How Psychiatry Journals Support the Unbiased Translation of Clinical Research. A Cross-Sectional Study of Editorial Policies

Introduction Reporting guidelines (e.g. CONSORT) have been developed as tools to improve quality and reduce bias in reporting research findings. Trial registration has been recommended for countering selective publication. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) encourages the implementation of reporting guidelines and trial registration as uniform requirements (URM). For the last two decades, however, biased reporting and insufficient registration of clinical trials has been identified in several literature reviews and other investigations. No study has so far investigated the extent to which author instructions in psychiatry journals encourage following reporting guidelines and trial registration. Method Psychiatry Journals were identified from the 2011 Journal Citation Report. Information given in the author instructions and during the submission procedure of all journals was assessed on whether major reporting guidelines, trial registration and the ICMJE’s URM in general were mentioned and adherence recommended. Results We included 123 psychiatry journals (English and German language) in our analysis. A minority recommend or require 1) following the URM (21%), 2) adherence to reporting guidelines such as CONSORT, PRISMA, STROBE (23%, 7%, 4%), or 3) registration of clinical trials (34%). The subsample of the top-10 psychiatry journals (ranked by impact factor) provided much better but still improvable rates. For example, 70% of the top-10 psychiatry journals do not ask for the specific trial registration number. Discussion Under the assumption that better reported and better registered clinical research that does not lack substantial information will improve the understanding, credibility, and unbiased translation of clinical research findings, several stakeholders including readers (physicians, patients), authors, reviewers, and editors might benefit from improved author instructions in psychiatry journals. A first step of improvement would consist in requiring adherence to the broadly accepted reporting guidelines and to trial registration.

[1]  A. Cipriani,et al.  Relationship Between Quality of Reports of Antidepressant Randomized Controlled Trials and Treatment Estimates: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression Analysis , 2007, Journal of clinical psychopharmacology.

[2]  H. Brody From an ethics of rationing to an ethics of waste avoidance. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  G. Rücker,et al.  Do Journals Publishing in the Field of Urology Endorse Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of Author Instructions , 2011, Urologia Internationalis.

[4]  I. Olkin,et al.  Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology - A proposal for reporting , 2000 .

[5]  L. McHenry Ethical issues in psychopharmacology , 2006, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[6]  B. Beermann,et al.  Evidence b(i)ased medicine—selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: review of studies in new drug applications , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. , 2001, BMJ.

[8]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  D. Moher,et al.  Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors' , 2008, Trials.

[10]  Iveta Simera,et al.  Describing reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature: XIV. How to decide on the applicability of clinical trial results to your patient. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 1998, JAMA.

[12]  K. Dickersin How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data. , 1997, AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education.

[13]  G. Antes,et al.  Are pediatric Open Access journals promoting good publication practice? An analysis of author instructions , 2011, BMC pediatrics.

[14]  D L Sackett,et al.  An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  S. Pocock,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2007, Preventive medicine.

[16]  J. G. Palmer,et al.  Institutional review boards should require clinical trial registration. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[17]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. , 1993, JAMA.

[18]  R. J. Hayes,et al.  Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. , 1995, JAMA.

[19]  M. Bauer,et al.  „Quality of reporting“ in Studien zur bipolaren Störung , 2012, Der Nervenarzt.

[20]  D. Moher,et al.  The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[21]  C. Adams,et al.  Content and quality of 2000 controlled trials in schizophrenia over 50 years , 1998, BMJ.

[22]  A. Hrõbjartsson,et al.  Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. , 2004, JAMA.

[23]  Ermenegyldo Munhoz Junior Requisitos uniformes para manuscritos submetidos a periódicos biomédicos: escrevendo e editando para publicações biomédicas , 2006 .

[24]  John Hoey,et al.  Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. , 2005, Circulation.

[25]  G. Antes,et al.  Editorial policies of pediatric journals: survey of instructions for authors. , 2010, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[26]  Robert W. Matthews,et al.  Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Writing and editing for biomedical publication , 2010, Journal of pharmacology & pharmacotherapeutics.

[27]  I. Leviton,et al.  Registering clinical trials. , 2003, JAMA.

[28]  V. Demicheli,et al.  Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[29]  D. Moher,et al.  Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation. , 2001, JAMA.

[30]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authors , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[31]  P. Masand,et al.  The impact of the CONSORT statement on reporting of randomized clinical trials in psychiatry. , 2009, Contemporary clinical trials.

[32]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  M. Bauer,et al.  [Quality of reporting in studies on bipolar disorders: implications for the development of guidelines]. , 2012, Der Nervenarzt.

[34]  Lisa Bero,et al.  Reporting Bias in Drug Trials Submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: Review of Publication and Presentation , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[35]  J. PérezMartín,et al.  [International Committee of Medical Journal Editors]. , 2008, Revista alergia Mexico.

[36]  Peter Fonagy,et al.  Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in childhood depression: systematic review of published versus unpublished data , 2004, The Lancet.

[37]  D. Strech Normative arguments and new solutions for the unbiased registration and publication of clinical trials. , 2012, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[38]  M. Bauer,et al.  Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of pharmacologic treatment of bipolar disorders: a systematic review. , 2011, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[39]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[40]  G. Rücker,et al.  Do urology journals enforce trial registration? A cross-sectional study of published trials , 2011, BMJ Open.

[41]  黄亚明(整理),et al.  ICMJE , 2012 .