An energy‐based damage model for seismic response of steel structures

This paper proposes a new model for quantifying the damage in structural steel components subjected to randomly applied flexural/shear stress reversals, such those induced by earthquakes. In contrast to existing approaches that consider the damage as a combination of the global amount of dissipated energy and maximum displacement, the proposed model represents the damage by two parameters: (a) the total dissipated energy and (b) the portion of the energy consumed in the skeleton part of the load-displacement curve. These parameters are employed to define a single 'damage index', which measures the level between 0 (no damage) and 1 (failure). The proposed model takes into account that the ultimate energy dissipation capacity of the steel component is path-dependent and can change throughout the entire response duration. The new model is derived from low-cycle fatigue static tests of round steel rods and steel plates subjected to bending and shear. The accuracy of the model is verified experimentally through dynamic real-time shaking table tests. From these tests, it is observed that the proposed model measures the level of damage at any stage of the loading process reasonably well and predicts the failure of the structural component accurately. The model can be easily implemented in a computer program to assess the level of seismic damage and the closeness to failure in new structures or to evaluate the safety of existing ones.

[1]  Hiroshi Akiyama,et al.  ULTIMATE ENERGY ABSORPTION CAPACITY OF SLIT-TYPE STEEL PLATES SUBJECTED TO SHEAR DEFORMATIONS , 1998 .

[2]  Y. K. Wen,et al.  Damage-Limiting Aseismic Design of Buildings , 1987 .

[3]  Carlo Andrea Castiglioni,et al.  A unified approach for the design of steel structures under low and/or high cycle fatigue , 1995 .

[4]  Helmut Krawinkler,et al.  Cumulative damage in steel structures subjected to earthquake ground motions , 1983 .

[5]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Loading rate effects and influence of floor slab on the seismic performance of RBS connections for steel moment resisting frames , 1997 .

[6]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  Cumulative damage‐based inelastic cyclic demand spectrum , 2004 .

[7]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  The use of damage functionals in earthquake engineering: A comparison between different methods , 1993 .

[8]  A. Ang,et al.  Seismic Damage Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Buildings , 1985 .

[9]  秋山 宏,et al.  Earthquake-resistant limit-state design for buildings , 1985 .

[10]  W. J. Hall,et al.  Assessment of Seismic Structural Damage , 1989 .

[11]  Benavent Climent Amadeo SEISMIC DESIGN OF STRUCTURES BY USING BRACE-TYPE HYSTERETIC DAMPERS(ブレース型履歴ダンパーを用いた構造物の耐震設計) , 1998 .

[12]  Daniele Veneziano,et al.  Seismic safety of reinforced concrete members and structures , 1982 .

[13]  Hiroshi Akiyama,et al.  ULTIMATE ENERGY ABSORPTION CAPACITY OF ROUND-SHAPE STEEL RODS SUBJECTED TO BENDING , 1995 .

[14]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  Equivalent ductility factors, taking into account low‐cycle fatigue , 1992 .

[15]  Hiroshi Akiyama,et al.  INFLUENCE OF BAUSCHINGER EFFECT ON SEISMIC RESISTANCE OF STEEL STRUCTURES , 1990 .

[16]  S. Manson Behavior of materials under conditions of thermal stress , 1953 .

[17]  R. Brook,et al.  Cumulative Damage in Fatigue: A Step towards Its Understanding , 1969 .

[18]  A. Ang,et al.  Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete , 1985 .

[19]  L. Coffin,et al.  A Study of the Effects of Cyclic Thermal Stresses on a Ductile Metal , 1954, Journal of Fluids Engineering.