Perceptions of engineering identity: Diversity and EWB-USA

Currently, the engineering community faces shortages. These shortages can be conceptualized as both literal shortages of numbers, particularly females, and a more conceptual shortage of engineers who are trained and qualified to handle the transitioning global context of the profession. With its rapid growth, high female involvement, and global vision, Engineers Without Borders-USA (EWB-USA) stands as a prime research model for the larger engineering field. During a series of five regional EWB-USA workshops, participants were asked to respond to six open-ended questions dealing with identity and gains from their involvement. Thousands of unique responses were coded into emergent themes to identify the most common responses and to compare response themes across questions. Results suggest that EWB-USA members identify strongly with the organization, which may increase their identity with and motivation to remain in the profession. Results also show that EWB-USA members are filling significant education gaps from their organizational involvement and are gaining the desirable global engineering qualities required within the field. These results help unpack the motivations driving EWB-USA members and gains from their membership that may help, through future curriculum development, attract and retain a diverse engineering population able to handle future challenges required by the profession.

[1]  Mitchell Robinson Changing the conversation , 2008 .

[2]  Ruth A. Streveler,et al.  Why Do Students Choose Engineering? A Qualitative, Longitudinal Investigation of Students' Motivational Values , 2010 .

[3]  Moshe Hartman,et al.  Undergraduate Women's Participation in Professional Organizations , 2005 .

[4]  Paul D. Schreuders,et al.  Pipeline or personal preference: women in engineering , 2009 .

[5]  Amy M. Hightower,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators , 1993 .

[6]  Paula Quinn,et al.  Supporting Young Women to Enter Engineering: Long-Term Effects of a Middle School Engineering Outreach Program for Girls , 2009 .

[7]  A. Dainty,et al.  Education and employment: A preliminary study of female built environment undergraduate students in South Wales , 2011 .

[8]  D. Shen,et al.  Women Engineering Students and Self‐Efficacy: A Multi‐Year, Multi‐Institution Study of Women Engineering Student Self‐Efficacy , 2009 .

[9]  R. Truog,et al.  Changing the Conversation About Brain Death , 2014, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[10]  Sorrel King,et al.  Our story , 2019, Pediatric Radiology.

[11]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[12]  Matthew J. Miller,et al.  Testing the choice model of social cognitive career theory across Holland themes: A meta-analytic path analysis. , 2010 .

[13]  G. Elder,et al.  Informal Mentors and Education: Complementary or Compensatory Resources? , 2009, Sociology of education.

[14]  Y. Hoh Using Biographies of Outstanding Women in Bioengineering to Dispel Biology Teachers' Misperceptions of Engineers , 2009 .

[15]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[16]  Steven D. Brown,et al.  Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance , 1994 .

[17]  Leslie D. Hall,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators 2010. NSB 10-01. , 2010 .

[18]  Jacob M. Marszalek,et al.  a Cox Regression Analysis of a Women's Mentoring Program in Engineering , 2009 .