Transformative innovation policy to meet the challenge of climate change: sociotechnical networks aligned with consumption and end-use as new transition arenas for a low-carbon society or green economy

A shift in international climate policy discourse toward a new shared narrative on the need for a ‘transition’ to a low-carbon society and green economy is outlined and assessed in terms of its implications for innovation policy. It is seen as recognition of the limits of incrementalism and the need for pervasive transformative innovation. Key passage points are identified in the early 2000s through which new ideas about transition moved from academic discussion into policy practice. Transitions thinking expresses a new synthesis of evolutionary and associational approaches in science, technology and innovation studies. It introduces concepts of sociotechnical networks and configurations which fulfil core societal functions of consumption and end use. The agenda for innovation shifts from the traditional macroeconomic or microorganisational level, to a new focus on a range of situated sociotechnical transitions at the mesoregime level. The real world of contemporary innovation policy is assessed in terms of the new policy measures for the transformative innovation implied by this different perspective. A contradictory picture is found of new challenge led, demand oriented, systemic initiatives muddled with a legacy of technology driven, supply side, singular approaches. Evidence is given of how new computer based visualisation analysis of the global energy system reveals that its overall complexity may be addressed through a small number of fundamental end-use or consumption categories. It is argued that these offer the opportunity for a fundamental reframing of innovation policy for the experiments and arenas needed for sociotechnical transitions which are not predetermined by technology-driven choices.

[1]  Boelie Elzen,et al.  Socio-Technical Networks: How a Technology Studies Approach May Help to Solve Problems Related to Technical Change , 1996 .

[2]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Environmental Innovation and Sustainability Transitions in Regional Studies , 2012 .

[3]  Malcolm Eames,et al.  The feasibility of systems thinking in sustainable consumption and production policy: a report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs , 2008 .

[4]  Mario Schmidt,et al.  The Sankey Diagram in Energy and Material Flow Management , 2008 .

[5]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[6]  Howy Jacobs Race to the top , 2010, EMBO reports.

[7]  Bruno Latour,et al.  The Powers of Association , 1984 .

[8]  F. Geels From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[9]  Richard Hull,et al.  The construction of the techno-economic: networks vs. paradigms , 1999 .

[10]  C. Freeman Economics of Industrial Innovation , 1975 .

[11]  F. Geels Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[12]  F. Geels The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms , 2011 .

[13]  E. Hippel Successful Industrial Products from Customer Ideas , 1978 .

[14]  N. Das Human Development Report 2007/2008 Fighting Climate Change: Human Solidarity in a Divided World, UNDP, New York , 2009 .

[15]  Christopher Freeman,et al.  The greening of technology: Introduction , 1994 .

[16]  M. Callon The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle , 1986 .

[17]  R. Kemp Technology and the transition to environmental sustainability , 1994 .

[18]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges , 2010 .

[19]  Arie Rip,et al.  Introduction of New Technology; Making Use of Recent Insights from Sociology and Economics of Technology , 1995 .

[20]  Christopher Freeman,et al.  Technology, progress and the quality of life , 1991 .

[21]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[22]  Julian M. Allwood,et al.  The efficient use of energy: Tracing the global flow of energy from fuel to service , 2010 .

[23]  Luc Soete,et al.  The greening of technological progress: an evolutionary perspective , 1992 .

[24]  Arie Rip,et al.  Re-inventing Innovation , 2010 .

[25]  Johan Schot,et al.  Strategies for shifting technological systems : the case of the automobile system , 1994 .

[26]  Michael Howlett,et al.  Implementing transition management as policy reforms: a case study of the Dutch energy sector , 2009 .

[27]  J. B. Opschoor,et al.  Fighting climate change: Human solidarity in a divided world , 2007 .

[28]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[29]  Fred Steward,et al.  Breaking the boundaries: transformative innovation for the global good , 2008 .

[30]  Nicholas Stern,et al.  Stern Review report on the economics of climate change , 2006 .