Accessing other people's technology: do non-profit agencies need it? how to obtain it?

As patents and other forms of intellectual property become more pervasive in the next generation of biotechnologies, designing polices and practices to ensure sufficient freedom to operate (i.e., the ability to practice or use an innovation) will be crucial for non-profit agencies in the developed and developing world, especially those intent on developing improved seed varieties and other technologies destined for commercial release. Are non-profits exempt from intellectual property claims? What constitutes infringement of a patent? How does a non-profit establish its freedom to operate? We address these issues in this paper and evaluate various options for accessing other people's technologies. Options include cross- licensing agreements, research-only or cost-free licenses, market segmentation strategies, mergers or joint ventures, and patent pooling or clearinghouse mechanisms. Responding creatively to the new intellectual property environment will have far reaching consequences for the future of non-profit research.

[1]  Josh Lerner,et al.  Patenting in the Shadow of Competitors , 1995, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[2]  Julian M. Alston,et al.  Financing Agricultural R&D in Rich Countries: What's Happening and Why , 1998 .

[3]  Bonwoo Koo,et al.  Costing the Ex Situ Conservation of Genetic Resources: Maize and Wheat at CIMMYT , 1999 .

[4]  Gordon C. Rausser PUBLIC / PRIVATE ALLIANCES , 1999 .

[5]  R. Dalton Cereal gene bank accepts need for patents… , 2000, Nature.

[6]  M. Fafchamps,et al.  Land lease markets and agricultural efficiency: theory and evidence from Ethiopia , 2002 .

[7]  Philip G. Pardey,et al.  Investments in african agricultural research , 1997 .

[8]  Claudia Ringler,et al.  Irrigation and water resources in Latin America and the Caribbean: challenges and strategies , 2000 .

[9]  Ashok Gulati,et al.  What Affects Organization and Collective Action for Managing Resources? Evidence from Canal Irrigation Systems in India , 2002 .

[10]  S. Scherr,et al.  Pathways of development in the hillsides of Honduras: causes and implications for agricultural production, poverty, and sustainable resource use , 1999 .

[11]  N. Stafford,et al.  Biotechnology and Patent Infringement in the USA , 1999 .

[12]  Konstantinos Giannakas,et al.  Consumption effects of genetic modification: what if consumers are right? , 2002 .

[13]  Patricia Zambrano,et al.  South‐North Trade, Intellectual Property Jurisdictions, and Freedom to Operate in Agricultural Research on Staple Crops* , 2003, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[14]  Brian D. Wright Crop genetic resource policy: towards a research agenda , 1996 .

[15]  Scott R. Templeton,et al.  Population pressure and the microeconomy of land management in hills and mountains of developing countries , 1997 .

[16]  Freddy Nachtergaele,et al.  Spatial aspects of the design and targeting of agricultural development strategies , 1999 .

[17]  William H. Lesser,et al.  'HOLDING UP' THE PUBLIC AGBIOTECH RESEARCH SECTOR OVER COMPONENT TECHNOLOGIES , 2000 .

[18]  P. Pardey,et al.  Hidden harvest: U.S. benefits from international research aid , 1996 .

[19]  Julie Witcover,et al.  Small-scale farms in the western Brazilian Amazon: can they benefit from carbon trade? , 2000 .

[20]  L. Opie Conflict of interest in the debate over calcium-channel antagonists. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Philip G. Pardey,et al.  The changing organizational basis of African agricultural research , 1998 .

[22]  Peter B. R. Hazell,et al.  Sustainable agricultural development strategies in fragile lands , 1994 .

[23]  C. Buller,et al.  Partnerships between public and private: the experience of the Cooperative Research Center for Plant Science in Australia , 1999 .

[24]  M. Qaim Transgenic Virus Resistant Potatoes in Mexico: Potential Socioeconomic Implications of North-South Biotechnology Transfer , 1998 .

[25]  Michael Kirk,et al.  The effect of environmental variability on livestock and land-use management: The Borana plateau, southern Ethiopia , 2001 .

[26]  Julian M. Alston,et al.  The effects of the US Plant Variety Protection Act on wheat genetic improvement , 2002 .

[27]  M. Morris,et al.  Bringing the Benefits of Biotechnology to the Poor: The Role of the CGIAR Centers , 2000 .

[28]  Julie Witcover,et al.  The Impact of Technical Change in Agriculture on Human Fertility: District-level Evidence From India , 1994 .

[29]  Ximing Cai,et al.  Does efficient water management matter?: physical and economic efficiency of water use in the river basin , 2001 .

[30]  E. Marshall NIH, DuPont Declare Truce in Mouse War , 1998, Science.

[31]  Jordan Goodman,et al.  The Story of Taxol: Nature and Politics in the Pursuit of an Anti-Cancer Drug , 2001 .

[32]  Jennifer Washburn,et al.  The Kept University. , 2000 .

[33]  V. N. Misra,et al.  Role of terms of trade in Indian agricultural growth: a national and state level analysis , 1995 .

[34]  S. Kowalski The Intellectual and Technical Property Components of pro-Vitamin A Rice (GoldenRiceTM): A Preliminary Freedom-To-Operate Review , 2000 .

[35]  Brian D. Wright,et al.  The role of biodiversity products as incentives for conserving biological diversity: some instructive examples , 1999 .

[36]  Ximing Cai,et al.  Integrated economichydrologic water modeling at the basin scale: the Maipo river basin , 2000 .

[37]  Julian M. Alston,et al.  Summary of a productive partnership : the benefits from U.S. participation in the CGIAR , 1996 .

[38]  M. Blakeney,et al.  Proprietary by biotechnology inputs and international agricultural research , 1998 .

[39]  L. Bero,et al.  Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions. , 1998, JAMA.

[40]  Mario J. Miranda,et al.  New approaches to crop yield insurance in developing countries , 1999 .

[41]  Berhanu Gebremedhin,et al.  STRATEGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE ETHIOPIAN HIGHLANDS , 1999 .

[42]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[43]  E. Marshall Private Help for a Public Database? , 1998, Science.

[44]  M. Enserink Patent Office May Raise the Bar on Gene Claims , 2000, Science.

[45]  J. Barton New International Arrangements in Intellectual Property and Competition Law , 2003 .

[46]  Julian M. Alston,et al.  Paying for agricultural productivity , 1997 .

[47]  Bonwoo Koo,et al.  Endowing Future Harvests : The Long-Term Costs of Conserving Genetic Resources at the CGIAR Centres , 2002 .

[48]  Prabhu Pingali,et al.  Confronting the environmental consequences of the Green Revolution in Asia , 1994 .

[49]  Julian M. Alston,et al.  Dynamics in the creation and depreciation of knowledge, and the returns to research: , 1998 .

[50]  John Kerr,et al.  SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF RAINFED AGRICULTURE IN INDIA , 1996 .