Sustainable concept selection using ELECTRE

In the present scenario, industries are implementing sustainability concepts because of the consumers’ awareness regarding the eco-friendly products and services and in need to arrive at a concept that will not be economically beneficial alone but it should be sustainable. While implementing, mostly the sustainability context is discussed from two perspectives such as environmental, economic, and social or in material, product and process orientation in manufacturing units. Since sustainable development is a multi-dimensional concept, Multi Criterion Decision Making (MCDM) method can be used to find out the best alternative among the given alternatives. In this context, one of the MCDM method namely ELECTRE II (ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalite) is used to find out the best orientation among the three orientations such as material, product, and process.

[1]  Leroy White,et al.  Operational research and sustainable development: Tackling the social dimension , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Mark Hadfield,et al.  A sustainable product design model , 2006 .

[3]  David Rechenthin,et al.  Project safety as a sustainable competitive advantage. , 2004, Journal of safety research.

[4]  T. Schoenherr The Role of Environmental Management in Sustainable Business Development: A Multi-Country Investigation , 2012 .

[5]  Ali Shanian,et al.  A material selection model based on the concept of multiple attribute decision making , 2006 .

[6]  Thiago Tinoco Pires,et al.  A Decision-Aided Fire Risk Analysis , 2005 .

[7]  André Zein,et al.  Bringing sustainable manufacturing into practice--the machine tool case , 2008 .

[8]  S. Vinodh Improvement of agility and sustainability: A case study in an Indian rotary switches manufacturing organisation , 2010 .

[9]  Wen-Hsien Tsai,et al.  Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: A novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP, and ZOGP , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  S. Vinodh,et al.  Leanness assessment using multi-grade fuzzy approach , 2011 .

[11]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Conceptualising sustainability assessment , 2004 .

[12]  Risto Lahdelma,et al.  Comparing multicriteria methods in the context of environmental problems , 1998 .

[13]  Ming-Lang Tseng,et al.  Modeling sustainable production indicators with linguistic preferences , 2013 .

[14]  Ron Vreeker,et al.  Selecting an Appropriate Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Technique for Renewable Energy Planning , 2006 .

[15]  Constanta Zoie Radulescu,et al.  Sustainable production technologies which take into account environmental constraints , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Ad J. de Ron,et al.  Sustainable production: The ultimate result of a continuous improvement , 1998 .

[17]  Bopaya Bidanda,et al.  Modeling sustainable product lifecycle decision support systems , 2009 .

[18]  Desta Mebratu Sustainability and sustainable development: Historical and conceptual review , 1998 .

[19]  Peter Krajnik,et al.  Transitioning to sustainable production – Part I: application on machining technologies , 2010 .

[20]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Selection of materials using compromise ranking and outranking methods , 2009 .

[21]  Napsiah Ismail,et al.  Application of analytical hierarchy process in the design concept selection of automotive composite bumper beam during the conceptual design stage , 2009 .

[22]  J. Sarkis A Sustainability Decision Model for the Built Environment , 2009 .

[23]  S. Vinodh,et al.  Integration of ECQFD and LCA for sustainable product design , 2010 .

[24]  Kevin Pietersen,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA): A tool to support sustainable management of groundwater resources in South Africa , 2007 .

[25]  A. Kania,et al.  Strategies of sustainable development in practice , 2007 .

[26]  Raine Isaksson,et al.  What does GRI‐reporting tell us about corporate sustainability? , 2008 .

[27]  Rosnah Mohd Yusuff,et al.  On the use of MCDM technique for identifying key technology: a case of auto company , 2011 .