Size Matters: Defining Critical in Bone Defect Size!

Bone defects are common and are associated with a significant burden of disease. The treatment of these injuries remains controversial, particularly those defects which are critical sized. Despite the need for decision making to be evidence based, a lack of consensus around definitions of critical-sized defects still exists, particularly around those defects in the 1-3 cm range. There is a need to define "critical" in bone defect size because noncritical defects may heal without planned reconstruction and secondary surgery. This article reviews the current evidence around the definition of a critical-sized bone defect and concludes that defects in the order of 2.5 cm or greater seem to have a poor natural history.

[1]  P. Giannoudis,et al.  Spontaneous healing of large femoral cortical bone defects: does genetic predisposition play a role? , 2003, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[2]  C. Court-Brown,et al.  Tibial fractures with bone loss treated by primary reamed intramedullary nailing. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[3]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Critical-Sized Defect in the Tibia: Is it Critical? Results From the SPRINT Trial , 2012, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[4]  Philippe Rosset,et al.  Bone fracture healing: cell therapy in delayed unions and nonunions. , 2015, Bone.

[5]  J. Cohen,et al.  Data versus meaningless facts. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  C. Court-Brown,et al.  Locked intramedullary nailing of open tibial fractures. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  J O Hollinger,et al.  The critical size defect as an experimental model to test bone repair materials. , 1990, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[8]  M. McKee,et al.  Managing Bone Defects , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[9]  A. Simpson,et al.  The management of fractures with bone loss. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[10]  M. Bosse,et al.  Defining the Lower Limit of a “Critical Bone Defect” in Open Diaphyseal Tibial Fractures , 2016, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[11]  R. Brumback,et al.  Early prophylactic bone grafting of high-energy tibial fractures. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  Z. Gugala,et al.  Regeneration of segmental diaphyseal defects in sheep tibiae using resorbable polymeric membranes: a preliminary study. , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[13]  Georg N Duda,et al.  The challenge of establishing preclinical models for segmental bone defect research. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[14]  D. Hutmacher,et al.  Establishment of a preclinical ovine model for tibial segmental bone defect repair by applying bone tissue engineering strategies. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[15]  J. Keating,et al.  Exchange intramedullary nailing. Its use in aseptic tibial nonunion. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[16]  W. Obremskey,et al.  Current Practice in the Management of Open Fractures Among Orthopaedic Trauma Surgeons. Part B: Management of Segmental Long Bone Defects. A Survey of Orthopaedic Trauma Association Members , 2014, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.