Coupled surface‐atmosphere reflectance (CSAR) model: 1. Model description and inversion on synthetic data

Absorption and scattering processes in the atmosphere affect the transfer of solar radiation along its double path between the Sun, the Earth's surface, and the satellite sensor. These effects must be taken into account if reliable and accurate information on the surface must be retrieved from satellite remote sensing data. One approach consists in characterizing the state of the atmosphere from independent observations and correcting the data with the help of radiation transfer models. This approach requires a detailed and accurate description of the composition of the atmosphere (e.g., aerosol and water vapor profiles in the case of advanced very high resolution radiometer data) at the time of the satellite overpass and requires significant computer resources. An alternative method is to attempt to simultaneously retrieve surface and atmospheric parameters by inverting a coupled surface-atmosphere model against remote sensing data. This study describes such a coupled model and the results of its inversion against synthetic data, using a nonlinear inversion technique. The results obtained are encouraging in that realistic directional reflectances at the top of the atmosphere can be produced, and the inversion of the model against these synthetic data is capable of estimating surface and atmospheric variables. The accuracy of the retrieval is studied as a function of the amount of noise added to the data. It is shown that some surface or atmospheric parameters are easier to retrieve than others with such a coupled model, and that although it appears to be difficult to accurately and reliably estimate the water vapor amount from channel 2, there is a definite possibility of retrieving the aerosol loading from simulated channel 1 data, if the type of aerosol can be assumed.

[1]  J. Goudriaan,et al.  Crop Micrometeorology: A Simulation Study , 1977 .

[2]  N. Goel,et al.  Inversion of vegetation canopy reflectance models for estimating agronomic variables. I. Problem definition and initial results using the Suits model , 1983 .

[3]  P. Deschamps,et al.  Influence of the atmosphere on space measurements of directional properties. , 1983, Applied optics.

[4]  Richard L. Thompson,et al.  Inversion of vegetation canopy reflectance models for estimating agronomic variables. V. Estimation of leaf area index and average leaf angle using measured canopy reflectances , 1984 .

[5]  N. Goel,et al.  Inversion of vegetation canopy reflectance models for estimating agronomic variables. III - Estimation using only canopy reflectance data as illustrated by the suits model. IV - Total inversion of the SAIL model. [Scattering by Arbitrarily Inclined Leaves , 1984 .

[6]  Richard L. Thompson,et al.  Inversion of vegetation canopy reflectance models for estimating agronomic variables. IV. Total inversion of the SAIL model , 1984 .

[7]  Richard L. Thompson,et al.  Inversion of vegetation canopy reflectance models for estimating agronomic variables. II. Use of angle transforms and error analysis as illustrated by suits' model , 1984 .

[8]  J. Lenoble Radiative transfer in scattering and absorbing atmospheres: Standard computational procedures , 1985 .

[9]  N. Goel,et al.  Evaluation of a Canopy Reflectance Model for LAI Estimation through Its Inversion , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Y. Kaufman,et al.  Non-Lambertian Effects on Remote Sensing of Surface Reflectance and Vegetation Index , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  M. Verstraete Radiation transfer in plant canopies - Transmission of direct solar radiation and the role of leaf orientation , 1987 .

[12]  N. Goel Models of vegetation canopy reflectance and their use in estimation of biophysical parameters from reflectance data , 1988 .

[13]  J. Goudriaan,et al.  The bare bones of leaf-angle distribution in radiation models for canopy photosynthesis and energy exchange , 1988 .

[14]  F. Baker,et al.  The International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP): A Study of Global Change , 1988, Environmental Conservation.

[15]  R. Dickinson,et al.  A physical model for predicting bidirectional reflectances over bare soil , 1989 .

[16]  D. Diner,et al.  MISR: A multiangle imaging spectroradiometer for geophysical and climatological research from Eos , 1989 .

[17]  R. Dickinson,et al.  A physical model of the bidirectional reflectance of vegetation canopies: 2. Inversion and validation , 1990 .

[18]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change : the IPCC scientific assessment , 1990 .

[19]  R. Dickinson,et al.  Relating surface albedos in GCM to remotely sensed data , 1990 .

[20]  B. Pinty,et al.  A physical model of the bidirectional reflectance of vegetation canopies , 1990 .

[21]  Bernard Pinty,et al.  Extracting information on surface properties from bidirectional reflectance measurements , 1991 .

[22]  F. Baret,et al.  validation d'un modèle de réflectance spectrale et directionnelle de sol , 1991 .

[23]  J. Jäger,et al.  Climate change: Science, impacts an policy , 1991 .

[24]  Ranga B. Myneni,et al.  Photon-Vegetation Interactions , 1991, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[25]  Book Review: Climate Change: Science, Impacts and Policy , 1991 .

[26]  Yoram J. Kaufman,et al.  Atmospheric correction against algorithm for NOAA-AVHRR products: theory and application , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[27]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Calculation of the angular radiance distribution for a coupled atmosphere and canopy , 1993, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[28]  G. Dedieu,et al.  SMAC: a simplified method for the atmospheric correction of satellite measurements in the solar spectrum , 1994 .