Modulatory Effects of Attention on Lateral Inhibition in the Human Auditory Cortex

Reduced neural processing of a tone is observed when it is presented after a sound whose spectral range closely frames the frequency of the tone. This observation might be explained by the mechanism of lateral inhibition (LI) due to inhibitory interneurons in the auditory system. So far, several characteristics of bottom up influences on LI have been identified, while the influence of top-down processes such as directed attention on LI has not been investigated. Hence, the study at hand aims at investigating the modulatory effects of focused attention on LI in the human auditory cortex. In the magnetoencephalograph, we present two types of masking sounds (white noise vs. withe noise passing through a notch filter centered at a specific frequency), followed by a test tone with a frequency corresponding to the center-frequency of the notch filter. Simultaneously, subjects were presented with visual input on a screen. To modulate the focus of attention, subjects were instructed to concentrate either on the auditory input or the visual stimuli. More specific, on one half of the trials, subjects were instructed to detect small deviations in loudness in the masking sounds while on the other half of the trials subjects were asked to detect target stimuli on the screen. The results revealed a reduction in neural activation due to LI, which was larger during auditory compared to visual focused attention. Attentional modulations of LI were observed in two post-N1m time intervals. These findings underline the robustness of reduced neural activation due to LI in the auditory cortex and point towards the important role of attention on the modulation of this mechanism in more evaluative processing stages.

[1]  P. Medvick,et al.  A neuromagnetic study of selective auditory attention. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  J. Eggermont,et al.  The neuroscience of tinnitus , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[3]  Barry Sj,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for the critical band in humans: middle-latency responses. , 1990 .

[4]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[5]  C. Pantev,et al.  Attention Improves Population-Level Frequency Tuning in Human Auditory Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Markus Junghöfer,et al.  ElectroMagnetoEncephalography Software: Overview and Integration with Other EEG/MEG Toolboxes , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[7]  Christo Pantev,et al.  Emotion-Associated Tones Attract Enhanced Attention at Early Auditory Processing: Magnetoencephalographic Correlates , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  C. Pantev,et al.  Tinnitus: the dark side of the auditory cortex plasticity , 2012, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[9]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[10]  R Kakigi,et al.  Lateral inhibition and habituation of the human auditory cortex , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[11]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Electrical Signs of Selective Attention in the Human Brain , 1973, Science.

[12]  M. Sams,et al.  Two-Stage Processing of Sounds Explains Behavioral Performance Variations due to Changes in Stimulus Contrast and Selective Attention: An MEG Study , 2012, PloS one.

[13]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Selective Attention Increases Both Gain and Feature Selectivity of the Human Auditory Cortex , 2007, PloS one.

[14]  R. Hari,et al.  Auditory attention affects two different areas in the human supratemporal cortex. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  C. Schreiner,et al.  Organization of inhibitory frequency receptive fields in cat primary auditory cortex. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  R. Kakigi,et al.  N1m recovery from decline after exposure to noise with strong spectral contrasts , 2004, Hearing Research.

[17]  C. Pantev,et al.  Playing and Listening to Tailor-Made Notched Music: Cortical Plasticity Induced by Unimodal and Multimodal Training in Tinnitus Patients , 2014, Neural plasticity.

[18]  J. Ahveninen,et al.  Auditory-Cortex Short-Term Plasticity Induced by Selective Attention , 2014, Neural plasticity.

[19]  C. Pantev,et al.  Enhancing Inhibition-Induced Plasticity in Tinnitus – Spectral Energy Contrasts in Tailor-Made Notched Music Matter , 2015, PloS one.

[20]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Lateral suppression and inhibition in the cochlear nucleus of the cat. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  The Prefrontal Cortex Modulates Category Selectivity in Human Extrastriate Cortex , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  C. Pantev,et al.  Music-induced cortical plasticity and lateral inhibition in the human auditory cortex as foundations for tonal tinnitus treatment , 2012, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[23]  R. Kakigi,et al.  The dependence of the auditory evoked N1m decrement on the bandwidth of preceding notch‐filtered noise , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[24]  C. Pantev,et al.  Bottom-up driven involuntary attention modulates auditory signal in noise processing , 2010, BMC Neuroscience.

[25]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Attention-driven auditory cortex short-term plasticity helps segregate relevant sounds from noise , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  F. Bloom,et al.  Modulation of early sensory processing in human auditory cortex during auditory selective attention. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  C. Pantev,et al.  Interhemispheric support during demanding auditory signal-in-noise processing. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  C. Pantev,et al.  Modulatory Effects of Spectral Energy Contrasts on Lateral Inhibition in the Human Auditory Cortex: An MEG Study , 2013, PloS one.

[29]  Nobuo Suga,et al.  Sharpening of frequency tuning by inhibition in the central auditory system: tribute to Yasuji Katsuki , 1995, Neuroscience Research.

[30]  Michael Wehr,et al.  Parvalbumin-Expressing Inhibitory Interneurons in Auditory Cortex Are Well-Tuned for Frequency , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[32]  Y. Tong,et al.  P2 enhancement from auditory discrimination training is associated with improved reaction times , 2009, Brain Research.

[33]  Christo Pantev,et al.  Listening to tailor-made notched music reduces tinnitus loudness and tinnitus-related auditory cortex activity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  K. Crowley,et al.  A review of the evidence for P2 being an independent component process: age, sleep and modality , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[35]  Riitta Hari,et al.  Neuromagnetic Responses to Frequency-Tagged Sounds: A New Method to Follow Inputs from Each Ear to the Human Auditory Cortex during Binaural Hearing , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  S. Barry,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for the critical band in humans: middle-latency responses. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[38]  R. Kakigi,et al.  Asymmetric lateral inhibitory neural activity in the auditory system: a magnetoencephalographic study , 2007, BMC Neuroscience.

[39]  Christo Pantev,et al.  Sound Processing Hierarchy within Human Auditory Cortex , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.