Seismic performance of reinforced concrete shear wall frames considering soil–foundation–structure interaction

SUMMARY A practical application of ‘beam on nonlinear Winkler foundation’ approach has been utilized in this paper for a case study on seismic performance of concrete shear wall frames to assess the soil–foundation–structure interaction effects. A set of 3-, 6-, 10- and 15-story concrete shear wall frames located on hypothetically soft, medium and hard soils were designed and modeled using the OpenSees platform. The numerical model of each frame was constructed employing the distributed and lumped plasticity elements as well as the flexure–shear interaction displacement-based beam–column elements incorporating the soil–footing interface. Pushover analysis was performed, and the results were studied through two code-based viewpoints: (a) force-based design and (b) performance-based design. A comparison was made afterwards between the frame behaviors in the fixed-/flexible-base conditions. The results indicate some degree of inaccuracy in the fixed-base assumption, which is regularly applied in analysis and design practice. The study emphasizes on how the fixed-base assumption overestimates the design of the wall element and underestimates the design of the connected moment frame. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  M. Hesham El Naggar,et al.  An investigation into the Winkler modeling of the cyclic response of rigid footings , 2008 .

[2]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Simplified Earthquake Analysis of Structures with Foundation Uplift , 1985 .

[3]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Simplified Earthquake Analysis of Multistory Structures With Foundation Uplift , 1985 .

[4]  Luis Eduardo Pérez-Rocha,et al.  Use of global ductility for design of structure–foundation systems , 2011 .

[5]  Ioannis N. Psycharis Dynamic behavior of rocking structures allowed to uplift , 1981 .

[6]  Vitelmo V. Bertero,et al.  Evaluation of Strength Reduction Factors for Earthquake-Resistant Design , 1994 .

[7]  Mohammad Ali Ghannad,et al.  Site-dependent strength reduction factors for soil-structure systems , 2007 .

[8]  Luis Ibarra,et al.  Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration , 2005 .

[9]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis for estimating seismic performance sensitivity and uncertainty , 2010 .

[10]  D. K. Vaughan,et al.  Nonlinear soil-structure interaction , 1978 .

[11]  William T. Holmes,et al.  The 1997 NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures , 2000 .

[12]  Michael H. Scott,et al.  Plastic Hinge Integration Methods for Force-Based Beam¿Column Elements , 2006 .

[13]  Prishati Raychowdhury,et al.  Seismic response of low-rise steel moment-resisting frame (SMRF) buildings incorporating nonlinear soil–structure interaction (SSI) , 2011 .

[14]  Constantine C. Spyrakos,et al.  Seismic analysis of towers including foundation uplift , 1996 .

[15]  Luis Esteva,et al.  Influence of dynamic soil–structure interaction on the nonlinear response and seismic reliability of multistorey systems , 2007 .

[16]  Luis Eduardo Pérez-Rocha,et al.  Influence of Foundation Flexibility on Rμ and Cμ Factors , 2005 .