Surveillance of Contact Lens Related Microbial Keratitis in Australia and New Zealand: Multi-Source Case-Capture and Cost-Effectiveness

Purpose: To evaluate a multi-source surveillance system used in a 12-month study of contact lens related microbial keratitis in Australia and New Zealand. Methods: All practicing ophthalmologists and optometrists were surveyed on 6 occasions over 12 months via post or the Internet. Participation was defined as reporting at least once during the study period and the response rates represented those who responded on all six occasions. Cases were also detected through hospital audit. All ophthalmologists and a sub-group of optometrists were contacted by phone to elicit a response (active surveillance). The utilization and cost-effectiveness of active surveillance were compared to reports received via the post or the Internet. Case ascertainment and cost-effectiveness were compared for different sources of case capture. Results: The rate of participation for ophthalmologists was 95.8% (711/742) and 88.5% (657/742) responded for all reporting periods. Active surveillance was required for 63% (416/661) of responses in Australia (AU) and 73% (59/81) in New Zealand (NZ) at AUD23.14 per practitioner. Internet reporting was more widely used in New Zealand (NZ: 31% vs. AU:17%, p = 0.006) and was the most cost effective mode of reporting (AUD1.43 per practitioner). Postal reporting (AUD; AU:3.54,NZ:9.84 per practitioner) was under-utilized (3% of responses). Average start-up costs comprised 50% of study costs followed by active follow-up (42%), postal (6%) and Internet reporting (2%). Ophthalmologists (50.4%, 144/286 of cases) were the most cost-effective source of cases, followed by hospital audit (24.5%, 70/286) and optometry (25.1%, 72/286). Duplicate reporting occurred in 13% (37/286) of cases. Conclusions: High response rates were obtained by substantial resource commitment to active follow-up. Internet reporting was widely used and was cost-effective. Hospital audit and supplementary reporting by optometry were used for the first time in a study of contact lens related microbial keratitis, and contributed significantly to case capture.

[1]  R E LaPorte,et al.  Ascertainment corrected rates: applications of capture-recapture methods. , 1993, International journal of epidemiology.

[2]  Aize Kijlstra,et al.  Incidence of contact-lens-associated microbial keratitis and its related morbidity , 1999, The Lancet.

[3]  R. Vogt,et al.  Comparison of an active and passive surveillance system of primary care providers for hepatitis, measles, rubella, and salmonellosis in Vermont. , 1983, American journal of public health.

[4]  Andrew D Oxman,et al.  Closing the gap between research and practice : an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings , 2011 .

[5]  K R Kenyon,et al.  Microbiology of contact lens-related keratitis. , 1989, Cornea.

[6]  Philip B. Morgan,et al.  Response to comment on 'Incidence of keratitis of varying severity among contact lens wearers' , 2005 .

[7]  N Morlet,et al.  View 1: Corneal scraping and combination antibiotic therapy is indicated , 2003, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  F. Stapleton,et al.  Contact lenses and other risk factors in microbial keratitis , 1991, The Lancet.

[9]  D V Seal,et al.  Population-based cohort study of microbial keratitis in Scotland: incidence and features. , 1999, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[10]  D S C Lam,et al.  Incidence and risk factors for microbial keratitis in Hong Kong: comparison with Europe and North America , 2002, Eye.

[11]  P B Morgan,et al.  Incidence of keratitis of varying severity among contact lens wearers , 2005, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[12]  J. Dart,et al.  Disease and risks associated with contact lenses. , 1993, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  H. Kelly,et al.  Using the two-source capture-recapture method to estimate the incidence of acute flaccid paralysis in Victoria, Australia. , 2002, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[14]  Lisa Keay,et al.  Evaluation of surveillance methods for an epidemiological study of contact lens related microbial keratitis , 2004, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[15]  E. C. Poggio,et al.  The incidence of ulcerative keratitis among users of daily-wear and extended-wear soft contact lenses. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  L. Lee,et al.  Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems: recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group. , 2001, MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports.

[17]  J. Jui,et al.  Electronic Reporting of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease From an Emergency Department , 2004, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[18]  F. Stapleton,et al.  Risk factors with contact lens related suppurative keratitis. , 1993, The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.

[19]  D C Minassian,et al.  Acanthamoeba keratitis in England and Wales: incidence, outcome, and risk factors , 2002, The British journal of ophthalmology.