Transition Towards Renewable Energy: Co-Ordination and Technological Strategies in the Swedish Pulp and Paper Industry 1973-1990

This paper examines the transition towards renewable energy in the Swedish pulp and paper industry (PPI) during the 1970s and -80s. In the wake of the first Oil Crisis until the late 1980s, the use of fossil fuels was reduced by 70 percent in this sector. The lion’s share of the reduction was achieved by substituting oil by biofuels in terms of rest products from the pulp manufacturing process. The reduction was made possible also by efficiency improvements and increased internal production of electricity through back-pressure turbine power generation. Sweden was highly dependent on oil when the first Oil Crisis broke, and the run up in oil prices put pressure on the Swedish government and the energy intensive PPI to reduce dependency. Of central importance for the transition to be implemented was a highly collaborative strategy of the sector as well as between the sector and the corporatist Swedish state administration. The Swedish government chose a proactive strategy by emphasizing knowledge management and collaboration with industry along with the substitution of oil with biofuels. The transition was further fueled by the fact that focus was directed towards unutilized potentials in the sector, where a previous waste problem now could be transformed into energy savings, i.e., the strong version of the Porter hypothesis. Also energy taxes and fees played a major role as control agents in the Swedish energy policy of the 1970s and 80s. Thus, the study illustrates the central role of governments and their ability to push industries into new technological paths through a wide palette of interplaying policy instruments. The study further points at the importance of a more holistic understanding of the interplay between different policies and impacts in the longer run.

[1]  Ann-Kristin Bergquist,et al.  Firm collaboration and environmental adaptation. The case of the Swedish pulp and paper industry 1900–1990 , 2012 .

[2]  D. Meadows,et al.  The Limits to Growth , 1972 .

[3]  M. Dean,et al.  Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society , 1999 .

[4]  Lettie McSpadden Wenner,et al.  The Hare and the Tortoise: Clean Air Policies in the United States and Sweden . By Lundqvist Lennart J.. (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1980. Pp. xii + 236. $15.00.) , 1981, American Political Science Review.

[5]  Eva Henriksson Industrial electricity demand and energy efficiency policy , 2010 .

[6]  Mikael Ottosson,et al.  An energy efficient Swedish pulp and paper industry – exploring barriers to and driving forces for cost-effective energy efficiency investments , 2008 .

[7]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[8]  E. Mårald,et al.  Methanol as future fuel: efforts to develop alternative fuels in Sweden after the Oil Crisis , 2010 .

[9]  Bo Rothstein Den korporativa staten : intresseorganisationer och statsförvaltning i svensk politik , 1992 .

[10]  Leif Lewin Ideologi och strategi : svensk politik under 100 år , 1984 .

[11]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Exploring the black box: Telecommunications: complex, uncertain, and path dependent , 1994 .

[12]  Neil Gunningham,et al.  Shades of Green: Business, Regulation, and Environment , 2003 .

[13]  Esa Vakkilainen,et al.  Energy Efficiency in the Brazilian Pulp and Paper Industry , 2012 .

[14]  P. Hall,et al.  Varieties of Capitalism , 2001 .

[15]  Patrik Ekheimer,et al.  Tidningspapper av returpapper - Den svenska massa- och pappersindustrins omvandling under senare delen av 1900-talet , 2006 .

[16]  Kristina Söderholm,et al.  Green Innovation Systems in Swedish Industry, 1960–1989 , 2011, Business History Review.

[17]  R. Lundmark,et al.  Structural changes in industrial electricity use: the case of the pulp and paper industry in Sweden , 2013 .

[18]  Thomas Magnusson,et al.  Socio-technical regimes and heterogeneous capabilities: the Swedish pulp and paper industry's response to energy policies , 2013, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[19]  Vladimir M Wolpert Environmental policy and industrial innovation: Strategies in Europe, the US and Japan: David Wallace The Royal Institute of International Affairs, London and Earthscan Publications Ltd, June 1995, 304 pp , 1996 .

[20]  M. Lindmark,et al.  Energy transition, carbon dioxide reduction and output growth in the Swedish pulp and paper industry : 1973-2006 , 2011 .

[21]  I. Parker Facts and figures. , 1973, The Probe.

[22]  P. Svenningsson,et al.  Seeing the wood for the trees: 25 years of renewable energy policy in Sweden , 2004 .

[23]  David Wallace,et al.  Environmental Policy and Industrial Innovation: Strategies in Europe, the USA and Japan , 2017 .

[24]  J. Meadowcroft Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions , 2011 .

[25]  Kristina Söderholm,et al.  Growing Green and Competitive—A Case Study of a Swedish Pulp Mill , 2013 .

[26]  Maria T. Johansson Improved energy efficiency within the Swedish steel industry—the importance of energy management and networking , 2015 .

[27]  Christian Stenqvist,et al.  Trends in energy performance of the Swedish pulp and paper industry: 1984–2011 , 2015 .

[28]  Lars J Nilsson,et al.  New energy strategies in the Swedish pulp and paper industry - The role of national and EU climate and energy policies , 2011 .

[29]  Sverker Sörlin En ny institutssektor : En analys av industriforskningsinstitutens villkor och framtid ur ett närings- och innovationspolitiskt perspektiv , 2006 .

[30]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics, and History , 1994 .