of herbivores. To increase the efficacy of identifying plant species from large number of samples, specific primers were combined in multiplex PCRs, allowing screening for multiple species within a single reaction. The molecular assays outlined here will be applicable manifold, such as for root- and leaf litter identification, botanical trace evidence, and the analysis of herbivory.

[1]  G. McNickle,et al.  Molecular identification of roots from a grassland community using size differences in fluorescently labelled PCR amplicons of three cpDNA regions , 2011, Molecular ecology resources.

[2]  M. Traugott,et al.  Earthworm primers for DNA-based gut content analysis and their cross-reactivity in a multi-species system , 2006 .

[3]  P. Taberlet,et al.  DNA barcoding for ecologists. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  B. Corradini,et al.  Forensic botany: species identification of botanical trace evidence using a multigene barcoding approach , 2009, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[5]  M. Traugott,et al.  The feeding ecology of elaterid larvae in central European arable land: New perspectives based on naturally occurring stable isotopes , 2008 .

[6]  Alfried P Vogler,et al.  DNA barcoding insect–host plant associations , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  Mark W. Chase,et al.  A proposal for a standardised protocol to barcode all land plants , 2007 .

[8]  G. McNickle A PCR-based method for the identification of the roots of 10 co-occurring grassland species in mesocosm experiments , 2008 .

[9]  C. Field,et al.  A technique for identifying the roots of different species in mixed samples using nuclear ribosomal DNA , 2005 .

[10]  M. Traugott,et al.  Detecting ingested plant DNA in soil-living insect larvae , 2011, Soil biology & biochemistry.

[11]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA , 1991, Plant Molecular Biology.

[12]  P. Kalaitzis,et al.  The potential of plastid trnL (UAA) intron polymorphisms for the identification of the botanical origin of plant oils , 2010 .

[13]  M. Traugott,et al.  INVITED REVIEW: Molecular analysis of predation: a review of best practice for DNA‐based approaches , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[14]  H Ahokas,et al.  Interference of PCR amplification by the polyamines, spermine and spermidine. , 1993, PCR methods and applications.

[15]  Robert B. Jackson,et al.  PLANT COMPETITION UNDERGROUND , 1997 .

[16]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Universal DNA-based methods for assessing the diet of grazing livestock and wildlife from feces. , 2009, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[17]  B. Deagle,et al.  Analysis of Australian fur seal diet by pyrosequencing prey DNA in faeces , 2009, Molecular ecology.

[18]  R A Gibbs,et al.  Multiplex PCR: advantages, development, and applications. , 1994, PCR methods and applications.

[19]  L. Tsai,et al.  Species identification using sequences of the trnL intron and the trnL-trnF IGS of chloroplast genome among popular plants in Taiwan. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[20]  Thierry Vermat,et al.  Power and limitations of the chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron for plant DNA barcoding , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  P. Taberlet,et al.  New insights on diet variability revealed by DNA barcoding and high-throughput pyrosequencing: chamois diet in autumn as a case study , 2011, Ecological Research.

[22]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Noncoding plastid trnT‐trnF sequences reveal a well resolved phylogeny of basal angiosperms , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[23]  T. Glenn Field guide to next‐generation DNA sequencers , 2011, Molecular ecology resources.

[24]  David A. Bohan,et al.  Multiplex reactions for the molecular detection of predation on pest and nonpest invertebrates in agroecosystems , 2011, Molecular ecology resources.

[25]  T. A. Hall,et al.  BIOEDIT: A USER-FRIENDLY BIOLOGICAL SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT EDITOR AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR WINDOWS 95/98/ NT , 1999 .

[26]  Z. Cardon,et al.  Decomposition dynamics in mixed‐species leaf litter , 2004 .

[27]  H. de Kroon,et al.  Unravelling below‐ground plant distributions: a real‐time polymerase chain reaction method for quantifying species proportions in mixed root samples , 2008, Molecular ecology resources.

[28]  R. Koebner,et al.  AFLP fingerprinting reveals pattern differences between template DNA extracted from different plant organs. , 1997, Genome.

[29]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Who is eating what: diet assessment using next generation sequencing , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[30]  N. Baeshen,et al.  Biological Identifications Through DNA Barcodes , 2012 .

[31]  Moon-sik Yang,et al.  An Assessment of the Utility of Universal and Specific Genetic Markers for Opium Poppy Identification , 2010, Journal of forensic sciences.

[32]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Ecosystem rooting depth determined with caves and DNA. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  P. Wolf,et al.  Identification of roots of woody species using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis , 1999, Molecular ecology.

[34]  J. Young,et al.  Identification of roots from grass swards using PCR-RFLP and FFLP of the plastid trnL (UAA) intron , 2003, BMC Ecology.

[35]  S. Graham,et al.  Spatial patterns of plant diversity below‐ground as revealed by DNA barcoding , 2011, Molecular ecology.

[36]  Dennis S. Hill,et al.  Agricultural Insect Pests of Temperate Regions and their Control , 1987 .

[37]  A. Galimberti,et al.  Integrated taxonomy: traditional approach and DNA barcoding for the identification of filarioid worms and related parasites (Nematoda) , 2009, Frontiers in Zoology.

[38]  W. John Kress,et al.  A DNA barcode for land plants , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  F. Bakker,et al.  Patterns of nucleotide substitution in angiosperm cpDNA trnL (UAA)-trnF (GAA) regions. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[40]  Sandra Díaz,et al.  Leaf structure and defence control litter decomposition rate across species and life forms in regional floras on two continents , 1999 .

[41]  M. Bruford,et al.  Rapid screening of invertebrate predators for multiple prey DNA targets , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[42]  C. Tsou,et al.  DNA barcoding in plants: taxonomy in a new perspective , 2010 .

[43]  Peter M Hollingsworth,et al.  Selecting barcoding loci for plants: evaluation of seven candidate loci with species‐level sampling in three divergent groups of land plants , 2009, Molecular ecology resources.

[44]  P. Taberlet,et al.  New perspectives in diet analysis based on DNA barcoding and parallel pyrosequencing: the trnL approach , 2009, Molecular ecology resources.

[45]  Ò. Alomar,et al.  Development of specific ITS markers for plant DNA identification within herbivorous insects , 2010, Bulletin of Entomological Research.

[46]  M. Traugott,et al.  Endoparasitism in cereal aphids: molecular analysis of a whole parasitoid community , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[47]  I. Brunner,et al.  Molecular identification of fine roots of trees from the Alps: reliable and fast DNA extraction and PCR–RFLP analyses of plastid DNA , 2001, Molecular ecology.

[48]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  A universal molecular method for identifying underground plant parts to species , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[49]  Pierre Taberlet,et al.  Analysing diet of small herbivores: the efficiency of DNA barcoding coupled with high-throughput pyrosequencing for deciphering the composition of complex plant mixtures , 2009, Frontiers in Zoology.

[50]  M. Traugott,et al.  Molecular identification of detritivorous soil invertebrates from their faecal pellets. , 2010 .

[51]  S. Graham,et al.  Multiple Multilocus DNA Barcodes from the Plastid Genome Discriminate Plant Species Equally Well , 2008, PloS one.

[52]  A. Vogler,et al.  DNA profiling of host–herbivore interactions in tropical forests , 2010 .

[53]  E. Willerslev,et al.  Characterisation of insect and plant origins using DNA extracted from small volumes of bee honey , 2010, Arthropod-Plant Interactions.