Cardiopulmonary bypass with physiological flow and pressure curves: pulse is unnecessary!

OBJECTIVE Advocates of pulsatile flow postulate that the flow pattern during extracorporeal circulation (ECC) should be similar to the physiological one. However, the waveforms generated by clinically used pulsatile pumps are by far different from the physiological ones. Therefore, we constructed a new computer-controlled pulsator which can provide nearly physiological perfusion patterns during ECC. We compared its effect (group 1) with pulsatile (group 2) and non-pulsatile (group 3) perfusion generated by a conventional roller pump. METHODS Thirty pigs (10 per group) underwent 180 min ECC with an aortic cross-clamp time of 120 min. Pulse pressure, peak aortic flow, dp/dt(max), pulsatility index and energy-equivalent pressure were measured online. Renal and intestinal blood flow was calculated by fluorescent microspheres. The inflammatory response was assessed by the level of interleukin 6/1ra, the haemolysis by the free haemoglobin, and the escape rate of plasma protein by the disappearance rate of Evans Blue dye. RESULTS When compared to the preoperative curves, pulsatile waveforms during ECC were similar in group 1 and severely damped in group 2. Inflammatory response increased without significant differences between the groups. There were no differences between groups in renal and bowel blood flow. Free haemoglobin after ECC was higher in the pulsatile groups (group 1=43+/-144 mg dl(-1), group 2=40+/-164 mg dl(-1), group 3=11+/-4mgdl(-1); group 1 vs 2 (ns); group 1 or 2 vs 3 (p<0.001)). The escape rate of Evans Blue increased after ECC in group 1 1.8-fold (p<0.05), in group 2 1.45-fold (p<0.05) and in group 3 1.27-fold (ns). CONCLUSION Even when using pulsatile flow patterns which mimic closely the physiological waveforms, there is no advantage concerning organ perfusion or inflammatory response. Moreover, the extent of haemolysis and capillary leak is higher compared to non-pulsatile perfusion. Efforts to optimise pulsatility are not justified.

[1]  R. Lange,et al.  Capillary leak syndrome after cardiopulmonary bypass in elective, uncomplicated coronary artery bypass grafting operations: does it exist? , 2002, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  J. Weiler,et al.  Cytokine and complement levels in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. , 1993, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[3]  G. von Bernuth,et al.  Inflammatory reaction and capillary leak syndrome related to cardiopulmonary bypass in neonates undergoing cardiac operations. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[4]  K. Taylor,et al.  Comparative clinical study of pulsatile and non-pulsatile perfusion in 350 consecutive patients. , 1982, Thorax.

[5]  G. Rocker,et al.  The Systemic Inflammatory Response to Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Pathophysiological, Therapeutic, and Pharmacological Considerations , 1997, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[6]  C. Fraser,et al.  Impact of membrane oxygenators on pulsatile versus nonpulsatile perfusion in a neonatal model , 2000, Perfusion.

[7]  R. Wakusawa,et al.  Interleukin-10 and Interleukin-1 receptor antagonists increase during cardiac surgery , 1997, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[8]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Effect of cardiopulmonary bypass perfusion protocols on gut tissue oxygenation and blood flow. , 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[9]  S. Hagl,et al.  Influence of steroids on microvascular perfusion injury of the bowel induced by extracorporeal circulation. , 2001, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[10]  M. Elliott,et al.  Ultrafiltration and modified ultrafiltration in pediatric open heart operations. , 1993, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[11]  M. Jochum,et al.  ENDOTOXEMIA AND CYTOKINE GENERATION IN CARDIAC SURGERY IN RELATION TO FLOW MODE AND DURATION OF CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS , 2001, Shock.

[12]  W. Rodkey,et al.  Coronary flow distribution and dynamics during continuous and pulsatile extracorporeal circulation in the pig. , 1977, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[13]  G Wright,et al.  Hemodynamic analysis could resolve the pulsatile blood flow controversy. , 1994, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  R. E. Wood,et al.  Metabolic comparison of a new pulsatile pump and a roller pump for cardiopulmonary bypass. , 1969, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[15]  A. Alghamdi,et al.  Pulsatile Versus Nonpulsatile Cardiopulmonary Bypass Flow: An Evidence‐Based Approach , 2006, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[16]  E. Hessel.  Abdominal Organ Injury After Cardiac Surgery , 2004, Seminars in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[17]  H. Brechtelsbauer,et al.  [Determination of plasma volume with indocyanine green]. , 1987, Der Anaesthesist.

[18]  R. Lange,et al.  Extravasation of albumin after cardiopulmonary bypass in newborns. , 2007, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[19]  Akif Undar,et al.  Myths and truths of pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion during acute and chronic cardiac support. , 2004, Artificial organs.

[20]  T. Orszulak,et al.  The effects of pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass on cerebral and renal blood flow in dogs. , 1997, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[21]  R. Lange,et al.  Effect of cardiopulmonary bypass and hemofiltration on plasma cytokines and protein leakage in pigs. , 2000, The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon.

[22]  A. Undar,et al.  Pediatric physiologic pulsatile pump enhances cerebral and renal blood flow during and after cardiopulmonary bypass. , 2002, Artificial organs.

[23]  S. Braun,et al.  High-dose aprotinin modulates the balance between proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory responses during coronary artery bypass graft surgery. , 2000, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[24]  A. Furness,et al.  To pulse or not to pulse. , 1980, The Annals of thoracic surgery.