Cross-language psycholinguistics

Cross-linguistic research can be of valaue to psycholinguistics by allowing tests of hypotheses the testing of which would be severely confounded in a single language, and by providing simple and readily available control conditions. For a long time the resources of this kind of research were virtually ignored by psycholinguists; recent renewal of the relationship between psychology and linguistics, however, has led to a revival of cross-language psycholinguistics.

[1]  T. Au,et al.  Chinese and English counterfactuals: The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis revisited , 1983, Cognition.

[2]  Janet D. Fodor,et al.  The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model , 1978, Cognition.

[3]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Speech Perception as a Cognitive Process: The Interactive Activation Model. , 1983 .

[4]  Kenneth I. Forster,et al.  Left-to-right processes in the construction of sentences , 1966 .

[5]  D. Norris,et al.  A language-specific comprehension strategy , 1983, Nature.

[6]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  A Word Superiority Effect in a Phonetically Precise Orthography , 1981 .

[7]  Mark S. Seidenberg The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems , 1985, Cognition.

[8]  S. Pinker,et al.  Speakers' sensitivity to rules of frozen word order , 1979 .

[9]  Laurie Beth Feldman,et al.  VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION IN SERBO-CROATIAN IS NECESSARILY PHONOLOGICAL , 1981 .

[10]  D. J. Foss,et al.  Some effects of context on the comprehension of ambiguous sentences , 1973 .

[11]  Y. Levy It's frogs all the way down , 1983, Cognition.

[12]  H. Levin,et al.  The incidence of inflectional suffixes and the classification of word forms , 1964 .

[13]  Kenji Hakuta,et al.  Grammatical description versus configurational arrangement in language acquisition: The case of relative clauses in Japanese , 1981, Cognition.

[14]  Elizabeth Davidson,et al.  On putting the horse before the cart: Exploring conceptual bases of word order via acquisition of a miniature artificial language☆ , 1985 .

[15]  J. Mehler,et al.  Tails of Words: Monitoring Ambiguity , 1978 .

[16]  L. Katz,et al.  Relation between pronunciation and recognition of printed words in deep and shallow orthographies. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  Sentence Construction in German-English Bilinguals , 1968, Language and speech.

[18]  On the Relation Between Processing the Roman and the Cyrillic Alphabets: a Preliminary Analysis with Bi-Alphabetical Readers , 1978, Language and speech.

[19]  K. Forster Sentence completion in left- and right-branching languages , 1968 .

[20]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Words Written in Kana Are Named Faster Than the Same Words Written in Kanji , 1980 .

[21]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The syllable's differing role in the segmentation of French and English. , 1986 .

[22]  J F Juola,et al.  Dimensions of lexical coding in Chinese and English , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[23]  M Coltheart,et al.  The psycholinguistic analysis of acquired dyslexias: some illustrations. , 1982, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[24]  Jacques Mehler,et al.  Monitoring around the relative clause , 1980 .

[25]  Psychology without linguistics = language without grammar , 1981, Cognition.

[26]  L. Katz,et al.  Orthographic and phonemic coding for lexical access: evidence from Hebrew. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  D. Slobin,et al.  The development of locative expressions in English, Italian, Serbo-Croatian and Turkish , 1977, Journal of Child Language.

[28]  A. Bloom Caution—the words you use may affect what you say: A response to Au , 1984, Cognition.

[29]  Jean E. Newman,et al.  The phonological nature of phoneme monitoring: A critique of some ambiguity studies , 1978 .

[30]  Dan I. Slobin,et al.  A cross-linguistic study of the processing of causative sentences , 1979, Cognition.