Modeling Goals and Functions of Control and Safety Systems - theoretical foundations and extensions of MFM

Multilevel Flow Modeling (MFM) has proven to be an effective modeling tool for reasoning about plant failure and control strategies and is currently exploited for operator support in diagnosis [3, 4] and on-line alarm analysis [6]. Previous MFM research was focussed on representing goals and functions of process plants which generate, transform and distribute mass and energy [10, 11]. However, only a limited consideration has been given to the problems of modeling the control systems. Control functions are indispensable for operating any industrial plant. But modeling of control system functions has proven to be a more challenging problem than modeling functions of energy and mass processes. The problems were discussed by Lind [8, 9, 10] and tentative solutions has been proposed but have not been investigated in depth until recently, partly due to the lack of an appropriate theoretical foundation. The purposes of the present report are to show that such a theoretical foundation for modeling goals and functions of control systems can be built from concepts and theories of action developed by Von Wright [23] and to show how the theoretical foundation can be used to extend MFM with concepts for modeling control systems. The theoretical foundations has been presented in detail elsewhere by the present author [12, 14] without the particular focus on modeling control actions and MFM adopted here.

[1]  K. J. Craik,et al.  The nature of explanation , 1944 .

[2]  Morten Lind,et al.  Making sense of the abstraction hierarchy in the power plant domain , 2003, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[3]  W. H. F. Barnes The Nature of Explanation , 1944, Nature.

[4]  M. C. Robbins,et al.  Nuclear Safety Chains , 1981 .

[5]  Jan Eric Larsson Diagnostic reasoning based on means-end models: experiences and future prospects , 2002, Knowl. Based Syst..

[6]  J.E. Larsson Diagnostic reasoning based on means-end models: experiences and future prospects , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (Cat. No.99CH36328).

[7]  Morten Lind Means and ends of control , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37583).

[8]  W. Haddon Energy damage and the ten countermeasure strategies. , 1973, Human factors.

[9]  Penelope M. Sanderson,et al.  Modeling “Deranged” Physiological Systems for Icu Information System Design , 2000 .

[10]  Johannes Petersen Means-end Models of Safety Related Organizational Processes , 2004 .

[11]  F. R. Hubbard,et al.  Nuclear power-plant safety functions , 1981 .

[12]  Charles Morris,et al.  Signification and Significance. , 1966 .

[13]  Morten Lind,et al.  Plant modelling for human supervisory control , 1999 .

[14]  Morten Lind Generic Control Tasks in Process Plant Operation , 1982 .

[15]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Cognitive Systems Engineering , 2022 .

[16]  Johannes Petersen Situation Assessment of Complex Dynamic Systems Using MFM , 2001 .

[17]  Morten Lind,et al.  Modeling goals and functions of complex industrial plants , 1994, Appl. Artif. Intell..